
Please try another search
By Daniel Wiessner
(Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday revived a sex discrimination claim against the University of Connecticut (UConn) by a former soccer player whose scholarship was revoked after she raised her middle finger to a television camera during a nationally broadcast championship game.
A three-judge panel of the New York City-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said a jury should decide whether UConn in 2014 punished Noriana Radwan more harshly, because of her gender, than male student-athletes who engaged in misconduct, as she alleges in a 2016 lawsuit.
A Connecticut federal judge had dismissed Radwan's claim that UConn violated Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which prohibits sex discrimination in federally funded education programs.
The 2nd Circuit affirmed the judge's dismissal of Radwan's separate claims that UConn violated her constitutional rights to free speech and due process by disciplining her.
UConn spokesperson Stephanie Reitz said the decision does not mean the school has been found to have discriminated against Radwan.
"The defendants are confident they will eventually prevail on that claim," she said.
Greg Tarone, a lawyer for Radwan, said he was pleased the court revived the discrimination claim and was reviewing the rest of the decision.
Radwan made the gesture while celebrating with her team after UConn defeated the University of South Florida to win a conference title. Radwan was suspended from further tournament games and ultimately lost her athletic scholarship.
The 2nd Circuit panel on Wednesday said Radwan's Title IX claim should move forward because she had shown that male scholarship athletes at UConn who engaged in misconduct faced far less serious consequences.
A male soccer player arrested for theft received a warning and a football player who kicked a dead ball into the stands during a game was not disciplined at all, the court said.
The case is Radwan v. University of Connecticut Board of Trustees, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 20-2194.
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.