Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

U.S. Supreme Court seeks Trump administration views on Google-Oracle copyright feud

Published 04/29/2019, 10:04 AM
Updated 04/29/2019, 10:04 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: An illuminated Google logo is seen inside an office building in Zurich

By Andrew Chung

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday asked the Trump administration to offer its views on whether it should hear Google's bid to end Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) Corp's copyright infringement lawsuit involving the Android operating system that runs most of the world's smartphones.

The justices are considering whether to take up Google's appeal of a lower court ruling reviving the lawsuit. Oracle has sought about $9 billion in damages.

A jury cleared Google in 2016, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, which specializes in intellectual property disputes, overturned that decision in 2018, finding Google impermissibly used Oracle's software code in Android under U.S. copyright law.

The case, which could help define the level of copyright protection for software, dates back to 2010 when Oracle sued in San Francisco federal court, accusing Google of harming its business by copying thousands of lines of computer code from its popular Java programming language without a license in order to make Android. Google, part of Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) Inc, said an Oracle victory would chill software innovation.

The case has whipsawed since the start with Google twice losing at the Federal Circuit. In 2014, that court reversed a federal judge's ruling that Oracle's interfaces could not be copyrighted.

The Federal Circuit last year rejected Google's argument that its use of Oracle's "application programming interfaces" was permitted under the so-called fair use doctrine of the 1976 Copyright Act because by adapting them to a mobile platform it transformed them into something new.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The Supreme Court occasionally asks a president's administration for advice on whether to take up a particular case. The court in 2015 rebuffed a previous Google appeal in the case after the Justice Department under President Barack Obama recommended against hearing it.

The justices did not give President Donald Trump's Justice Department a deadline for its response in the case.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.