Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

US News will still rank law schools as Georgetown and Columbia join boycott

Published 11/18/2022, 01:39 PM
Updated 11/18/2022, 04:45 PM
© Reuters.

By Karen Sloan

(Reuters) -At least five leading law schools broke up this week with the U.S. News & World Report rankings, with Columbia Law and Georgetown Law on Friday joining the law schools at Yale, Harvard and Berkeley in ending their participation.

The rankings aren’t breaking up with them in return, however. U.S. News will continue to rank schools that choose not to provide it with their internal data, its chief data strategist Robert Morse said in a statement.

“U.S. News has a responsibility to prospective students to provide comparative information that allows them to assess these institutions,” Morse wrote on the magazine's website late Thursday.

Yale Law School, which has been No. 1 in the influential rankings, said Wednesday it will no longer submit internal data to U.S. News.

No. 4-ranked Harvard Law School followed suit hours later. The University of California, Berkeley School of Law, which is ranked No. 9, withdrew on Thursday. Columbia, which is tied with Harvard at No. 4, and No. 14-ranked Georgetown University Law Center did the same on Friday.

The deans of the boycotting law schools have said the rankings punish schools whose graduates pursue public interest jobs or advanced degrees, while rewarding those that spend more on students and drive up tuition.

Legal educators have also argued that the rankings overemphasize Law School Admission Test scores and undergraduate grade-point averages, prompting schools to offer merit scholarships over need-based assistance.

Berkeley law dean Erwin Chemerinsky said in an interview that he did not know whether declining to provide information will impact his school's ranking.

“I decided we just have to do what’s right, and hopefully it won’t hurt us," he said.

Chemerinsky said the rankings' credibility would suffer if top law schools fall significantly after declining to participate in the evaluations.

Morse's statement did not say how U.S. News will account for data that schools stop providing. The magazine did not immediately respond to requests for more information.

The law school rankings are based on internal data supplied by schools such as their expenditures-per-student and average graduate debt, and reputational surveys filled out by legal academics and practicing lawyers. They are also based on publicly available data produced by the American Bar Association on incoming student LSAT scores and undergraduate grades, bar pass rates, and graduate employment.

 

Latest comments

Well, we certainly do not want to reward merit.
The article exposes one of the biggest problems in our society as a whole, which is the focus on needs versus merit. Not only does it set people up for failure, it destroys the benefits of the free market system. Needs are subjective and can be manipulated, merit can’t.
Is there really merit anymore when a completely unrelated, 4 year degree is the base requirement for jobs that would have required a high school diploma or less a decade or two ago?
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.