Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
💎 Access the Market Tools Trusted by Thousands of Investors Get Started

China seeks dialogue, says clash with US would be 'unbearable disaster'

Published Jun 03, 2023 09:15PM ET Updated Jun 04, 2023 03:51AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. China’s Defence Minister Li Shangfu attends the 20th IISS Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore June 2, 2023. REUTERS/Caroline Chia

By Chen Lin and Kanupriya Kapoor

SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Chinese Defence Minister Li Shangfu told Asia's top security summit on Sunday that conflict with the United States would be an "unbearable disaster" but that his country sought dialogue over confrontation.

Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Li said the world was big enough for China and the U.S. to grow together - remarks made days after he refused to meet his U.S. counterpart for direct talks.

"China and the U.S. have different systems and are different in many other ways," he said in a speech that marked his first significant international address since he was named China's Minister of National Defence in March.

"However, this should not keep the two sides from seeking common ground and common interests to grow bilateral ties and deepen cooperation," he said. "It is undeniable that a severe conflict or confrontation between China and the U.S. will be an unbearable disaster for the world."

Wearing the general's uniform of the People's Liberation Army, Li made his address on the 34th anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown.

Ties between Washington and Beijing are badly strained over a range of issues, including democratically governed Taiwan, territorial disputes in the South China Sea and President Joe Biden's restrictions on semiconductor chip exports.

As delegates at the summit debated the risks of accidents and miscalculations amid those tensions, the U.S. Navy said a Chinese destroyer made "unsafe" manoeuvres near a U.S. warship in the Taiwan Straits on Saturday, highlighting the dangers.

China's military criticised the United States and Canada for "deliberately provoking risk" after their warships staged a rare joint sailing through the sensitive strait.

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command said U.S. and Canadian ships were operating routinely and under high-seas freedoms.

Canadian defence minister Anita Anand said that Canada would continue to sail where international law allows, including the Strait, and that "actors in this region must engage responsibly”.

In his speech, Li said China would not allow such freedom-of-navigation patrols by the United States and its allies to be "a pretext to exercise hegemony of navigation."

After his remarks, regional scholars asked Li repeatedly about the incident as well as China's extensive maritime deployments in the disputed South China Sea. He did not answer them directly, saying moves by countries outside the region were raising tensions.

Richard Marles, Australian deputy prime minister and defence minister, said his country's efforts to improve its military capabilities and presence in the region were aimed at "playing our part in contributing to the collective security of the Pacific and the maintenance of the rules-based order".

"It is a point I made that we have repeatedly made to the region and to the world since we announced the optimal pathway to acquiring nuclear powered submarine capability," he said on the sidelines of the security meeting, referring to the AUKUS pact with the United States and Britain.

U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin rebuked China in a speech at the summit on Saturday for refusing to hold military talks, leaving the superpowers deadlocked over their differences.

Austin said dialogue "is not a reward, but a necessity".

Li was more restrained in his address, although he took thinly veiled digs at the United States, accusing "some countries" of intensifying an arms race and wilfully interfering in the internal affairs of others.

"A Cold War mentality is now resurgent, greatly increasing security risks," he said. "Mutual respect should prevail over bullying and hegemony."

Li, sanctioned by the United States in 2018 over weapons purchases from Russia, shook hands with Austin at a dinner on Friday but the two have not had a deeper discussion, despite repeated U.S. demands for more military exchanges.

Alongside the speeches and panel discussions, senior intelligence officials from both sides attended a secret meeting of spy chiefs in Singapore on the fringes of the summit, Reuters reported on Sunday.

After Li's speech, retired veteran Chinese diplomat Cui Tiankai urged the United States to ease military deployments close to China in an act of "good faith" if high-level defence talks between the two superpowers are to resume.

Chong Ja Ian, a political scientist at the National University of Singapore, said that Li's approach and tone appeared gentler than that of Chinese positions stated at previous summits but that "the content was the same".

"It was a reflection of the distance between the U.S. and the PRC, which also suggests that any hope that there will be some resolution is naive. U.S., PRC competition is here to stay,” he said.

China seeks dialogue, says clash with US would be 'unbearable disaster'
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (2)
Tomek Mi
Tomek Mi Jun 04, 2023 3:21AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
dont forget - Chinese are like Putin. if they say no they mean Yes and vice versa:) have a nice sunday
Cin Guan
Cin Guan Jun 04, 2023 3:21AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
really? not US say yes to China then US became a Betrayer? 🤣🤣🤣
Tomek Mi
Tomek Mi Jun 04, 2023 3:21AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
nope
Dennis Chuck
Dennis Chuck Jun 04, 2023 12:20AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The americans and the west should start to respect other countries culture and rules. Dont push and propagate your imperialism into others throat! Do you like when china ask you to return whatever you americans have been taken away from the red indians???
rob finch
rob finch Jun 04, 2023 12:20AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Actually Columbus was mistaken. Due to genetic testing we have found these "red indians" are much closer to mongolians. more common ground.
rob finch
rob finch Jun 04, 2023 12:20AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
but now I can only think of a time when conquest was the rule by which the game was played and walls were built that can be seen from outer space. I'm glad those times are hundreds of years in the past.
Martijn WN
Speculeerbeer Jun 04, 2023 12:20AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I do think the US are imperialistic and basically the world's biggest bully, that's why I'd rather have them on my side, but as a European I'd rather see us become self reliant, in terms of defence and resources. Having said that, I do respect other cultures, but I don't respect autocratic systems. China's regime is out to fully control its people. That's why they will never be as innovative as liberal democracies. Innovation comes from freedom, not from control.
Sylvia Doloff
Sylvia Doloff Jun 04, 2023 12:20AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
you are clueless and un informed is the reality your insinuation is far off base go back to school sell your kia and learn the truth of tye communist party
Jake Vee
Jake Vee Jun 04, 2023 12:20AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Sorry, I’m not interested respecting a government that harvest peoples organs and sells them on the black market because they didn’t assimilate.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email