Breaking News
Investing Pro 0

U.S. House poised to pass same-sex marriage bill, showing shift in attitudes

World Dec 06, 2022 04:27PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A view of the U.S. Capitol building as the sunrises in Washington, U.S., February 10, 2022. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
 
LCO
-0.97%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

By Moira Warburton, Julia Harte and Joseph Ax

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A bill protecting federal recognition of same-sex marriages that has the support of both LGBT advocates and religious groups is expected to pass the U.S. House of Representatives this week with bipartisan support, a sign of a significant cultural shift in a divided nation.

Incoming House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters on Tuesday that the long-awaited legislation ought to clear the House in coming days.

Discussions among Democrats, Jeffries said, "Will continue to bear fruit as we will see later on this week when we pass the Respect for Marriage Act and send it to the president's desk for signing into law."

Democrats are rushing to pass as many bills as possible in the waning days of the 117th Congress, before Republicans take majority control of the House on Jan. 3 when the new Congress convenes.

The bill, which passed the U.S. Senate last week, was designed as a backstop to the 2015 Supreme Court ruling that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, known as Obergefell v. Hodges.

The legislation would allow the federal government to continue recognizing same-sex and interracial marriages in states where they were legally performed, should the court strike down Obergefell, a concern raised after the court ended the nationwide right to abortion in June.

A bipartisan amendment added in November affirmed that the bill would not subvert existing religious freedoms, helping quell initial opposition by conservatives. The bill, which was spearheaded by a group of Democratic and Republican senators, gained the backing of several national religious groups.

Paul Brandeis Raushenbush, an American Baptist reverend and president of Interfaith Alliance, said the support for the bill from religious groups showed that many had undergone a "remarkable transformation" in the way they perceive same-sex marriage.

He attributed the shift partly to the fact that such marriages had ceased to be unusual in the United States since the Supreme Court legalized them.

"The sky didn't fall because same-sex marriage began happening," said Raushenbush, who is in a same-sex marriage himself. "The specter of same-sex couples getting married no longer feels scary because it's quite commonplace."

The amendment's support from various religious groups that are theologically opposed to same-sex marriage reflects the fact that attitudes have changed, said Tim Schultz, the president of the 1st Amendment Partnership, which advocates for religious liberty.

"Fighting a permanent culture war over gay rights is not in their interest as religious organizations," he said. "They believe that seeking common ground is in the interest of religious freedom, the common good and how they portray their faith to the world."

Other religious groups, such as the Southern Baptist Convention, strongly opposed the legislation even after the religious freedom protections were added.

“The ability of (Baptist) organizations to follow their consciences as they carry out their work has already been a source of conflict,” Brent Leatherwood, president of the convention’s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, said. “Those waters will only be further muddied by [the law].”

Several conservative senators pushed back against this characterization of the bill, which ultimately received support from a dozen Republicans.

The legislation "offers far more in the way of religious liberty protections than currently under Obergefell, which leaves all such decisions up to the courts," Republican Senator Todd Young wrote in a newspaper opinion piece declaring his support for the bill last week.

The vote comes the day after the Supreme Court appeared ready to rule that a Christian Web designer has the right to refuse to provide services for same-sex marriages, in arguments challenging a Colorado law banning discrimination.

U.S. House poised to pass same-sex marriage bill, showing shift in attitudes
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (4)
DJ Puls
DJ Puls Dec 08, 2022 8:15AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
No kids means no population growth means too many jobs means higher inflation. Let in the imagrints.
DJ Puls
DJ Puls Dec 08, 2022 8:15AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
If we were all LGTBQ, one or two generations would wipe out the usa and help our enemies.
DJ Puls
DJ Puls Dec 08, 2022 8:15AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
We'll be fine though, as long as LGTBQ stays the minority.
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Dec 06, 2022 12:12PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
There is a bitter streak that runs through the American right, not completely unjustified in some cases, but this notion of if-I-can't-be-happy-nobody-can is a sickness.
Tre Hsi
Tre Hsi Dec 06, 2022 12:12PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
or "if I had to pay off my student loan and pay outrageous prices for my medications and live in polluted environment and pretend my gay son is straight, then all of you should too!"
Tom Saltzman
Tom Saltzman Dec 06, 2022 7:12AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Very few are against allowing consenting adults to live their lives. What I and many others are against is brining children into their adult activities. It's a sickness that must be stopped.
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Dec 06, 2022 7:12AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
What the helk are you talking about?
Tre Hsi
Tre Hsi Dec 06, 2022 7:12AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Brad Albright  well, the crazy guy does have a point, we can all agree we need to stop the "Bring your daughters to work Day" nonsense
gab nea
gab nea Dec 06, 2022 6:46AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
is the politically stacked maga supreme court working against the congress of the united states? they are deliberating a bigoted website designer hypothetical refusal to serve same ***couples, while congress is overwhelmingly voting to approve such marriages! besides they have nothing better to do?
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email