Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Ohio can enforce ban on Down syndrome abortions: U.S. appeals court

Published 04/13/2021, 12:08 PM
Updated 04/13/2021, 05:05 PM
© Reuters. A gavel and a block is pictured at the George Glazer Gallery antique store in this illustration picture taken in Manhattan, New York City

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that Ohio can enforce a 2017 law banning abortions when medical tests show that a fetus has Down syndrome.

In a 9-7 decision, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati said the law did not create a substantial obstacle to obtaining abortions, was reasonably related to Ohio's legitimate interests, and was "valid in all conceivable cases."

Another federal appeals court declared a similar Arkansas law unconstitutional in January. The split could prompt the Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority to take up the issue.

Arkansas' Republican Attorney General Leslie Rutledge on Tuesday asked the Supreme Court to review the January ruling.

Ohio's law subjects doctors to license revocations and up to 18 months in prison for performing abortions on women they knew decided to abort at least in part because Down syndrome was in the fetus, or had reason to believe the condition was present.

Tuesday's decision reversed an October 2019 ruling by a divided three-judge 6th Circuit panel that said the law, House Bill 214, unlawfully prevented some women from obtaining pre-viability abortions.

Ohio's law had been challenged by Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers.

"This abortion ban inserts politicians between patients and their doctors, denying services to those who need it," Planned Parenthood president Alexis McGill Johnson said.

Down syndrome is a genetic disorder where a person has an extra chromosome. Symptoms include cognitive impairment, slower physical growth, a flat face, a small head, a short neck and poor muscle tone.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Circuit Judge Alice Batchelder, who wrote Tuesday's majority opinion, said Ohio's law promoted the state's interests in destigmatizing Down syndrome children, and encouraging doctors to respond to such diagnoses with "care and healing."

The dissenters said the decision turns House Bill 214 into a "don't ask, don't tell" law for doctors and pregnant women.

Circuit Judge Bernice Bouie Donald accused the majority of demonstrating unconcealed "hostility" toward Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision establishing a constitutional right to abortion.

The case is Preterm-Cleveland et a v McCloud et al, 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 18-3329.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.