Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Texas law sparks hundreds of U.S. protests against abortion restrictions

Published 10/02/2021, 06:12 AM
Updated 10/02/2021, 08:22 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A demonstrator holds a pro-abortion rights sign as she listens to speakers at a Black Women Take Action event outside the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S. September 15, 2021.  REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo

By Timothy Gardner and Richard Webner

WASHINGTON/AUSTIN, Texas (Reuters) -Women marched by the thousands on Saturday on the Supreme Court, the Texas Capitol and cities across the United States to protest increasing state restrictions on abortion and advocate for maintaining a constitutional right to the procedure.

The 660 demonstrations around the United States were largely sparked by a Texas law that bans abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy. The measure, which went into effect last month, is the most restrictive in the country.

“No matter where you live, no matter where you are, this moment is dark,” Alexis McGill Johnson, president of Planned Parenthood, told the crowd at the “Rally for Abortion Justice” in Washington.

In the Texas capital of Austin, hundreds gathered in sweltering heat to denounce the so-called "heartbeat" law signed by Governor Greg Abbott. It bans abortion after cardiac activity is detected in the embryo, usually around six weeks. That is before most women know they are pregnant and earlier than 85% to 90% of all abortions are carried out, experts say.

The law relies on ordinary citizens to enforce the ban, which makes no exceptions for rape or incest, rewarding them at least $10,000 if they successfully sue anyone who helped provide an illegal abortion.

Some of the demonstrators said the law would backfire on legislators. "I think more people believe in the issue of providing safe abortions than our legislature realizes," said Andrea Roberts, 49, an Austin preschool director.

"Abort Abbott" appeared on several of the demonstrators' signs and T-shirts, while others sported the Texas state slogan, "Come and Take It" next to a drawing of a uterus.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Washington protesters marched to the U.S. Supreme Court two days before the court reconvenes for a session in which the justices will consider a Mississippi case that could enable them to overturn abortion rights established in the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade case.

If the court overturns the precedent, abortion access would no longer by protected by the Constitution, leaving states free to ban it, limit it or allow it without restrictions.

The justices, in a 5-4 decision on Sept. 1, already denied a request from abortion and women's health providers to block enforcement of the Texas law.

"It's cruel and it's sure as hell not Christian," Kenya Martin, of the nonprofit Abortion Care Network told several thousand Washington protesters.

Under sunny skies, the demonstrators carried signs that said, "Bans off my body," "Think outside my box" and "Keep your rosaries off my ovaries."

"We're heading in the wrong direction," said Katy Allen, a 67-year-old university researcher from Rochester, New York. "It's the tyranny of the minority."

About two dozen counter-protesters also showed up to press their case in support of anti-abortion laws.

"We want to call on everyone to respect life," said Albert Stecklein, a 56-year-old business administrator from Rockville, Maryland. "The child in the womb is no less deserving of respect and dignity than you or me."

Rachel O'Leary Carmona, executive director of Women's March, said the number of marches would be second only to the group's first protest, which mobilized millions of people around the world to rally against former President Donald Trump the day after his inauguration in 2017.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

A rally and march in New York drew thousands of protesters, including actresses Amy Schumer and Jennifer Lawrence.

Abortion rights advocates and the U.S. Justice Department have challenged the Texas law in state and federal courts, arguing that it violates Roe v. Wade.

A federal judge in Austin on Friday heard the Justice Department's request to block the law temporarily while its constitutionality is challenged.

Latest comments

rrrright.. their body their choice.. eeeexcept when it come to things they care about... theeeen its your body dems choice.. the hypocrisy just never ends..
Anyone for ***should watch any ultrasound video of an ***and see if you change your mind. If you arent moved by that then so be it.
I find it curious why dems are so passionate about aborting baby humans. They are brilliant at messaging that you are weird for not wanting to do so.
James Edwards pushing more misinformation and far right propaganda.
They were told million times.  It is not your body, it is babies bodies, another person.
that's right Vlad, the State must have total control over it's citizens bodies, whether they are ordered to take the vaccines give blood, used to test new drugs or bring pregnancy to term. they must comply....or else.
 There is no need to comply with anything here. DO not *******the baby.  That is all
There is one grate evil in live. And that’s people trying to force their point of view on others. The USA says it’s a democracy. But with this king of laws, it’s more like the taliban
Authoritarian republicans creating more beurocracy and regulations, how classic.
It is the opposite. Trashy democrats are known to create beurocracy around abortions. That is why they are fighting.
James Edwards, this is not about the 2 or third trimester this about doctor patient privacy and the the intrusive nature of a law that uses 6 weeks as a benchmark to take control of womens body by the State.
Murder is ******** no matter how you call it.
Of course! That's why you need the handgun restrictions loosened too.
Mandate me and you get no choice. Cant have your cake and eat it too
not following a mandate Will not put you in jail or get you sued these new antichoice laws coming out of these red states will.
Democrats “My Body My Choice” slogan does not apply to vaccines which is also medical procedure Nuremberg trials established right over ones body takes precedent over the collective. The Democratic party will only stand up for you to peddle their political agendas they do not care about freedom
Unironically mentioning nuremberg trials is a real alpha brain move
Unironically mentioning nuremberg trials is a real alpha brain move
“My body my Choice” but only on ********with vaccine “my body Biden choice”. The hypocrisy of leftists in USA has no limits.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.