Breaking News
0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

U.S. refusal to defend lawmaker in Capitol riot a signal to Trump -experts

WorldJul 29, 2021 06:51PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump gather in front of the U.S. Capitol Building in Washington, U.S., January 6, 2021. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo

By Sarah N. Lynch

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department's refusal to defend a Republican congressman accused in a civil lawsuit of helping to incite the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol could hamper former President Donald Trump's legal defense in the same case, experts said.

The department late Tuesday told a federal judge it had declined https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-justice-dept-wont-defend-republican-lawmaker-capitol-riot-lawsuit-2021-07-28 a request by Representative Morris "Mo" Brooks to grant him immunity by covering him under the Westfall Act, which shields federal employees from being sued for their words or actions in the course of their employment.

Experts said the move appeared to send a message to Trump, a co-defendant in the case, ruling out immunity when it warned that inciting an attack on Congress "is not within the scope of employment of a Representative - or any federal employee."

Donald Ayer, a senior Justice Department official in the Republican administrations of Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, said: "The government's filing sends a clear message... No leader in our government is acting within the scope of his employment when he acts to subvert the free and fair election by getting people to go up and riot and interfere."

"The leaders who perpetrated these travesties are personally responsible for their actions." he added. A spokesman for Brooks could not be immediately reached for comment.

Brooks and Trump are co-defendants in a lawsuit by Democratic Representative Eric Swalwell that accuses them of inciting people during a Jan. 6 rally to attack the Capitol and stop Congress from certifying President Joe Biden's election victory.

Trump is a defendant in two other similar lawsuits, one filed by Democratic Representative Bennie Thompson and another on behalf of two U.S. Capitol police officers.

Trump has so far not publicly requested Justice Department protection in the case, nor has his attorney Jesse Binnall said whether he intends to ask the department to take a position.

In a statement, Binnall said: "The Supreme Court has been clear that presidents cannot be sued for actions that are related to their duties of office. Addressing Americans about congressional action is a quintessential presidential duty."

The Justice Department declined to comment.

The department riled some Democrats https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-defending-presidency-not-trying-save-trump-recent-legal-moves-2021-06-08 with a pair of recent decisions that seemed to shield Trump or members of his administration, though legal experts said the moves were intended to protect the office of the presidency, not its former occupant.

Trump's primary legal defense in the Swalwell suit has not rested on the Westfall Act but on a legal doctrine that argues the separation of powers in the U.S. Constitution broadly grants the president immunity during his time in office.

"Rousing and controversial speeches are a key function of the presidency. That is especially true when, as is the case here, the President is advocating for or against congressional action," his lawyer wrote in a May 24 filing.

In a footnote, the lawyer added: "Even if former President Trump is not covered by absolute immunity, as a governmental actor, the claims against him are also foreclosed by immunity under the Westfall Act."

Attorney Anne Tindall of the advocacy group Protect Democracy said the department's filing contains a lot of signs that are "bad news for Trump."

"Trump's role is even more limited than Brooks' is," said Tindall, who is representing two Capitol Police officers in a separate lawsuit alleging Trump incited the riot.

"Brooks has a role in the certification. He has a vote in Congress. DOJ concluded that the conduct at issue in the litigation is not sufficiently related to his vote," Tindall said. "Here Trump has no role at all."

U.S. refusal to defend lawmaker in Capitol riot a signal to Trump -experts
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (6)
Mad Money
Mad Money Jul 29, 2021 9:58PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Let them defend themselves with their own money 🤣
William Smith
William Smith Jul 29, 2021 7:48PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
A good old 3rd world type political witch hunt with made up crimes and "facts", right here in the USA. 3rd World serfdom can't be far behind.
Tre Hsi
Tre Hsi Jul 29, 2021 7:48PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
you mean like when a president asking another country to investigate his opponent's son for made up crimes and "facts", things like that, right?
John Avenetti
John Avenetti Jul 29, 2021 7:24PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
who believes the news or the DOJ has anything to do with justice. the whole thing is a massive sham.
Tre Hsi
Tre Hsi Jul 29, 2021 7:24PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
yes, it's not like The Donald was in charge of DOJ for the last 4 years or anything......
Tre Hsi
Tre Hsi Jul 29, 2021 11:11AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
"a request by Representative Morris "Mo" Brooks to grant him immunity by covering him under the Westfall Act, which shields federal employees from being sued for their words or actions in the course of their employment."  -- only a MAGA republican congressman would think attending Trump rally is part of their job requirements
John Avenetti
John Avenetti Jul 29, 2021 11:11AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
what do you think of BLM and the stance of the DNC on the rioting that tore down American cities for weeks last year??? oh please, do tell
Tre Hsi
Tre Hsi Jul 29, 2021 11:11AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
John Avenetti  did the DNC or any democrat congressman participated in the riots and did they ask the judge to give them immunity?  if not then I don't see why BLM got to do with a republican congressman asking the judge for immunity......
Ferdinando Riboni
Ferdinando Riboni Jul 29, 2021 9:33AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
if he was a Democrat or Blm it would be ok
Benjamin McIntire
Benjamin McIntire Jul 29, 2021 8:15AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Republicans went full on clow n mode over trump.
Kevin Avila
Kevin Avila Jul 29, 2021 8:15AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I was a first time voter… Neither a Democrat or Republican. I voted for Trump because that was what was best for this country… I’m not too upset. I hope to make some of you my burgers.
John Avenetti
John Avenetti Jul 29, 2021 8:15AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Kevin Avila thats me early and I'm 48 and was born here.
John Avenetti
John Avenetti Jul 29, 2021 8:15AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Kevin Avila me "ALSO"
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email