Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Biden warns of 'unconstitutional chaos' due to Texas abortion ban

Published 09/02/2021, 12:09 AM
Updated 09/03/2021, 02:26 PM
© Reuters. Storm clouds roll in over the U.S. Supreme Court, following an abortion ruling by the Texas legislature, in Washington, U.S., September 1, 2021. REUTERS/Tom Brenner

By Lawrence Hurley

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A Texas law imposing a near-total ban on abortion that the U.S. Supreme Court allowed to stand will cause "unconstitutional chaos" by infringing on a right that women have exercised for almost a half-century, President Joe Biden warned on Thursday.

The court, with a 6-3 conservative majority, also raised questions about how it will rule on a more sweeping upcoming case that could curb abortion rights nationwide, as it left in place the ban https://www.reuters.com/world/us/texas-abortion-ban-opens-up-wild-west-enforcement-critics-say-2021-09-02 on abortion after the sixth week of pregnancy.

Texas' ban has so far survived legal challenges partly because of an unusual feature that leaves enforcement up to individual citizens, who could collect cash bounties of at least $10,000 for bringing successful lawsuits against women who seek abortion after their sixth week of pregnancy or those who help them.

Civil rights advocates warned that concept could cause havoc https://www.reuters.com/world/us/texas-abortion-ban-opens-up-wild-west-enforcement-critics-say-2021-09-02 if it is adopted by other states or applied to other contentious rights, such as gun ownership.

"It unleashes unconstitutional chaos and empowers self-anointed enforcers to have devastating impacts," Biden, a Democrat, said in a statement directing federal agencies to act to protect the right to abortion enshrined in the high court's landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. "Complete strangers will now be empowered to inject themselves in the most private and personal health decisions faced by women."

By a 5-4 vote, the justices late on Wednesday denied an emergency request by abortion and women's health providers for an injunction on enforcement of the ban while litigation continues.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The ban took effect early on Wednesday and prohibits abortion at a point when many women do not even realize they are pregnant. The law could still be blocked at some other stage.

The law would amount to a near-total ban on the procedure in Texas - the second-most-populous U.S. state - as 85% to 90% of abortions are obtained after six weeks of pregnancy, and would probably force many clinics to close, abortion rights groups said.

'STUNNING'

One of the court's six conservatives, Chief Justice John Roberts, joined its three liberals in dissent.

"The court's order is stunning," liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a dissenting opinion.

"Presented with an application to enjoin a flagrantly unconstitutional law engineered to prohibit women from exercising their constitutional rights and evade judicial scrutiny, a majority of justices have opted to bury their heads in the sand."

In an unsigned explanation, the court's majority said the Texas law's unusual construction - leaving enforcement to individuals bringing lawsuits - limited its ability to act and that its decision was not a reflection of the ultimate constitutionality of the law.

"Federal courts enjoy the power to enjoin individuals tasked with enforcing laws, not the laws themselves," the court said. "This order is not based on any conclusion about the constitutionality of Texas’s law, and in no way limits other procedurally proper challenges to the Texas law, including in Texas state courts."

A majority of Americans believe abortion should be legal in the United States, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling. In a June survey https://www.reuters.com/world/us/plurality-americans-would-strike-down-mississippi-abortion-ban-2021-06-24, some 52% said it should be legal in most or all cases, with just 36% saying it should be illegal in most or all cases.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The Republican president of Florida's state Senate, Wilton Simpson, told local station WFLY-TV on Thursday that he planned to follow Texas' lead and bring up a similar abortion ban in the chamber's next session.

"This law will begin saving the lives of tens of thousands of Texas babies and we look forward to the day that babies’ lives will be spared across America," said Carol Tobias, president of the anti-abortion National Right to Life Committee.

Biden, a Roman Catholic who has shifted to the left on abortion in recent years, said the White House would look at what steps the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Justice can take to respond to the Texas law. The Office of the White House Counsel and Biden's Gender Policy Council will also review the matter.

POLARIZING ISSUE

Abortion remains a deeply polarizing issue, with a majority of Democrats supporting abortion rights and most Republicans opposing them. The number of abortions reported to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has dropped in recent decades, to roughly 620,000 in 2018, the most recent figures, down from 790,000 in 2009.

Congress has the power to legalize abortion nationwide, and House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi blasted the Texas law and vowed to take up a bill to do so when Congress returns later this month.

"Its purpose is to destroy Roe v. Wade, and even refuses to make exceptions for cases of rape and incest," Pelosi said. "This ban necessitates codifying Roe v. Wade."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Democrats hold narrow majorities in Congress, but passage in the House would not guarantee success in the Senate, which requires 60 of its 100 members to agree on most legislation. Democrats hold 50 seats in that chamber, with Vice President Kamala Harris holding a tie-breaking vote.

The court decision illustrates the impact of Republican former President Donald Trump's three conservative appointees to the nation's highest court, who have tilted it further to the right. All were in the majority.

A ban like Texas' has never been permitted in any state since the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade.

Texas is among a dozen mostly Republican-led states to ban the procedure once a fetal heartbeat can be detected, often at six weeks.

Courts had previously blocked such bans, citing Roe v. Wade.

The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in the coming months in a case centering on Mississippi's 15-week abortion ban, in which the state has asked the justices to overturn Roe v. Wade. A ruling is due by the end of June 2022.

Latest comments

Leftists love ***the unborn, yet living children.
The deleted word is K, followed by an I then two LL's.
Nothing but chits coming out of bibles
So, “good trouble”, right?
Now biden is worried about something being unconstitutional. He thought it was ok to take away property owners right. That was also unconstitutional and he did it anyways. Hypocrite!!
Whether you like it or not, at 6 weeks there is a heartbeat. Beyond doubt its a life at that point. The point I dont agree with is outlawing the *******and ********cases. That is ridiculous.
There should be mandatory abortion for low life not meeting income requirements
Taliban governs Texas?
Nope, just people who don’t want babies killed.
Wait, women's health? Now it's women's health? So much Democrat Discrimination.
Dude, you left more arms and equipment to ***than entire Europe has.  And you call this little ********thing a chaos!
God bless Texas!
Um.. we've been witnessing "Unconstitutional Chaos'" of epic porortions over the last 8 months.
use *******feminists
Never forget the crimes that Joe Biden has committed. His administration may be sweeping everything under the rug. Just don't forget people
Hey my body my choice right but I guess that’s only for when a woman wants to get an ***not when pharmaceuticals are to be jabbed into your body infringing on your rights and religious rights and medical rights and freedom of movement rates and the right to work and the right to eat but hey let’s let’s cry over abortions
when the woman doesn't know who the father is, she goes for *** but the Texan knows, so why should she
CHAOS is leaving 85 billion dollars of US military equipment in the hands of the Taliban and abandoning Americans to get tortured to death by ISIS. 81 million people did not vote for this fraud.
Really? I mean really? You wanna see unconstitutional chaos, just look at Afghanistan. If that's not a president violating the constitutional dictates of his office, then nothing is.
How does leaving Afghanistan have anything to do with "unconstitutional chaos"? It was chaotic, yes. But nothing to do with the US Constitution.
Ole Joe is confused. The chaos he's referring to is what he caused in Afghanistan. He couldn't find Texas on a map.
Conservative justices rule based on the Constitution. Liberal justices rule based on their own political agendas. Dont talk to us about a Constitutional crisis.
Your wrong. Read the Federalist papers. You may learn a thing or two about power and why the existence of the Supreme court helps water it down. Which is the real purpose of having our government broken up into so many parts. The reason conflict between each branch and within the House and Senate is desirable. While too much cooperation is the end of democracy.
Read your constitution. The Supreme Court does not rule on the wording of the law or Constitution. It is a third branch of our government. Openly and clearly a political body. What it decides with each ruling is the current political leanings of interpretation of the U.S. constitution. Those political leanings make the justices as powerful as any Senator, and as a whole, as powerful as the office of the president. The Supreme court DECIDES what the law IS, and they decide whether to make such decisions or not. That IS how the founding fathers intended!!! Check Justice Marshals first big case.
What so many don't understand is how can the lib Justices be so gracious in everybody else receiving their so called rights and yet the smallest among us are not allowed to even breathe air. The dissenters need to review their law degrees.
Abort now or regret later
Try using a ******lol. The percentage of actual ******and *****is i believe less than 0.2% of all abortions. So that doesnt fly anymore never should have but libs cant read or think so….
Cant wait for more states to follow Texas
There is no resson to block it. Roe is going to fall.
nope
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.