Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Trump administration pushing to rip global supply chains from China: officials

Published 05/04/2020, 01:09 AM
Updated 05/04/2020, 03:35 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Containers of Chinese companies China Shipping and COSCO (China Ocean Shipping Company) are loaded on a container as it is leaving the port in Hamburg

By Humeyra Pamuk and Andrea Shalal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Trump administration is "turbocharging" an initiative to remove global industrial supply chains from China as it weighs new tariffs to punish Beijing for its handling of the coronavirus outbreak, according to officials familiar with U.S. planning.

President Donald Trump, who has stepped up recent attacks on China ahead of the Nov. 3 U.S. presidential election, has long pledged to bring manufacturing back from overseas.

Now, economic destruction and the massive U.S. coronavirus death toll are driving a government-wide push to move U.S. production and supply chain dependency away from China, even if it goes to other more friendly nations instead, current and former senior U.S. administration officials said.

"We’ve been working on [reducing the reliance of our supply chains in China] over the last few years but we are now turbo-charging that initiative," Keith Krach, undersecretary for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment at the U.S. State Department told Reuters.

"I think it is essential to understand where the critical areas are and where critical bottlenecks exist," Krach said, adding that the matter was key to U.S. security and one the government could announce new action on soon.

The U.S. Commerce Department, State and other agencies are looking for ways to push companies to move both sourcing and manufacturing out of China. Tax incentives and potential re-shoring subsidies are among measures being considered to spur changes, the current and former officials told Reuters.

“There is a whole of government push on this,” said one. Agencies are probing which manufacturing should be deemed "essential" and how to produce these goods outside of China.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Trump's China policy has been defined by behind-the-scenes tussles between pro-trade advisers and China hawks; now the latter say their time has come.

"This moment is a perfect storm; the pandemic has crystallized all the worries that people have had about doing business with China," said another senior U.S. official.

"All the money that people think they made by making deals with China before, now they’ve been eclipsed many fold by the economic damage" from the coronavirus, the official said.

ECONOMIC PROSPERITY NETWORK

Trump has said repeatedly that he could put new tariffs on top of the up to 25% tax on $370 billion in Chinese goods currently in place.

U.S. companies, which pay the tariffs, are already groaning https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-tariffs/trumps-tariffs-add-to-pandemic-induced-turmoil-of-u-s-manufacturers-idUSKBN22C1MY under the existing ones, especially as sales plummet during coronavirus lockdowns.

But that does not mean Trump will balk at new ones, officials say. Other ways to punish China may include sanctions on officials or companies, and closer relations with Taiwan, the self-governing island China considers a province.

But discussions about moving supply chains are concrete, robust, and, unusually for the Trump administration, multi-lateral.

The United States is pushing to create an alliance of "trusted partners" dubbed the "Economic Prosperity Network," one official said. It would include companies and civil society groups operating under the same set of standards on everything from digital business, energy and infrastructure to research, trade, education and commerce, he said.

The U.S. government is working with Australia, India, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea and Vietnam to "move the global economy forward," Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said April 29.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

These discussions include “how we restructure ... supply chains to prevent something like this from ever happening again," Pompeo said.

Latin America may play a role, too.

Colombian Ambassador Francisco Santos last month said he was in discussions with the White House, National Security Council, U.S. Treasury Department and U.S. Chamber of Commerce about a drive to encourage U.S. companies to move some supply chains out of China and bring them closer to home.

China overtook the United States as the world's top manufacturing country in 2010, and was responsible for 28% of global output in 2018, according to United Nations data.

The pandemic has highlighted China's key role in the supply chain for generic drugs https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-pharmaceuticals-ap/chinas-coronavirus-induced-supply-chain-woes-fan-concerns-of-possible-drug-shortages-idUSKBN20Y1C7 that account for the majority of prescriptions in the United States. It has also shown China's dominance in goods like https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-amazon-com-cameras/exclusive-amazon-turns-to-chinese-firm-on-u-s-blacklist-to-meet-thermal-camera-needs-idUSKBN22B1AL the thermal cameras needed to test workers for fevers, and its importance in food supplies.

HARD SELL FOR COMPANIES

Many U.S. companies have invested heavily in Chinese manufacturing and rely on China's 1.4 billion people for a big chunk of their sales.

"Diversification and some redundancy in supply chains will make sense given the level of risk that the pandemic has uncovered," said Doug Barry, spokesman for the U.S.-China Business Council. "But we don’t see a wholesale rush for the exits by companies doing business in China."

John Murphy, senior vice president for international policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said that U.S. manufacturers already meet 70% of current pharmaceutical demand.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Building new facilities in the United States could take five to eight years, he said. "We're concerned that officials need to get the right fact sets before they start looking at alternatives," Murphy said.

Trump White House pledges to punish China have not always been followed by action.

A move to block global exports of chips to blacklisted Chinese telecoms giant Huawei, for example, favored by hawks in the administration and under consideration since November, has not yet been finalized.

Latest comments

Trump had 4 years during that time he did nothing to rip the global supply chain from the offspring of Mao. This is only hot air words blown in the hope of winning a rapidly approaching election. Trump failed badly because he did not stick to his guns. He knew this "virus" is a planned event yet he refused to call it out in public. in addition, Trump the nation's top capitalist suddenly became the number one socialist in All of American history. Rather than let the market place sort out the winners and the losers Trump decided he would print up 6 trillion dollars and channel a good portion of the money to his team.Shall I continue ?
All this storry doesnt make sense what is happening to the world today or even before the virus doesnt make sensechina has been manufacturing for USA for the last 100 years, so now because trump doesnt wanna rely on them anymore, he is not allowed to dump them like this even if it is first goal since he was elected, that wont happen USA has been controlling the world for long time , but can have it allpeople should finally understand this NO ONE CAN HAVE IT ALL
A good chance to find a new vendor who doesnt spray poison on its wood floor products, so that children don't get sickened from it.
I must be confused because Mr. Trump would always call "China" his friend, but now he wants to stab them in the back something doesn't make sense!
it's like trump is now desperate to blame his mistakes handling of the economy and the corona disaster
With the decline of the USA in the world that has been assuming the current American policy first, these ideological approaches with China are not realistic, and the only thing they can follow is to further curtail the global position of the nation, leaving the world primacy in the hands of China. .
trump has completed the EXACT opposite of his promise ....he has decimated our manufacturing and it is now at a 100 year LOW compared to our economy we have been in a manufacturing recession for over TWO years now because of these trade wars that produced nothing
It takes time for manufacturing to reshape its structure, and during that restructuring, there's going to be economic instability, but in the end, if the country toughs through the instability, it will be in a better place than the economic position the past 6 presidents or so have put us in by encouraging outsourcing.  Sooner or later the country needs to face the shortfalls of its poor government.  You can either face it now when it's a mild burden on the economy, or wait for the sudden and complete collapse of your social structure when not only manufacturing leaves your country but research, shipping, and sales as well.  But what do I care?  I can speak Chinese just fine.
how? becuz a virus came out of a Wigan lab to destroy American so blame Trump? a concerted world wide globalist effort to rid Trump from office and put the world under lockdown? the never ending witch hunts didnt do a thing but distract from the real plan.. go watch more VNN nimrod
started with Clinton....GWB..Obama...Trump...Every other point you made is exactly spot on!!
i lost my love for USA especially under Trump .. i wonder whether it will go back to be the respectable global leader again ...
You’re surely not missed.
News flash.  It hasn't been a respectable global leader since WW2.  The other countries of the world are not our allies and never have been.  They have been forced to fake a smile at us because of all the countries, we were the ones that were not devastated by WW2, and as such became a safe haven for all the top scientists escaping Europe, granting us a huge boom in technology and wealth over the next 50 years.  The second major country that was least devastated was Russia, and we got into petty squabbles with them over the same 50 years.  The one thing that is truly exemplary of modern America is the fact that their people still are delusional into thinking that the rest of the world likes us.   America is like the kid from the story of the prodigal son.  He takes his father's inheritance that he did not earn, then goes out, makes a bunch of fake friends that only like him for his money and spends all his money on them thinking they're friends when in fact they're mooches.
what's wrong with you m Loo ???? get your facts right @!!! under previous administrations especial ly under your beloved obama ,the US was the laughingstock of our adversaries aka Russia ,China,mid east terror groups Your pres mr O will go down in history as a 0 in foreign affairs along with his beloved Hillary. Trump in 2020
Let’s at least get our medicines out of China
You all fragile like a biscuit still want fight? Take care your Death toll better
if they really can make medicines, i think we can't beileve their medicines too. they have to compansate some money to making vaccines.
70% of your medicine is produced in the USA.. Duh
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.