Harvard says Trump administration doubled down after sending letter reported as unauthorized

Published 04/19/2025, 04:13 PM
Updated 04/19/2025, 04:15 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Students walk on the campus of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S., April 15, 2025.   REUTERS/Faith Ninivaggi/File Photo

By Kanishka Singh

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Harvard said on Saturday the Trump administration was "doubling down" on far-reaching demands on the university despite a published report that government officials had sent a letter spelling out those demands without authorization.

The letter from government lawyers, received by Harvard on April 11, was sent before senior officials of U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration could approve it or give the go-ahead for its release, the New York Times (NYSE:NYT) reported late on Friday, citing unnamed sources familiar with the matter.

Three days after that letter arrived, Harvard rejected numerous demands that it said would amount to the school giving up control over hiring, admissions and instruction to the government.

The Trump administration subsequently froze $2.3 billion in funding to Harvard and threatened to strip Harvard of its tax-exempt status and take away its ability to enroll foreign students. It also demanded information on the university’s foreign ties, students and faculty.

"Even assuming the administration now wishes to take back its litany of breathtakingly intrusive demands, it appears to have doubled down on those demands through its deeds in recent days," a Harvard spokesperson said. "Actions speak louder than words."

Since his January inauguration, Trump has cracked down on top U.S. universities, saying they mishandled last year’s pro-Palestinian protests and allowed antisemitism to fester on campus. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say their criticism of Israel’s actions in Gaza is wrongly conflated with antisemitism.

Columbia University was an early target but in recent weeks, the administration has focused on Harvard, where it is seeking oversight of its student body, faculty and curriculum in an apparent effort to curb what it perceives as the university’s liberal bias.

The content of the April 11 letter was authentic but the New York Times reported differing accounts inside the Trump administration of how it was mishandled.

The newspaper said some at the White House believed the letter was sent prematurely while others thought it was meant to be first circulated among government officials.

The White House had no immediate comment.

The administration had already sent a list of demands on April 3 to Harvard for the elite school to continue receiving federal funding. These included a mask ban, removal of diversity, equity and inclusion programs, and more cooperation with law enforcement.

The April 11 letter signed by officials at the Education Department, Health Department and General Services Administration expanded that list. It told Harvard to stop recognizing some pro-Palestinian groups and asked it to report to federal authorities foreign students violating university policies, among other demands.

Harvard had believed it could still avoid confrontation with the Trump administration because they were engaged in dialogue, the newspaper said, but the letter made Harvard feel a deal was not possible.

Harvard said it did not doubt the letter’s authenticity and called its demands "astonishing in their overreach."

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.