Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

In victory for Trump, Republicans block probe of U.S. Capitol riot

Published 05/28/2021, 09:26 AM
Updated 05/28/2021, 05:36 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A mob of supporters of then-U.S. President Donald Trump climb through a window they broke as they storm the U.S. Capitol Building in Washington, U.S., January 6, 2021. REUTERS/Leah Millis

By Susan Cornwell

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Republicans in the U.S. Senate on Friday derailed a bipartisan inquiry into the deadly assault on the Capitol by former President Donald Trump's supporters, despite a torrent of criticism the lawmakers were playing down the violence.

Democrats and some moderate Republicans had called for a commission to probe the events up to and including Jan. 6, when hundreds of supporters of Trump, a Republican, stormed the Capitol, fighting with police, urging violence against lawmakers and delaying the formal certification of President Joe Biden's election victory. The violence left five people dead including a Capitol Police officer.

The measure mustered a 54-35 vote which fell short of the 60 votes needed to advance the legislation in the 100-member Senate. The 35 no votes were all Republicans. Six Republicans voted in favor of the commission.

"We all know what's going on here. Senate Republicans chose to defend the Big Lie because they feared that anything that might upset Donald Trump could hurt them politically," Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said after the vote.

The proposed commission would have had the power to force witnesses, possibly including Trump, to testify under oath about what happened that day. Trump had urged Republican lawmakers to vote against it and warned of "consequences" for those who supported it.

It was the first time this year that Republicans used the 60-vote hurdle, known as a filibuster, to defeat legislation.

The vote underscores the steep challenges for Democrats in the evenly divided chamber, as they will have to win the support of at least one in five Republicans to pass policing reforms, voting-rights legislation and other priorities.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The White House said Biden remained committed to a full, independent investigation of the attack.

'LIMITS OF BIPARTISANSHIP'

Senate Democrats have been under pressure from activists on the left to scrap the chamber's longstanding supermajority rule, but have so far declined to do so. In a letter to Democrats after the vote, Schumer said Congress had "seen the limits of bipartisanship."

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell has argued that a commission would have duplicated work done by other congressional committees, as well as a sweeping federal criminal investigation that has so far resulted in the arrests of more than 440 people.

But Republicans are also concerned that a commission, modeled on one that probed the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, would focus attention on the violence and on Trump's persistent false claims about the 2020 election well into next year's midterm congressional election campaigns.

Republicans did not defend these positions on the Senate floor before or after the vote.

The proposal previously passed the House of Representatives with the support of all Democrats and 1 in 6 Republicans after bipartisan negotiations.

"It is unfortunate that we fell a few votes short of what was needed to begin debate on this vital legislation," said Senator Susan Collins, one of the Republicans who voted to create a commission.

Collins took the most active stance in her party in pushing against McConnell in support of the bill, securing Schumer's support for an amendment requiring the commission staff be appointed by Democrats and Republicans.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

She had a tense exchange with Schumer during Friday's vote and Republican colleague Mitt Romney said she had been disappointed the Democratic leader hadn't voiced support for her amendments during his floor speech. Schumer said he voiced support for many senators including at least one Republican, Rob Portman.

In addition to Collins, Romney and Portman, Senators Lisa Murkowski, Bill Cassidy and Ben Sasse also voted for the commission. Two Democrats and nine Republicans skipped the vote.

After the Senate vote, House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Democrats would "proceed to find the truth" about what happened on Jan. 6, but said nothing about whether she would set up a special committee to investigate, as some Democrats have suggested.

Latest comments

Why investigate what is obvious ??
We no longer have a representative government. Hypocritch McConnell asked the republican senators for a "personal favor" to vote against the bipartisan commission. So now, Hypocritch McConnell personal interests, is now put ahead of the 350 million Americans our "representatives are supposed to "represent". The republican party corruption has reached the level I can no longer support it. I'm done with it. Some claim the insurrection was pro-Trump, some say it was Antifa ... would have been nice to investigate this so all Americans would learn the truth.
You sound like a Democrat.
Donald Trump before he was President was screwing banks, business partners, the government, workers and customers, now, with help from law enforcement, we're going to find out how bad he has screwed America when he was President.
Louis anulare. I guess if you tell your lie along and hard enough even you will believe it.
This article loses all credibility when the author lies about a well publicized fact that no police officer died from the "riot". This was a lie since it was fabricated on 6 Jan and has since been proven as such over a month ago. It is discusting to me that this author would choose to lie or is this incompetent and still has job. BTW-The only deaths were related to trump supporters, one of whom was an Air Force veteran who was unarmed and shot by police or other security. In this case, the police/security officer was determined to be acting appropriately despite the fact that she posed no life threatening actions at the time. As a reporter u have a responsibility to this country to be factual and accurate or perhaps it is your goal to have freedom of speech taken away to ruin our country?
Trump "victory", US democracy failure. In future, any presidential candidates can send rioters to capitol if they don't accept election results.
This is a "victory" for America. The witch hunts and conspiracy theories from the the dem fascists have to stop. Time to learn how to respect others again.
Nothing else for dem to do.
who are the 2 DEMOCRATS who voted no? 54 in favor, but democrats are 50, and 6 republicas voted no. so 2 democrats voted no, why this is not mentioned in the article? is simple math
You needed to keep reading the article...
Read the article.
james Marshall.. Republicans spent $1.9 trillion on tax cuts that primarily benefited the wealthy and corporations and in return will get a very meager 0.7 percent in additional economic growth over the next decade. that tax cut was a pathetic attempt to reward the rich and the mega-corporations at the expense of the future of ordinary Americans. that money should have been invested in the America's Future, not tax cuts for the corporations and the mega rich.
lmfao you mean the covid crash because they mismanaged the heck outta it now we gotta spam the money printers to get us outta your hole
What hole are you talking about?
 Trump shtick: Take all credit.  Cake was baked after  2009 meltdown - inherited from  a  GOP admin.  DJT admin layered on frosting and was doing good, sort of, till national/world crisis saw DJT admin translated  leadership  into battling states to  point fingers, abdicate coordination/help,  manage "image/ratings."
10x time as many die from goof valls. Another ploy to keep the guppies from paying attention to their wealth and future being stolen...
Let me get this straight.  5 people died on that day and they don't want to investigate the Capitol Riots....TRAITORS!!!!!!!!
Were they killed?
Eudon Hickey ..the failure was with Trump administration officials responsible for the protection of the Capitol.
Capital police knew they were coming and invited them in.. it's on tape!
its called using facts instead of just aligning to convenient biases, i recommend trying it some time
 You  give stupid a good name.
When are they investigating Pelosi’s 8Jan “neuclear call”?? When are they charging Chuck and Nancy for 6Jan procedure failures?
Well, Eudon, since your party voted for no probe into events of that day, the answer seems to be never. (Thank the sycophantic Republicans who prefer myths to facts, for that).
Duane Goodson..the Republican Trump supporters mobed the capital injuring dozens of police officers, threatened to *******government leaders the Vice President and bring down our democracy you are supporting inserection and sidition. your false equivalency is typical of Trump supporters that want an authoritarian despot wannabe like Trump, to take over America.
bipartisan?? because a FEW Rinos for it? Fake news
Robby boy..I thought you loved fake news, you believe everything Trump says. So what's the problem.
BLM burns cities, loots, murders = media nothing to see here "mostly peaceful". Concerned citizens about voter fraud = inserection.
Stop conflating peaceful protests with violent riots. No mainstream media said "nothing to see here" about the summer riots. It dominated the news for a long time. They did, however, correctly report that most of the daytime protests were peaceful. Trumpanzees, however, keep talking about the night-time riots as if they were the same people who were protesting during the day. For the most part, they were not. Just like there were some peaceful protesters at the Capitol that day before the crazies showed up and started scaling the walls and breaking in, in hopes of subverting the democratic process by stopping the Constitutional act of certifying the electoral college results.
BLM burns cities, loots, murders = media nothing to see here. Concerned citizens about voter fraud = inserection.
Danny Levine, another Republican supporter of sedition, Trump's inserection and attempted anti Democratic grab.
I'm surprised Mitch fell for this
This is good news, now the democrats can proceed with a select committee instead of one handcuffed by the antidemocracy party, so we can get to the real truths.
We want the names of those 15 republicans that voted in favor. A dived GOP isn't gonna work. They need to clean the house... or the senate. Actually... Both.
*divided
WitchHunt averted !!
stop saying it's deadly. only people died of violence is a veteran being shot by the police. the other deaths were from health reasons
 Like the founding fathers betrayed their oath to the crown...?
Jethro..America is not a colony seeking independence from tyranny.we are A FREE DEMOCRATIC NATION, with a portion of our population that perfers strongman authoritarianism, instead of a constitutional democracy based on the rule of law. these people are willing to support and give their allegiance to a would be strongman, that would lie and cheat to get and maintain power, destroying American Democracy and it's Constitution.
another far right false equivalency. come on you can do better than that.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.