Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

As Taliban advances, China lays groundwork to accept an awkward reality

Published 08/14/2021, 12:41 AM
Updated 08/14/2021, 09:25 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Taliban delegates speak during talks between the Afghan government and Taliban insurgents in Doha, Qatar September 12, 2020. REUTERS/Ibraheem al Omari/File Photo

(Adds dropped letter in first paragraph of Saturday story)

By Yew Lun Tian

BEIJING (Reuters) - A series of photos published last month by Chinese state media of Foreign Minister Wang Yi standing shoulder to shoulder with visiting Taliban officials decked out in traditional tunic and turban raised eyebrows on the country's social media.

Since then, China's propaganda machinery has quietly begun preparing its people to accept an increasingly likely scenario that Beijing might have to recognize the Taliban, the hard line Islamist movement that is rapidly gaining territory in Afghanistan, as a legitimate regime.

"Even if they can't control the whole country, they would still be a significant force to reckon with", an influential social media commentator known to be familiar with China's foreign policy thinking wrote on Thursday. The commentator, who goes by the pen name Niutanqin, or "Zither-Playing Cow", made the remarks on his WeChat channel.

On Friday, the Global Times, a major state-backed tabloid, published an interview with the leader of an Afghan opposition party who said "the transitional government must include the Taliban".

The Taliban's momentum as U.S. forces withdraw is awkward for China, which has blamed religious extremism as a destabilizing force in its western Xinjiang region and has long worried that Taliban-controlled territory would be used to harbour separatist forces.

But China also hews to a policy of non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries.

It has also drastically tightened security in Xinjiang, hardening its borders and putting what UN experts and rights groups estimate were at least a million ethnic Uyghurs and other Muslims in detention centres that China describes as vocational training facilities to help stamp out Islamist extremism and separatism.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Last month's meeting in the northern Chinese city of Tianjin followed a similar visit by a Taliban delegation in 2019, but comes as the group is much more powerful, with Wang saying he hoped Afghanistan can have a "moderate Islamist policy".

"Isn't this the same Taliban that blew up the Buddhas of Bamiyan in front of world media? Shouldn't we have a bottom line?" a Chinese netizen commented on the Twitter-like Weibo (NASDAQ:WB) below a news clip showing Wang standing next to a Taliban official.

PRAGMATIC CHINA

In dealing with the Taliban, an increasingly powerful China may be able to leverage the fact that, unlike Russia or the United States, it has never fought them.

When the Taliban were last in power between 1996-2001, China had already suspended relations with Afghanistan, having pulled out its diplomats in 1993 following the outbreak of civil war.

"This is us being pragmatic. How you want to rule your country is largely your own business, just don't let that affect China," said Lin Minwang, a South Asia expert with Shanghai's Fudan University.

"When a major Asian power like China shows it recognizes Taliban's political legitimacy by meeting them so openly, it is giving the Taliban a big diplomatic win," Lin said.

State media published at least two analytical stories this week highlighting that Afghanistan had been the "graveyard of empires" and cautioning China not to be mired in the "Great Game", reinforcing a message that China harbours neither the intentions of sending troops into Afghanistan nor the illusion that it can fill the power vacuum left by the United States.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

After their meeting with Wang, the Taliban said they hope China can play a bigger economic role.

"This shows that China might have dangled promises of economic aid and investment to a post-war Afghanistan as a carrot to encourage both sides to stop fighting and reach a political settlement," said Zhang Li, a professor of South Asian studies at Sichuan University.

The risks to China of regional instability were highlighted last month when 13 people, including nine Chinese workers, were killed in Pakistan in a suicide bombing on a bus. China is building massive infrastructure projects in Pakistan under its Belt & Road initiative.

"China's number one priority is for the fighting to stop, as chaos breeds religious extremism and terrorism," Zhang said.

(Corrected to add dropped letter in first paragraph of Saturday story)

Latest comments

China also have an agreement w the Taliban for the 3b mining operation in 2016.
Ak47 is invented by a Russian but China is the world’s largest producer, Russia no longer makes the weapon
China has been selling ak47s to them. China is the only country benefit if Taliban win or loose.
US has been creating conflicts and propaganda in taiwan straits among the countries, taiwan and korea have spent BILLIONS buying weapons from US. US is the only country benefit regardless which country win or lose. What is Ak47 compare to the f15 US selling to these countries. Let me open up your clouded mind, if Afghanistan is a rich country, the world can rest assured US will definitely not pull out their troops, US will sell weapons making billions again for american companies! Got it????
US is the only propaganda machine in the world...
'.But China also hews to a policy of non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries..' -- What a joke. China meddles big time on a covert basis in the affairs of other countries. Building out infrastructure in Pakistan is just one way of such meddling. Give it 5 years and you will see it more clearly
No, I don't think so. Actually Europe is the one needs more the alliance with the US I think.
lets face it, EU is the biggest flop they have created. No meaningful contributions, just a bunch of politicans from the rich nations wanna exert control over the small nations to fulfill their agenda.
See the differences between China and US handling of things? China adopt respect and do not poke your nose into other people biz. US adopt to force their imperialism and ideas onto others by killings and war, using the names of democracy and human rights. When the americans kill, they term other side as genocides and themselves as liberators - the highest form of hypocrisy.
"... using the names of democracy and human rights." Well, you're right about that.  The Chinese would never use that phrase: people would laugh in their faces !
of course China wont use these terms, they are just for superficial actors. China do what is generally good for the country/society as a whole, be it even if its hard-handed. Not like the americans, biggest racists towards other colours for hundreds of years be it in america or abroad, yet skin n skull are so thick going around preaching human rights/democracy/equal opportunities. Look at US politicians, biggest white supremacists in disguise, bunch of fakers.
Pretty hot topic, i hope that it all works out for the citizens of Afganistan.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.