Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

U.S. Justice Dept says Trump team may have moved classified papers amid probe

Published 08/30/2022, 11:31 PM
Updated 08/31/2022, 06:31 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: An aerial view of former U.S. President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago home after Trump said that FBI agents raided it, in Palm Beach, Florida, U.S. August 15, 2022. REUTERS/Marco Bello/File Photo

By Sarah N. Lynch and Dan Whitcomb

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Justice Department said it had evidence that classified documents were deliberately concealed from the FBI when it tried to retrieve them in June from former President Donald Trump's Florida estate, prompting its unprecedented search of his home.

In a 54-page filing, prosecutors on Tuesday laid out their evidence of obstruction of justice, alleging publicly for the first time that Trump aides both falsely certified in June that the former president had returned all the government records he had stored in his home after leaving the White House in January 2021.

It also revealed that Trump lawyers "explicitly prohibited government personnel from opening or looking inside any of the boxes" inside a storage room when FBI agents first traveled to his Palm Beach Mar-a-Lago resort in June to retrieve the records.

"The government also developed evidence that government records were likely concealed and removed from the Storage Room and that efforts were likely taken to obstruct the government’s investigation," the department said in a filing in U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Florida.

It released a photograph of some of the records found inside Trump's home bearing classification markings, some of which refer to clandestine human sources.

The Justice Department's filings come ahead of a Thursday court hearing before U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon in West Palm Beach. She is weighing Trump's request to appoint a special master who would conduct a privilege review of the documents seized from Mar-a-Lago on Aug. 8, many of which are labeled as classified.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

A special master is an independent third party sometimes appointed by a court in sensitive cases to review materials potentially covered by attorney-client privilege to ensure investigators do not improperly view them.

A special master was appointed, for instance, in the searches of the homes and offices of two of Trump's former attorneys: Rudy Giuliani and Michael Cohen.

In Trump's initial request to the court, his attorneys claimed that the former president wanted to protect materials that were subject to a legal doctrine known as executive privilege, which can shield some presidential communications.

Legal experts called that argument into question, saying it was illogical for a former president to claim he wanted to assert executive privilege against the executive branch itself.

Trump's legal team later narrowed its request, asking for a privilege review without explicitly referring to executive privilege.

The Justice Department on Tuesday said it opposed the appointment of a special master.

Trump, prosecutors argued, lacks standing in the case because the records "do not belong to him."

The Aug. 8 search of Trump's home was a significant escalation of one of several federal and state investigations Trump is facing.

In a redacted affidavit underpinning the search released publicly by the department last week, an unidentified FBI agent said the agency reviewed and identified 184 documents "bearing classification markings" after Trump in January returned 15 boxes of government records sought by the U.S. National Archives.

After the National Archives discovered the classified material, some of which pertained to intelligence-gathering and clandestine human sources, it referred the matter to the FBI.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The Justice Department said on Tuesday it tried multiple times to get all the records back.

But ultimately, it developed evidence to suggest more materials remained at Mar-a-lago and had been hidden from investigators.

The FBI subsequently carted away 33 additional boxes and other items during its Aug 8. search, some of which were marked as "top secret" - the classification level reserved for the country's most closely-held secrets.

Trump's defenses for why he retained the materials have shifted, and he has not offered a reason for why he did not give all the records back.

He has previously claimed he declassified all the records, pointing to a president's broad declassification powers.

However, Tuesday's filing by the government denied this.

"When producing the documents, neither counsel nor the custodian asserted that the former President had declassified the documents or asserted any claim of executive privilege," prosecutors wrote.

They also noted that when Jay Bratt, the head of the Justice Department's counterintelligence division, visited Mar-a-lago with the three agents in June to recover additional records, Trump's attorney handed over records "in a manner that suggested counsel believed that the documents were classified" by producing them in a "Redweld envelope" that was double-wrapped in tape.

Inside the envelope, the department said, were 38 unique documents with classification markings, 17 of which were "top secret," 16 of which were "secret" and 5 marked as "confidential."

Latest comments

I hope the government could figure out how many of the secret documents does putin already gotten!
trump's team is going to jail for lying and going through classified documents! unless of course they cooperate.
Anyone with common sense can see this political charade for what it is. it's just sad that people actually believe something of substance will come of it.
Wait, I thought they found evidence, now they found evidence of evidence being moved or concealed. Really. Anyone buying this baloney?They didnt find anything and now they are walking back saying it was moved in June when they raided the place. lol Team Biden is hard a t work. They are sensing the end.
What a gross misunderstanding.
What ever happened to the fbi finding the leaker of the SCOTUS ****ruling
lets see a scotus ruling overturning existing accepted law - or classified secrets improperly held - when the fbi knows who they will go after the scotus whistleblower - stumpys a traitor
The FBI was not investigating because its leak was not a crime. https://www.foxnews.com/us/leaking-scotus-opinion-roe-not-a-crime
Funny how people don't care about leaking classified documents anymore when it's their team that did it.
You may eat those word. You don't know with whom those documents were shared. But you do know - a smart guy like you - that the documents don't have to be classified to constitute espionage, one of the crimes the DOJ has said they are investigating.
But,but what about those Hillary's emails? Funny how people don't care about a leak of classified documents anymore when it's their team.
there will be a sheriff's sale for all his stuff he's just another Bernie Madoff
Trump is a thief and a lier
The justice department is a joke!
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/memorandum-declassification-certain-materials-related-fbis-crossfire-hurricane-investigation/
 if trump had said documents and they held anything meaningful - Barr would have prosecuted to the glee of the entire GOP - that didn't happen - you might remember Barr also said there was no meaningful voter fraud
@bob: Thanks for that link. That's interesting. Even if it relates to some of the documents its not the defense you think it is. Trump authorized the declassification of a redacted copy. The unredacted records remained classified. What did Trump have?
you dont pay your good lawyers, then you get the leftover incompetents! funny, with all his crimes, he goes to jail for obstruction! lmao
Paul, what are you talking about? When you say "what if Trump had done this to Obama" you're implying that Biden has done something to Trump? No. It's the DOJ directing the FBI, on authority of a judge. All legal, all just doing their jobs, and nothing to do with Biden. In addition, you're completely wrong when you say Obama kept classified documents after he left office. He didn't. The National Archives moved his presidential records to an archive facility in Chicago. Completely different scenario and all above board.
Expert in our midst. lol
We are a nation of laws. Trump didn't "Do this to Obama" because Obama did not break the law and Trump had no authority to direct an unfounded investigation of him. For Pete's sake, please tell me you are not an American citizen.
Why won't Trump offer a reason for not returning the records? Is it something he can't say aloud?
You do realize he has a civil lawsuit against Hillary Clinton. And all those who colluded with her (Obama, Biden, Comey, McCabe, Rice, etc.) to spy on his campaign and transition team and undermine his administration with a phiney Russian collusion narative will be brought to justice through discovery.
I dont know why I bother with you brainwashed Maddowed lunatics. Your clearly just cultural Marxists, Globalists, supporters of the New World Order of Neofeudalist Totalitarianism. Your fantasy is a life of slavery worshiping the Party of Davos. And your hero, the “Big Guy”, is a puppet for the demon Obama, George Soros (Satan incarnate) and Klaus Schwab his tool). Go eff yourselves and eff JB too.
Well, you sure seem to have it all figured out.
Might have, could possibly maybe and whatever. After the actions of the FBI over the last 6 years they have no credibility.
funny, FBI reports to DOJ and then to the president, the current head of FBI is appointed by The Orange Messiah himself, so if FBI is the swamp you are basically saying for 4 years The Donald didn't do his job to drain it???
The first 4 of those 6 years were under Trump. Sounds like he started the problem.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.