Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Top Senate Republican blasts Biden's 'rant' on voter rights, vows to oppose bill

WorldJan 12, 2022 07:56PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. U.S. President Joe Biden tours a neighborhood in Louisville, Colorado, U.S., January 7, 2022. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

By Richard Cowan and Jeff Mason

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Top U.S. Senate Republican Mitch McConnell on Wednesday blasted President Joe Biden's push for a voting-rights bill, underscoring the difficulty Biden's Democrats face in trying to steer legislation through a Congress they narrowly control.

Biden has called for Democrats to jettison the chamber's longstanding "filibuster https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-senate-democrats-mull-ending-filibuster-pass-voting-rights-reform-2022-01-11" rule requiring 60 of the 100 senators to agree to advance most legislation, a move that McConnell said would irreparably damage the Senate.

"The president's rant yesterday was incoherent, incorrect and beneath his office," McConnell said on the Senate floor, referring to Biden's speech in Atlanta on Tuesday in which he appealed for voting-rights legislation and called Republicans cowardly for not supporting it.

McConnell accused the president of giving "a deliberately divisive speech that was designed to pull our country further apart."

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki told reporters the administration was disappointed by McConnell's opposition to the bill.

"It is even more disappointing that someone who has supported and advocated for voting rights in the past ... is on the other side of this argument now," Psaki said.

Biden plans to make a personal plea to Senate Democrats on Thursday, urging them to agree on changing or eliminating the filibuster so they can pass the voting rights bill.

Former President Donald Trump's false claims that his 2020 election defeat was the result of fraud inspired a wave of new restrictions on voting in Republican-controlled states last year.

Democrats see their voting rights bills as a last chance to counter those ahead of the Nov. 8 elections, when they run the risk of losing their razor-thin majorities in at least one chamber of Congress.

Since Trump's defeat, Republican lawmakers in 19 states have passed dozens of laws making it harder to vote. Critics say these measures target minorities, who vote in greater proportions for Democrats.

The Freedom to Vote Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act together would make Election Day a holiday, expand access to mail-in voting and strengthen U.S. Justice Department oversight of local election jurisdictions with a history of discrimination.

"Twelve months ago the president said that politics need not be a raging fire destroying everything in its path," McConnell said. "But yesterday he poured a giant can of gasoline on the fire."

Republicans argue that the bills Democrats are proposing are an infringement of states' rights to run their elections. They come as Trump supporters https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fundraising-surges-races-us-election-oversight-roles-report-says-2022-01-12 who have embraced his false claims of election fraud are running for offices that could give them oversight over local elections. Democrats and election analysts have raised concerns that they could use those posts to influence https://www.reuters.com/world/us/backers-trumps-false-fraud-claims-seek-control-next-us-elections-2021-09-22 election outcomes.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on Wednesday outlined a strategy to ensure a Senate floor debate on voting rights, after three separate attempts last year were stymied by Republicans.

Under the plan, outlined in a Schumer memo to fellow Democrats that was seen by Reuters, the House of Representatives will soon repackage two election-related bills into one and pass it. It would then go to the Senate under a special procedure preventing Republicans from blocking debate.

"We will finally have an opportunity to debate voting rights legislation – something that Republicans have thus far denied," Schumer wrote in the memo.

But if Republicans remain united in opposition, even that bill will not pass the Senate unless all Democrats agree to change the filibuster, he said.

Centrist Democratic Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema are opposed to the idea, saying it would cause turmoil with every change of control in Washington.

Schumer has set a deadline for a vote on the election reforms by the Jan. 17 holiday honoring the slain civil rights hero Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

EROSION OF FILIBUSTER

For at least a decade, worries about atrophy in the Senate have led to calls for revising or scrapping the filibuster, which allows a minority of senators to block bills.

In 2013, Democrats, fed up with then-President Barack Obama's nominees languishing amid Republican filibusters, scrapped the 60-vote majority needed to confirm most federal judges and administration appointees. Four years later, Republicans ended the filibuster for Supreme Court nominations, clearing the way for Trump to install three conservative justices during his presidency.

That 6-3 conservative court has agreed to take up major cases this year on the hot-button issues of abortion and guns that could dramatically change American life.

Biden had previously opposed changing the filibuster rule but more recently has argued that voting rights reforms were urgently needed even if it meant weakening that procedure.

Top Senate Republican blasts Biden's 'rant' on voter rights, vows to oppose bill
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (5)
Benjamin USA
Benjamin USA Jan 12, 2022 9:39PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
If only it was about voter id, and not all sorts of cynnical opression from gerrymandering to closing polls to bussing workers to the wrong location then maybe the seditionist right would have a leg to stand on
John Nguyen
John Nguyen Jan 12, 2022 9:24PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
No ID alright, let go votes them out cause they're had been damaged the country enough:)
Bev Mcguffee
Bev Mcguffee Jan 12, 2022 8:48PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
No one who can not show proof of citizenship and/or ID should be allowed to vote on anything that pertains to law and tax abiding citizens.  Furthermore, a person should only be allowed to vote by mail if their medical health or age presents a problem.  All absentee voting should be cut-off at the same time and date in which in-person voting is stopped.  Doing otherwise, on any of the above, discredits the honor and privilege of legalized and qualified Americans’ voter rights.  Plus the probability of wrongdoing and voter fraud is just too obvious.  Everyone who chooses to vote should be held to the same acceptable and respectable standards.  Making excuses for anything less is a form of cheating to win!
Anthony Crowley
Anthony Crowley Jan 12, 2022 8:48PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Time for National ID card then?
Thomas Simpson
Thomas Simpson Jan 12, 2022 4:10PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Show up with a valid ID.
simone scelsa
simone scelsa Jan 12, 2022 2:33PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Is there a country in the world that allows to vote without an ID?
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email