Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Manchin, Sinema dash Biden hopes for filibuster change on abortion rights

Published 06/30/2022, 09:28 AM
Updated 07/01/2022, 03:01 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Joe Biden holds a news conference before departing the NATO summit at the IFEMA arena in Madrid, Spain, June 30, 2022. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

By Trevor Hunnicutt, Nandita Bose and Andrea Shalal

MADRID/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Joe Biden on Thursday proposed that U.S. senators remove a legislative roadblock to restoring abortion rights that were taken away by the Supreme Court last week, a suggestion that was shot down by aides to key Democratic lawmakers.

Biden's proposal to temporarily lift the Senate "filibuster" was rejected by aides to Democratic senators Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin.

Biden told a news conference at a NATO conference in Madrid that "we have to" pass laws making abortion a right in all 50 U.S. states.

"If the filibuster gets in the way - it's like voting rights - it should be we provide an exception for this," said Biden, a Democrat. Without sufficient votes in Congress to suspend the legislative filibuster, Biden's statement is more of a gesture than a policy plan.

A spokesman for Manchin and an aide to Sinema, who both have opposed suspending the filibuster in the past, told Reuters on Thursday that their respective positions had not changed.

Biden would very likely need their votes for Congress to sidestep the filibuster and pass a law to protect the federal right to abortion.

White House officials did not immediately offer any more details on what the president's strategy would be, or who in the administration would make it a reality.

Biden's new stance, coupled with the announcement of a White House meeting on Friday with state governors on abortion rights, came after sharp criticism from his own party over his response to the Supreme Court ruling overturning U.S. women's right to obtain abortions.

"There has been pressure building up to act and show that we are doing more," said an administration source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "The president has always believed something must be done."

The hot-button issue is seen as a potent political force ahead of the Nov. 8 midterm elections, where Democrats are seeking to retain control of the House of Representatives and Senate. Protecting abortion rights is a top issue for Democratic women, Reuters polling shows https://graphics.reuters.com/USA-ELECTION/POLLING/byprjqmdjpe/democrat.

In recent days, both White House aides and congressional leaders have said they lacked the 60 votes needed to end a filibuster to pass most legislation, including a broad abortion rights bill.

As recently as May, all 50 Republicans and Manchin voted against advancing legislation making abortion legal throughout the United States.

In January, a voting rights bill failed in the Senate eight days after Biden tried to propel it to passage by supporting a filibuster carve-out.

Biden had previously endorsed bypassing the filibuster in only limited cases, such as for voting rights and avoiding a debt default, but not for abortion rights.

On Thursday, he said the filibuster carve-out should apply not just to abortion but to other rights based on privacy, a likely reference to contraception and gay rights.

Biden has grown more open to bypassing the filibuster in recent months to protect fundamental rights, according to people familiar with the matter, but aides have debated the merits of making any statement on the issue until after the midterms, when Democrats could theoretically gain seats in the Senate.

The White House plans a range of executive actions in the coming days on abortion rights, and has also promised to protect women who cross state lines for abortions and support for medical abortion.

Media reports in recent days, including from Reuters, that the White House was unlikely to take up Democrats' bolder suggestions to protect abortion rights angered some in the president's own party.

Biden and administration officials have been concerned that more radical moves would be politically polarizing, undermine public trust in institutions like the Supreme Court or lack strong legal footing, sources inside and outside the White House said.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Joe Biden holds a news conference before departing the NATO summit at the IFEMA arena in Madrid, Spain, June 30, 2022. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

In a tweet on Wednesday, Democratic lawmaker Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez juxtaposed a Reuters report about Biden's unwillingness to take some steps on abortion with a New York Times report on Democrats' doubts on whether he will seek re-election in 2024, suggesting there was some connection.

"Now we're talking," Ocasio-Cortez said after Biden's remarks on the filibuster. "Time for people to see a real, forceful push for it. Use the bully pulpit. We need more."

Latest comments

you are not born till you are born. guys should carry babies so they would learn back alley abortions!
Stupid.. missed bio class where they teach life begins at conception.. straight D student?
  You missed the part where "born till you are born" has nothing to do w/ when life begins.
Liberals give more right and protection to flipping fish roe, than the do human roe and fetuses.
That's b.s.  It's a matter of weighting the rights/interest of the pregnant much higher than the retrumplicans do.
those that resort to attacks have already lost the argument..
  Those who don't communicate well enough to make the argument can't lose the argument that was never made.
Even IF congress were to pass a law codifying ******** that doesn't mean it wouldn't get stuck down by the SC.
Time to abolish an out of control Federal government and return the power to the individual states
The Republicans have already said they'll make abort ion ban nationwide.  Their agenda never included state power.
obviously you don’t understand.. that would only impact federal funding to PP. states have their last say. Proof: *******is federally illegal but states allow to a certain point each different
 You don't understand.  Republicans aim to change federal laws to override state laws that allow *****
AOC = counterproductive and wrong on every topic….
Men need to get on the side of womans rights. AOC is right on target. WOMANS RIGHTS.
.. and what about the child?? does that little girl or boy deserve a chane to breath/laugh/cry and have the same right to life you have??? the pro-womans rights movement has really taken on a narcissistic, self-centered position. sorry but *******is NOT Healthcare and the child's life is not disposable.
Republicans aren't going for a balance between women's & fetal rights.  They're going for all fetal/
REpublicans love to "vote for a corrupt rich old white male who has been" grifting for "over half a century and who now has dementia".
resorting to attacks prove you’ve lost the argument.. should read plato and learn how to create an argument.. biden or harris never released- that’s what the issue was.. they released wrong data and at that left it too much out.. as per the fbi
interested how you know if trump hasn’t released any info and his company is private
   "if trump hasn’t released any info" --  There's been subpoenas & gov't investigations and leaks.  Other people, like Michael Cohens, had released info..  How  clueless are you?
America, meet your new senators John Fetterman and Cheri Beasley
Hmm. Interesting comparison. I'll have to think about that.
That's brilliant, Fetterman just had a stroke and you think he should be a senator. l guess one more mentally compromised politician wouldn't hurt anything since they all are anyway. Living in Cambria County, PA I can give you an idea of the lawn signs in favor of him. 👎👎👎👎👎👎
A stroke is far from disqualifying. (See FDR). Cambria county is a nice place (I camped there once) but it is a Republican echo chamber in a state that went for Biden, so your anecdotal observations might not mean much.
"forced to get abortions" -- Sounds like something the Na zi and the CCP do.
  Sorry if you were being sarcastic.  Should make your sarcasm more obvious since there has been others saying similar bs here and they were serious.
Quite a stretch to say a misunderstanding over sarcasm prove a point of Carlos.
I feel sorry for Carlos. All that keyboard pounding only to have his comments deleted. Do you think they know he's in Russia?
Does anyone actually care what His Fraudulency thinks anymore?
You do.
it will be really funny when he does it and ends up with a republican senate next year
only cause democrats cheat on election laws… the way biden cheats his taxes
  Liar.  The vast majority of cases of election fraud in 2020 was committed by Republicans.
not according to actual proof.. but you wouldn’t understand that unless you looked at the people being convicted
lol I think he would have to filibuster it and uh they can't
You are confused.
Biden is in the Executive Branch, so your "he would have to filibuster it" makes no sense.  He CAN veto.  Confused, indeed.
nice save
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.