Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

U.S. Senate Republicans, Romney pave way for vote on Trump Supreme Court pick

Published 09/22/2020, 07:11 AM
Updated 09/22/2020, 10:30 PM
© Reuters. A makeshift memorial for recently passed Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States Ruth Bader Ginsburg is seen outside her childhood home in Brooklyn, New York

By Andy Sullivan and Richard Cowan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senate Republicans including Mitt Romney on Tuesday lined up behind President Donald Trump's push to widen the U.S. Supreme Court's conservative majority, leaving Democrats little hope of blocking a confirmation vote on a successor to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg that could come before the Nov. 3 election.

Trump said he had "a pretty good idea" of his choice for the seat in an interview on WGN America's NewsNation program. He told reporters earlier: "We're getting very close to having a final decision made."

The president has said he plans to announce his nominee by Saturday and has urged the Senate, where his fellow Republicans hold a 53-47 majority, to vote before the election.

Trump has mentioned two women whom he has appointed as federal appeals court judges as possible nominees: Amy Coney Barrett of the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and Barbara Lagoa of the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Trump met with Barrett at the White House on Monday and has said he might meet with Lagoa in Florida later this week.

Romney, a rare Trump critic among Republican senators, said he favored having a vote on Trump's pick, giving his party enough support to approve the president's third appointment to the high court.

Ginsburg's replacement could steer the court in a more conservative direction on abortion, healthcare, gun rights, voting access, presidential powers and other spheres of American life.

Romney, the unsuccessful 2012 Republican presidential nominee, said it would be appropriate for a nation that he described as center-right politically to have a Supreme Court "that reflects center-right points of view."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Romney and other Republicans have dismissed Democratic arguments that the Senate should wait until after voters decide whether to re-elect Trump or chose Democratic challenger Joe Biden in November. A Reuters/Ipsos poll published on Sunday found that a majority of Americans, including many Republicans, also wanted the election winner to make the nomination.

"I intend to follow the Constitution and precedent in considering the president's nominee," Romney said.

At a campaign rally in Pittsburgh later on Tuesday, Trump thanked Romney after ridiculing him for voting to convict the president during Trump's impeachment trial in February.

"But he was very good today, I have to tell you. Now I'm happy. Thank you, Mitt," Trump said.

Ginsburg, a pioneering advocate of gender equality who served on the court for 27 years, died on Friday at age 87.

Democrats accuse Republican senators of hypocrisy, pointing out that they refused even to consider Democratic President Barack Obama's nominee to fill a vacant Supreme Court seat in 2016 because it was an election year.

Romney said that was not a concern for him, as Washington was split between a Democratic White House and a Republican-led Senate that year, while this year Republicans control both.

Four Republicans would have to join the Democrats in opposing a confirmation vote to block the nomination. Only two have taken that position.

Alaska's Lisa Murkowski and Maine's Susan Collins said the Senate should not consider a nominee this year. Two Republican senators who had been the focus of some speculation as to their position, Cory Gardner of Colorado and Chuck Grassley of Iowa, also have made clear they support moving ahead with the confirmation process.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

There is enough support among Senate Republicans to hold a vote on the nominee before Nov. 3, according to two Republican aides who spoke on condition of anonymity.

'THE INSTITUTION OF THE SENATE'

The chamber's top Democrat, Chuck Schumer, said the Supreme Court vote "may now very well destroy the institution of the Senate." Schumer took action to prevent Senate committees from conducting business on Tuesday afternoon in a symbolic protest.

Public mourning events for Ginsburg will be held in front of the Supreme Court on Wednesday and Thursday and in the Capitol on Friday.

Republican Senator Rick Scott of Florida said he had spoken to Trump about Lagoa. Scott said choosing the Cuban-American judge would help Trump in the election in states with large numbers of Latinos including pivotal Florida. Trump trails Biden in national opinion polls ahead of the election.

Barrett is a favorite of Christian conservatives, a key constituency for Trump.

Democrats have few, if any, options for preventing a vote.

Top congressional Democrats have downplayed possibilities such as holding a second impeachment vote, withholding government funding that is due to expire on Sept. 30, or boycotting committee hearings.

"I've been around here a few years. You can slow things down but you can't stop them," Dick Durbin, the Senate's No. 2 Democrat, told reporters.

The Senate could also vote in a lame-duck session after the election before a new Congress is sworn in on Jan. 3.

Latest comments

This can cost Trump the election. And we will have 13 justices in the supreme court if that happens.That's what FDR did, from 6 to 9.
Trump 2020 and beyond. the corrupt will crumble
And would the democrats really eait if they had the office and senate under their control. Wake up everyone, the Democrats would be pushinf everthing and everyone to put their judge in the seat. That is politics. I wouldnt expect less.
Bal...what a horrible thought...but a great reason to vote Republican!!!
Senate, house r not gonna vote when election is near. End of story.
House has no vote on this , learn the process before you give a uneducated opinion. The Republicans will vote, they do not need the Dems to vote. all is need is a simple majority.
I recommend Trump take Democrats advice and increase the Supreme Court seats to 11 and choose 3 women judges on Saturday
That would require the approval of the House and Senate. It would never happen.
Liberals are just upset they loss back in 2016 and will again in 2020. SCOTUS will be confirmed.
Was leaning republican until this nonsense. Now im surely voting for Biden. Cant take the rights lies anymore!
Hmmm...so you believe the Left has been telling you the truth? Or that they have been telling you fewer lies? It is difficult for me to believe anyone in the digital age is that poorly informed. Are you a bot?
Move to Saudi Arabia, it's even more conservative!
Romney is a Rino and everyone knows it. Never was a republican. Conservatives vote God's way so argue with putting one in?
Our country is a joke! The senate leader is about to loss his majority
Ginsberg was nominated in 42 days election year
Wikipedia was nominated in April 1993 by Bill Clinton. That wasn’t a Presidential Election year.
The Supreme Joke.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.