Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

In wake of U.S. Capitol attack, some law firms decline to halt political contributions

Published 01/19/2021, 06:32 AM
Updated 01/19/2021, 11:35 AM
© Reuters

© Reuters

By Caroline Spiezio

(Reuters) - While major corporations and some law firms stopped contributions to lawmakers after the deadly Jan. 6 siege of the U.S. Capitol, few of the legal industries' most powerful political spenders have publicly taken similar steps.

Five people including a police officer lost their lives as supporters of President Donald Trump stormed the seat of Congress, fueled by Trump's baseless claims of voter fraud.

Firms including Covington & Burling, outside counsel for President-elect Joe Biden's campaign, and lobbying giants Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld and Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck issued statements condemning the violence, but stopped short of pledging to suspend donations from their political action committees.

The PACs of the three firms, which wield significant influence in Washington, D.C., were among the ten highest spending for individual law firms in the 2020 election cycle, which overall contributed about $3.2 million, according to the Center for Responsive Politics' OpenSecrets website. The donations from the ten firms were roughly split among Republican and Democratic lawmakers.

All ten firms gave to at least one of the Republican lawmakers who voted against certifying Biden's election victory in the hours following the riot, according to OpenSecrets.

Separately, the PAC for the American Association for Justice, a lobbying organization for plaintiffs' lawyers, gave over $2.1 million, almost all to Democrats, OpenSecrets said.

The financial impact of law firm political contributions is "a drop in the bucket," said Michael Miller, an assistant professor of political science at Barnard College, in an email. But these firms' decisions could help send "a clear message about acceptable behavior, that may potentially give bad actors pause."

Just three of the ten top-spending individual law firm PACs publicly suspended contributions in response to the Jan. 6 attack. Squire Patton Boggs and Holland & Knight, which have substantial lobbying arms, froze all contributions, while Cozen O'Connor halted contributions to lawmakers who voted against certifying Biden's victory.

Covington said in a statement that it is undertaking "a comprehensive review of (its) political contributions and policies." The incoming Biden administration has tapped a Covington attorney as special assistant to the president and chief of staff for the Office of Legislative Affairs.

Brownstein said it will review its policies on political giving "to ensure that they reflect our firm's values."

Akin Gump said its PAC "will certainly consider the riotous events in Washington, D.C., and the false rhetoric questioning the legitimacy of the recent elections as part of a broad array of factors when determining our PAC giving priorities."

McGuireWoods, another top spending firm, said it is suspending federal level contributions, citing "the new Congress and new year."

The American Association for Justice did not return a request for comment about whether it was halting contributions. Neither did Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough and Maynard, Cooper & Gale, whose political action committees also rank among the top ten for law firms. K&L Gates declined to comment.

As individuals, attorneys generally overwhelmingly donate to Democrats, federal election data shows.

Latest comments

didn't Mitch McConnell just condemned Trump for lying about the election and feeding baseless claims to the mob??
Roughly half the country believes [knows] the election of Joe Biden was illegitimate. They hope people are going to forget and move on. That’s not going to happen.
They merely need to look at the overwhelming evidence - that is censored by Big Tech because they are just as compromised by the CCP as the ‘Big Guy’ is.
Bobbi there is no overwhelming evidence.
Bob Collins....the country was lied too by far right and Russian operatives, you know, like you and Trump the loser.
“baseless claims of voter fraud” is the official CCP/DNC propaganda tagline.
As Reuters grandly pronounce that Trump’s claims of a stolen election are “baseless”, 78 MM Americans who saw the progress of voting and the handling of mail-in balloting (esp. in GA) disagree. Oh, and Reuters disagrees with the opinions of the Attornies General of seven states as well. But we can safely believe the unbiased writers for a German-based information source, because they have....what? The facts were never investigated
Story written from angle that writer wonders why more people arent holding back money from people who were exercising thier constitutional rights. Another hack writer trying trying to create narrative.
there should be no political donations on both sides....it's bribery.
legal bribery in USA
Enfin.. The good sense arrive.. No time populism résolve thé réal problms..
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.