Breaking News
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

U.S. appeals court upholds $25 million Roundup verdict in blow to Bayer

WorldMay 14, 2021 07:10PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Monsanto Co's Roundup is shown for sale in Encinitas, California, U.S., June 26, 2017. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo

By Tom Hals

(Reuters) -A federal appeals court on Friday upheld a $25 million judgment and trial verdict finding Bayer (OTC:BAYRY)'s Roundup caused a California resident's non-Hodgkin lymphoma, dealing a blow to the chemical company's hopes of limiting its legal risk over the weed-killer.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco rejected Bayer's argument that lawsuits like Edwin Hardeman's never should go to trial because federal pesticide laws barred allegations that the company failed to warn of Roundup's cancer risks.

"It's a slam dunk for plaintiffs," said Leslie Brueckner, an attorney with Public Justice who helped with Hardeman's appeal. "This proves these claims are viable in the tort system."

Bayer did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

A jury in 2019 awarded Hardeman $5 million in compensatory damages and $75 million in punitive damages in the first federal case to have gone to trial. The punitive award was later cut to $20 million and the appeals court also upheld the reduction.

Friday's ruling was the first by a federal appeals court in a case linking Roundup and cancer and Bayer had said the case had the potential to "shape how every subsequent Roundup case is litigated."

Bayer has said that decades of studies have shown Roundup and other glyphosate-based herbicides that dominate the market are safe for human use.

The company has argued that glyphosate was approved by the Environmental Protection Agency as safe for humans and that regulators prevented Bayer from adding a warning to the product's label.

But the company has spent years trying to contain the litigation.

Bayer has committed $9.6 billion to settle 125,000 claims over Roundup.

It also wants to resolve potential legal claims of millions of consumers and farm workers who have been exposed to Roundup and might get sick in the future.

On Wednesday it will seek preliminary approval for a controversial $2 billion proposed deal to resolve those future claims through a class action that would group those exposed to Roundup but who haven't gotten sick.

Personal injury attorneys and consumer groups have opposed the plan, which they say limits the rights of Roundup users to sue.

Brueckner said Friday's ruling undermined one argument for the class action settlement, which was that Bayer might prevail in federal appeals courts.

"The timing couldn't be more perfect," said Brueckner, referring to Wednesday's hearing on the class action agreement. "I doubt it was accidental."

Elizabeth Cabraser, the class action attorney who negotiated the class action agreement, said she was pleased with Friday's ruling.

Proponents of the class action agreement argued that it provides consumers free medical exams to monitor their health. If consumers were diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, they could receive compensation worth up to $200,000 and free legal advice to assess their options.

The deal also pauses litigation against Bayer for four years and if someone rejected the compensation and sued, they could not seek punitive damages.

"The more verdicts against Bayer, the more pressure there is on the company to pull Roundup from the market or agree to a more generous settlement," said David Noll, a professor with Rutgers Law School.

U.S. appeals court upholds $25 million Roundup verdict in blow to Bayer

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Bill ODell
Bill ODell May 14, 2021 3:55PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco is a joke along with every other verdict they have rendered.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email