Many experts claim we're not in a bubble economy because they can't see the "bubble." Why is beyond me.
The bubble is so enormous that any serious bailout attempt would have to encompass the entire shootin' match, or roughly $600 trillion to $1.5 quadrillion ($1,500,000,000,000,000) in order for it to work. That's the total estimated amount of outstanding derivatives, credit default swaps, and exotics outstanding according to various industry sources.
I say estimated because nobody actually knows for sure, as the derivatives markets remain almost entirely unregulated.
And, that's why the well-intentioned but completely misguided onesey-twosey's bailouts and Band-Aids we've seen so far won't cut it despite the fact that they're already into the trillions of dollars.
I say this because, despite what most politicians and central bankers think, we are not staring at a series of independent bubbles blown into the wind, but a single, massive all-encompassing monster bubble that surrounds us all.
But don't abandon the ship yet. We can get through and take our profits at the appropriate time; all it takes is a little moxie and a steady game plan like this one...
How We Got Here Is a Story in Itself
The total value of the United States' economy is approximately $16.9 trillion. The world's GDP is around $73.8 trillion, while the total capitalization of world stock and bond markets is approximately $212 trillion depending on various sources.
You can see the problem represented at left as easily as I can... there literally isn't enough money on the planet to bail us out, and I don't care who's got the keys to the printing presses.
Bubbles this big don't form overnight. What we've been handed is an overlapping bubble that's gotten progressively larger over time as our legislators, bankers and regulators have progressively "improved" the system. Following World War II, we levered up approximately 10 to 1 as the United States, Europe, and Japan recovered. Then, in the 1970s, the United States moved away from the gold standard. Other nations followed, taking global leverage higher; 30 to 1 became the new standard.
Following the Asian currency crisis and the beginning of Japan's Lost Decade, things jumped to 60 to 1 as ChinIndia, the Dot.bomb boom, and housing took off.
In 1999 Congress tore down Glass-Steagall with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and in the process removed many of the limits between commercial banking and securities firm affiliations.
Shortly thereafter, it passed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act in 2000 which specifically exempted credit default swaps and other exotic derivatives from reporting. That created a Wild West-like atmosphere for traders and their firms using leverage that jumped as high as 100 to 1. The bubble simply grew and grew... and grew. And it's not just in one market either... but in every market. I believe this is precisely what our leaders and bankers are missing. To them, the crisis appears like a bunch of independent bubbles each with its own unique set of causal factors and solutions.
Take your pick: the housing bubble, the credit bubble, the EU, China - you name it, only they're not so independent.
The Problem with the "Smartest Guys in the Room"
So why do guys like Ben Bernanke, Paul Krugman, Janet Yellen, our Congress, the ECB, the Bank of Japan, and China's Central Bank like the idea of printing their way out of this mess?
Three reasons:
- They want to get reelected and/or maintain their own power base in a dramatic demonstration of Parkinson's Law;
- They have failed to understand the lessons from Japan's experience (and 2,000 years of recorded monetary history before that);
- They cannot comprehend that this crisis was caused by too much money rather than too little so they won't admit what they are doing isn't working and pursue another course of action.
I've commented extensively since this crisis began about what they should be doing, so I'm not going to delve into those details again but here's a quick summary:
- Force banks to decide... either they are commercial or investment banks. No in-betweens, no hybrids, and no accounting gimmicks. Break up those who will not cooperate by legislative force if we have to. No taxpayer should be liable for their transgressions. Period.
- Reinstate Glass-Steagall or some variation of it. Dodd-Frankenstein won't work. The system is broken so scrap it and begin anew.
- Let failure happen. History is littered with the bones of failed financial institutions. Things may change, but finance is a process of evolution and it always has been. The key is not allowing mutants to have their run of the planet when what the public trust requires is security, integrity, and honesty.
- No netting. Enact global standards that require big banks to report the true value of their exposure. People were upset about JPMorgan's losses and had a hard time understanding how the bank's trading losses ballooned from an initial $2.1 billion figure to $6.2 billion... until they comprehended that Bruno Iksil, (a.k.a. the "London whale") may have had total exposure exceeding $130 billion, according to industry insiders familiar with the trade.
- Let the markets decide how much is too much. Don't use policy instruments to play God. Some sources suggest that big banks still hold hundreds of billions in trading assets that remain exposed to comparatively illiquid asset markets. Assuming the world's big banks remain levered in line with historic capital ratios, a 20% correction in global markets could wipe them out. With taxpayers still now on the hook for some of that downside risk with the Fed, which is functionally insolvent, that's hardly an appealing thought.
You may have your own opinions or even disagree with mine. That's okay and expected. There are no easy solutions this time, nor is there a singular perspective.
But there is a way to profit amid the turmoil...