Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

After months of work, U.S. senators unveil $1 trillion infrastructure bill

Published 08/01/2021, 06:07 AM
Updated 08/01/2021, 11:05 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Vehicles are parked outside the U.S. Capitol building the morning the Senate returned to session in Washington, DC, U.S., July 31, 2021. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo

By David Morgan and Richard Cowan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. senators introduced a sweeping $1-trillion bipartisan plan to invest in roads, bridges, ports, high-speed internet and other infrastructure, with some predicting the chamber could pass this week the largest public works legislation in decades.

The massive infrastructure package, a goal that has eluded Congress for years, is a top legislative priority for Democratic President Joe Biden, who billed it on Sunday as the largest such investment in a century.

Senators said the 2,702-page bill included $550 billion in new spending over five years for items such as roads, rail, electric vehicle charging stations and replacing lead water pipes on top of $450 billion in previously approved funds.

"I believe we can quickly process relevant amendments and pass this bill in days," Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, said of the legislation after it was announced by a bipartisan group of senators.

"This is a really important bill because it takes our big, aging and outdated infrastructure in this country and modernizes it. That’s good for everybody," said Senator Rob Portman, the lead Republican negotiator.

However, some Republicans criticized the bill as too costly.

"I’ve got real concerns with this bill," Republican Senator Mike Lee said in a floor speech. "All is not well with the way we spend money."

It was not yet clear whether senators outside the bipartisan group that negotiated the bill will offer amendments that could possibly upset the delicate coalition that was cobbled together.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

If the bill passes the Senate, it must be considered in the House of Representatives, where some Democrats have blasted it as too small and the Democratic leadership has paired it with a $3.5 trillion "human infrastructure" bill to pour money into education, child care, climate change and other priorities.

Democrats want to offset that social spending with tax hikes on corporations and wealthy Americans earning more than $400,000 a year, measures opposed by Republicans, leaving the fate of both bills up in the air.

Sunday night's developments capped months of negotiating, and infighting, among several groups of senators and the White House.

Initially, Biden said he was seeking about $2 trillion in a bipartisan bill, an amount that Republicans rejected as wasteful and unnecessary.

A group of Republican senators then worked on a plan to spend far less, an effort that eventually died, raising questions if Congress could fashion a deal allowing the Democratic president to fulfill his Jan. 20 inauguration promise of working cooperatively with Republicans.

A bipartisan group of senators, led by Arizona Democrat Kyrsten Sinema, a moderate, and the conservative Portman toiled for months, adding input from House centrists, on a new plan closer to what Biden would accept.

Late in June the group said it had reached a $1.2-trillion deal, but filling in details took more than a month.

With prodding from Schumer and Biden, the negotiators put their staffs to work, nearly around-the-clock, culminating in Sunday's final deal.

Latest comments

Republican: Arghhh go to war !!!!Democrats: Economic, tax, speeendddd $$$$Me: $imCity hohoho
It’s simple, investing in infrastructure enables business to grow, growing business is a good thing for this country. Picking fights and threatening fellow citizens is a bad thing, it is divisive and a complete waste of time, like Turker Carlsin.
Didn't Obama pass a 900 billion "shovel ready" stimulus plan that wasted most of tax payers money. This will be just like it. Money down a rate hole.
$1 trillion? Wasn't this $3.5 trillion a week ago? My goodness democrats must be worried about their plummeting approval...not looking good for midterms and 2024. Biden/Kamala have plummeting approval, Trump getting millions attending his rallies even while being censored/banned by social media and  not aired on MSM, approval for MSM is under 30% almost as low as approval for Congress. Over the past year, the two fields which lost the most support are teachers and medical workers, and the field which gained the most support is police. The leftist narrative has completely fallen apart. CNN has reportedly lost 68% of its viewers this year, while Fox is number one and Tucker Carlson is the number one person in the ratings on all of television news. This is why they attack him so much. I am not republican, but the democrats only have themselves to blame for pushing ma.rxist agenda and being slaves to the globalists.
"I am not a republican, but here is every trumpist republican talking point." Just own it.. quit trying to dupe people into thinking you are an independent
A  trillion here, a trillion there. When will the Americans stop using this monopoly money?
This will be awsome, just like the Obama years of booming economy. Not!
Can i have free internet or 20usd/month before the gov ‘net neutrality’ bill? If they jack up internet 25% more after this, i’ll call them lia rs n th ievrs.
No vote on this one until the reconciobill passes!
$900B+ per year on military, cut that in half or even down to 1/4 and invest in infrastructure that will yield growth for 10 years. makes sense to me, what are you guys whining about?
The liberals can’t even build a train in California that they spent 9 billion dollars on. It’s not even finished after a decade. And they called it high speed train lol It’s the slowest train on the earth. Basically the 1 trillion the liberals want will get nothing ofImportance done
Great...so higher inflation? 'Infrastructure' spending is just a another term for QE
Haha Are you kidding Look at the California high speed rail project. It raised transportation cost and did not lower travel time. It was a 10 billion dollar waste of taxpayers money. Brought to you by the governor Jerry Brown. And continued waste under Newsom. Liberals can’t even build a train lol Now one TRILLION for roads ?
 I didn't say it will be cheaper. I said at least the money will work.
Was replying to Thomes
How can they pass this legislation when the debt ceiling expired yesterday?Federal government needs a new line of credit.
Debt ceiling is set by someone. So what? It can be reset.
passing infrasture allows dems to ram through the budget with their over spending. 2021 budget was 2.3 trillion. dems appear to have given up on 2022 elections. they think this is their last hurah.
the liberals always spend more than something should cost. in this case, they do it solely for union votes. this always sticks the taxpayers, including union workers, with higher taxes to pay off the increase in debt. the charging stations will be ghost towns. there's hardly a business out there with charging stations that ever has anybody's car plugged in. I've seen one car plugged in - one time! plus, about 4 out 5 electric car owners trade in their cars for hybrids. fully electric cars are a pain in the rump of their owners.
And conservatives always grumble and cry for the good old days.
Bidenflation Bill
z????$ ?? o ?'ZZZ up ×fox b$ x
Its full of pork. Do not pass this bill that supports tye communist takeover.
I ask my GOP Senators to read the bill very carefully and make sure there is no Left Wing junk in there before signing off.  Stick to your core Conservative Beliefs.
Left wing junk??? Everything in there is left wing junk and everybody that voted for the bill got a fat check- 100%
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.