Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Justice Dept watchdog to probe seizure of Democrats' communications data

Published 06/11/2021, 12:39 PM
Updated 06/11/2021, 09:11 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Former U.S. President Donald Trump pauses while speaking at the North Carolina GOP convention dinner in Greenville, North Carolina, U.S. June 5, 2021.  REUTERS/Jonathan Drake

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Former U.S. President Donald Trump pauses while speaking at the North Carolina GOP convention dinner in Greenville, North Carolina, U.S. June 5, 2021. REUTERS/Jonathan Drake

By Mark Hosenball

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Justice Department's internal watchdog will probe efforts by the department during former President Donald Trump's administration to seize the communications data of Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives, the watchdog confirmed.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz said his office was beginning a review of the department's "use of subpoenas and other legal authorities to obtain communication records of Members of Congress and affiliated persons, and the news media in connection with recent investigations of alleged unauthorized disclosures of information to the media by government officials."

Horowitz said in a statement that his review will "examine the Department's compliance with applicable DOJ policies and procedures, and whether any such uses, or the investigations, were based upon improper considerations." He said his inquiry could expand if unspecified "other issues" arise during the probe.

The inspector general announced his review after Senate Democrats on Friday demanded that two former U.S. attorneys general testify about reported subpoenas of records of members of Congress by Trump's Justice Department. A White House official criticized the Trump administration actions as "appalling."

Trump's Justice Department subpoenaed Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) for data from the accounts of at least two Democrats on the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee in an attempt to find out who was behind leaks of classified information, the New York Times reported on Thursday.

Congressional officials said committee chair Adam Schiff and committee member Eric Swalwell are the only legislators whose data the Trump Justice Department has been confirmed to have subpoenaed.

"President Trump repeatedly and flagrantly demanded that the Department of Justice carry out his political will, and tried to use the Department as a cudgel against his political opponents and members of the media," Schiff said in a statement on Thursday which called for an inspector general inquiry.

Swalwell confirmed in an interview with MSNBC that his Apple data was seized. Swalwell said he feared that if Trump was re-elected president, he "may just skip the Department of Justice and its processes and just order his lieutenants to lock up his political opponents."

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Senator Dick Durbin said Trump-era Attorneys General Bill Barr and Jeff Sessions should be subpoenaed if necessary to compel them to testify to the Senate Judiciary Committee about the secret seizure of data, calling it a "gross abuse of power."

Kate Bedingfield, White House communications director, said the alleged Justice Department activity illustrated the kind of abuse of power in the former administration that prompted Democratic President Joe Biden to run against Republican Trump.

Biden has made a point of marking the independence of the Justice Department, saying it serves the people, not the president.

On Friday, Barr told Politico that while he ran the Justice Department he was "not aware of any congressman’s records being sought in a leak case."

Apple said on Friday that it received a subpoena in February 2018 seeking customer information for 73 phone numbers and 36 email addresses, not all of which were Apple customers.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz testifies before a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, December 11, 2019. REUTERS/Erin Scott/File Photo

Apple said the subpoena, which came with a gag order from a federal judge, "provided no information on the nature of the investigation and it would have been virtually impossible for Apple to understand the intent of the desired information without digging through users’ accounts."

Apple said it limited the information it provided to metadata and account subscriber information, and that it did not provide any content such as emails or pictures in response to the Justice Department subpoena.

Latest comments

It's all deeply corrupt. I don't think their capable of healthy change any longer. Just a next pooh, to hide the stench of the last one. Here we go round in poohples, Gonna pooh high like a bird up in the sky.
American law has become little more than a means for people to get away with stuff. Wonder who wrote all that?
Trump authoritarian regime, no thx
Democrats are a bunch of corrupted politicians good for nothing but enriching themselves, Joe and HUnter included.
Big baby need a bottle?
Total corruption under Democrats is appalling and shameful.
the Attorney General office has got the goods on Sessions, and Trump's secret attempts to get his enemies. reminds me of something authoritarian regimes do to their journalist when they report the truth in countries like dictatorships in China and Russia.
Such a double standard..
but Obama eavesdropping on Merkel was perfectly ok??
Klaus. still trying to cover up Trump's attempts to turn America into an authoritarian state. false equivalencies and trying to change the subject won't work either.
The Dems leaked secret info, is in bed with the media. But it is very likely that Nothing will come out of this.
Don who?
After the endless criminal acts by dems toward conservatives over the last 6 years?? This is seriously rich.. Wow
Nice pic of the president by Rueters
As opposed to the goofy "halo" pics of the vegetable and the hoe they smear everywhere..
felipe Daniel, Joseph amour, Mark Jannetty are the same person working out of a small cubicle in St Petersburg Russia.
As simple as that: just blame every comment/view that doesn't match your train of thoughts on Russian bots.
felipe Daniel, Joseph Amour,Mark jannetty.. still trying to change the subject away from the gross corruption and abuse of power by the Trump and his Administration. lets see..wanting to protect President Trump from charges of inserection, sidition, election fraud, banking fraud, and tax fraud. your supporting a serial liar, crook cheat and con man. the Robert Mueller Report is a Blueprint for the Justice Department to further investigate more crimes committed by Trump and his henchman. it looks like you didn't read the Mueller Report. or know the fact that a judge dressed down Barr for lying about his assessment on the Mueller's report.
Eric Swallwell all you are good for is spying for China and farting in Congress. Adam Schiff most definitely leaked classified information as he was key player in the Robert Mueller fraud investigation.
If anyone knows about the gross abuse of power its the current democratic party and its lead dog Nancy Pelosi
Let me tell you a secret. But please don't tell anyone: all politicians want to be in power: Reps, Dems, black, white, men, women...
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.