Soft Retail Data Sidelines Fed As Critics Proclaim Mission Creep!

Plan for What is Difficult While It Is Easy, Do What Is Great While It Is Small.

Sun Tzu

When the August retail sales number came in at a worse than expected -.3% (expectation of -.1%), Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen must have sighed a little bit, knowing any chance of an interest rate hike next week should be off the table. Still, there are plenty of critics of our embattled Fed head, one which happens to be a mop haired presidential contender. Another, though far more detailed and nuanced in his criticism, is highly regarded value investor and publisher Jim Grant, of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer.

If I may, let me briefly summarize the skeptics argument. It is one of mission creep in that the Federal Reserve was not intended to have things like dual mandates, or to become data dependent when thinking about monetary policy. The Fed was set up to ensure the United States would have a stable currency. Period. The mission has now evolved into concern about inflation, employment, non employment, foreign capital markets, foreign currencies, and even, low and behold, domestic capital markets.

In conjunction with our Federal Reserve, foreign central bankers also are increasingly coming under more skepticism about their unprecedented actions, like quantitative easing resulting in negative yielding short term fixed income instruments. Investors, economists, and informed citizenry question the incentives and outcomes society is experiencing as the result of these actions. This week, the ECB decided to refrain from further easing, and many believe the Bank of Japan will also decide to do the same next week.

Long term bond yields have begun to levitate higher, though only moderately so. Yesterday the 10 year Treasury closed at 1.701%. The lingering question for investors is if bond yields rise, where does the capital fleeing the bond market go? Some believe the short end of the bond market, others believe gold, and the most concerned say cash. Interestingly enough, these issues further highlight the real problem for anyone looking at a capital allocation, that being where is there value?

In specific company news this week, Deutsche Bank (DE:DBKGn) rejected the U.S. Justice Department’s demand of a $14 billion dollar fine regarding mortgage backed security packaging. The complaint adds to the pressure on the banking sector from last week’s Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) news.

Hard to believe that Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren wants the senior management of Wells fired, huh? It might be the first time, now or ever, capitalists will ever agree with Mrs. Warren. It also puts pressure on House Republicans, who currently have a bill pending to strip the claws out of the regulations which provide all kinds of restrictions on big banks.

Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) let the world know sales for the I-phone 7 will be gangbusters, confounding plenty of naysayers on Wall Street. Every year, it seems, you can count on Apple selling 50 million phones a quarter.

Here in Nevada, the Southern Nevada Tourism Infrastructure Committee gave the approval for a 1% tax increase on visitor hotel room stays in order to help fund a football stadium for the Oakland Raiders. It now moves to the state legislature for consideration.If the stadium ever gets funded and the Raiders were to move to Las Vegas, it would be a hard ticket to get and a big win for football fans, not so much for Vegas citizens and travelers.

Finally, bad and worse get set to debate in a week. Predictions have 100 million viewers tuning in. Should be interesting to see who pushes whose buttons and how it is perceived by the voters. You might say there won’t be any missions that night but certainly a couple of creeps.

Y H & C Investments, Yale Bock, and the family of Yale Bock own positions in securities mentioned in the blog post. Investing in stocks can lead to the complete loss of your capital. As always, on any company mentioned here, past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. Investing involves risk of losses on invested capital. One should research any investment and make sure it is suitable with your objectives, risk tolerance, risk profile liquidity considerations, tax situation, and anything else pertinent to your financial situation. Also, the CFA credential in no way implies investment returns will be superior for any charter holder.