Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Republicans want Biden home visitor logs - but not Trump's

Published 01/15/2023, 12:01 PM
Updated 01/15/2023, 06:05 PM
© Reuters. Secret Service personnel park vehicles in the driveway leading to U.S. President Joe Biden's house after classified documents were reported found there by the White House in Wilmington, Delaware, U.S., January 14, 2023. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

© Reuters. Secret Service personnel park vehicles in the driveway leading to U.S. President Joe Biden's house after classified documents were reported found there by the White House in Wilmington, Delaware, U.S., January 14, 2023. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

By Doina Chiacu

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Republican chairman of the House Oversight Committee on Sunday demanded visitor logs for President Joe Biden's house in Wilmington, Delaware, after classified documents were found in his office and garage.

"Without a list of individuals who have visited his residence, the American people will never know who had access to these highly sensitive documents," Representative James Comer said in a letter to White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain dated Sunday.

Republicans have sought to compare the Biden documents case, which involves material from his time as vice president, with that of former President Donald Trump, who faces a federal criminal probe of how he handled classified documents after he left the White House in 2021. But legal experts say there are stark contrasts between the two cases.

Comer said he would not seek visitor logs for Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence, where more than 100 classified documents - some of them labeled top secret - were found in an FBI search.

"I don't feel like we need to spend a whole lot of time because the Democrats have done that for the past six years," he said in an interview Sunday with CNN.

Trump has announced he would seek the presidency again in 2024, with Biden as his expected Democratic rival.

The Biden disclosures emerged last week after his legal team said it had found classified documents relating to his time as vice president in the Obama administration at his Delaware home. His lawyers on Saturday reported finding five additional pages at his home.

Top secret material was included in some of the 10 or so documents found at the Penn Biden Center think tank, CBS reported on Sunday, citing an unidentified law enforcement source. The White House had no comment on the report. A representative for Biden's personal lawyer, Bob Bauer, did not return a request for comment.

There is no legal requirement that U.S. presidents disclose visitors at their home or at the White House. The Biden administration reinstated disclosures of official guests to the White House and released its first batch of records in May 2021. Former President Donald Trump had suspended the practice shortly after he took office in 2017.

TRUMP VS. BIDEN DOCUMENT ISSUES

Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives launched an investigation on Friday into the Justice Department's handling of improperly stored classified documents possessed by Biden. Comer's committee is also reviewing the case.

The investigation comes as Trump is under federal criminal investigation for mishandling classified documents after his presidency.

In the Biden case, the president's lawyers informed the National Archives and Justice Department about finding a small number of documents at a think tank in Washington and later at Biden's Wilmington home.

In Trump's case, the National Archives tried for more than a year after Trump left office to retrieve all of the records he retained, without success. When Trump finally returned 15 boxes of documents in January 2022, Archives officials discovered they contained classified materials.

After the matter was referred to the Justice Department, Trump's lawyers handed over more material from Trump's Mar-a-Lago home and said there were no more documents on the premises.

That turned out to be false. In the end, the FBI recovered an additional 13,000 documents, about 100 of which were marked classified, from the estate.

House Democrats introduced the "Mar-a-Lago Act" in 2017 that would require Trump to regularly disclose visitors to his Florida home, but it was never voted on in the chamber or full Congress.

© Reuters. Secret Service personnel park vehicles in the driveway leading to U.S. President Joe Biden's house after classified documents were reported found there by the White House in Wilmington, Delaware, U.S., January 15, 2023. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

Democratic Representative Adam Schiff, the outgoing House Intelligence Committee chairman, said Congress should seek an assessment from the U.S. intelligence community on whether any documents, from either Trump or Biden, jeopardized national security.

"I don't think we can exclude the possibility without knowing more of the facts," Schiff said on ABC's "This Week."

Latest comments

Prepare the popcorns GOP as usual provides the crazy comedy show trying to mobilize more QUANON members with new conspiracy theories….nobody told them that they where elected to work for USA and make life better for the americans…they prefer to spend time on crazy comedy
"Comer said he would not seek visitor logs for Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence....."  -- yeah, nothing to see there, move along, move along
the Republicans only love their criminals!
hypocrisy and double standards, a republican staple..
Do the Democrats want an FBI raid on Biden's other properties or Hunter's house?
not necessary, unlike trump they are cooperating with the law
The search of Trump's home was legally conducted after a judge found probable cause that a crime had been committed and issued a search warrent. If law enforcement has probable cause that Biden's houses contain evidence of a crime, then they should absolutely seek a search warrent.
sure, I think there should be a raid, but only after Biden's lawyers send a letter confirming their client is not holding any classified documents, you know, like that letter sent out by the crack Trump legal team
Just because Trump's docs were previously marked classified does not mean they were still classified when he left office. The President, and not the VP, has unilateral authority to declassify.
Well, you are wrong again, or don't understand the meaning of unilateral.
stephen, you have proved time and again you know next to nothing at all
They are cowards.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.