Breaking News
0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Senate Democrats 'encouraged' on voting rights bill, McConnell opposed

WorldJun 17, 2021 07:12PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Voting rights activists gather during a protest against Texas legislators who are advancing a slew of new voting restrictions in Austin, Texas, U.S., May 8, 2021. REUTERS/Mikala Compton/File Photo

By Richard Cowan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Senate Democrats scrambled to unite around a sweeping election reform bill they hope to begin debating next week, in the face of Republican opposition and moves by several states to pass laws placing new restrictions on voting.

Several Democrats expressed optimism over a compromise plan proposed by moderate Democratic Senator Joe Manchin, details of which were released on Wednesday.

"I am encouraged by these recent developments," Senator Raphael Warnock of Georgia told reporters. Georgia is one of a half-dozen U.S. states that passed tough new controls on voting procedures https://www.reuters.com/world/us/republicans-erect-voting-barriers-across-number-politically-crucial-us-states-2021-06-15 this year.

Warnock said Manchin's ideas were "very significant" because they could unite the 48 Senate Democrats and two independents, boosting chances for passing a bill.

It was not yet clear whether any Republicans would climb aboard, however. Under normal Senate rules, 60 votes are needed in the 100-member chamber to pass any measure.

A crucial test vote will be held on Tuesday on whatever bill Democrats agree upon in the next few days, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters.

Democrats hope to get at least all of their 50 caucus members to vote yes on opening debate. That, however, would be 10 short of the senators needed to clear a first hurdle.

But 50 would demonstrate Democratic unity on one of their highest legislative priorities and could even encourage more in their party to join a move to scrap or alter the Senate's rule requiring the 60-vote threshold to advance bills.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell on Thursday rejected the idea of compromise, saying "states, not the federal government, should decide how to run their own elections."

Democrats argue that they also support state-run elections, but with minimum federal standards.

Republican-controlled state legislatures say new restrictions on voting are needed to improve election security following former President Donald Trump's repeated claims that his election defeat was the result of widespread fraud.

Although multiple courts, state election officials and Trump's own administration have rejected the claims as untrue and Trump has not produced any evidence, a sizable number of Republican voters believe him anyway, polls show.

Democrat Amy Klobuchar, who chairs a Senate committee overseeing election procedures in the United States, called Manchin's compromise "a good faith effort."

She stopped short of embracing it and instead said, "We'll continue to work through his ideas."

But she noted that Manchin's plan contains key elements in a bill that has been pushed by Democratic leaders, including making "dark money" campaign contributions public and requiring that states give voters at least two weeks to cast their ballots in presidential and congressional elections.

Republican Senator Mike Lee said he believed the voting rights bill would hurt his party's electoral chances: "This bill isn't about strengthening democracy. This bill is about strengthening Democrats."

The issue is urgent for Democrats, who hold razor-thin majorities in both houses of Congress after the 2020 elections. History and a once-a-decade redistricting process, based on the 2020 U.S. Census, favor Republicans' chances of recapturing control of Congress in the 2022 midterm elections.

"If we don't get this bill passed, our democratic system is on the line. Voting is fundamental," said Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren.

'UNDER ASSAULT'

The flurry of state initiatives restricting voting is playing out in presidential election swing states, including Pennsylvania, Florida and Arizona.

"We've been tracking voting legislation for well over a decade and we have not seen a push this aggressive and intense before," said Wendy Weiser, an elections expert at the non-partisan Brennan Center for Justice. "Voting rights are under assault."

Senate Democrats' drive for passage of the For the People bill approved by the House of Representatives in March hit a wall with Manchin's opposition.

That sweeping measure would block many of the restrictions imposed by new state laws and require states to turn over the task of redrawing congressional districts to independent commissions.

Democrats' backup plan could be an expanded version of another bill, named after the late civil rights leader and congressman John Lewis, that would omit some of the larger bill's more sweeping changes, such as having commissions redraw congressional districts.

Senate Democrats 'encouraged' on voting rights bill, McConnell opposed
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (7)
Silence Dogood
Silence Dogood Jun 17, 2021 9:40PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
NATIONAL CITIZENSHIP / VOTING IDs are the only thing that will restore faith in American elections. Everyone knows that. States settling for anything less are fascist led SHs.
Me comment
Me comment Jun 17, 2021 9:19PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Republicans only want voter reform that reduced voter turnout and make it harder for those who do cast a ballot. They figure that will give them the best chance to win.
Yankee Steve
Yankee Steve Jun 17, 2021 8:08PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
US id not an advance country but have their ********backward. Europe, Asisn and ME countries required userid to vote but not here. Go figure
Nordin Mohamad
Nordin Mohamad Jun 17, 2021 7:12PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
may be the last 200 years most of the usa president selected based on cheated vote..???
Michael Becker
Michael Becker Jun 17, 2021 7:09PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
How about no IDs to get into any Democrat event.
Felipe Daniel
Felipe Daniel Jun 17, 2021 3:26PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Democrats want to cheat
Bob Collins
Bob Collins Jun 17, 2021 7:56AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
“President Donald Trump's repeated false claims that his election defeat was the result of widespread fraud” … 51% of American know the truth. The lawsuits that are coming against these state propagana outlets like Reuters are going to be staggering.
Joel Schwartz
Joel Schwartz Jun 17, 2021 7:56AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
There were like 60 investigations that turned up zero evidence of fraud. But you and your 4chan group know the truth, huh? *taps tinfoil hat*
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email