Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

California to enforce net neutrality after judge rejects challenge by internet providers

Published 02/23/2021, 07:12 PM
Updated 02/24/2021, 05:45 AM
© Reuters. A supporter of Net Neutrality protests the FCC's recent decision to repeal the program in Los Angeles

By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - California should soon implement its landmark net neutrality law under a judge's ruling on Tuesday, nearly three years after the state legislature enacted the measure, the state attorney general's office said.

U.S. Judge John Mendez for the Eastern District of California said in an oral ruling he would not block the law from taking effect as four telecom and broadband industry groups sought, his office confirmed. California's 2018 law barred internet service providers from blocking or throttling traffic, or offering paid fast lanes.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra applauded the decision. "The ability of an internet service provider to block, slow down or speed up content based on a user’s ability to pay for service degrades the very idea of a competitive marketplace and the open transfer of information at the core of our increasingly digital and connected world," he said.

The four industry groups that sued said in a joint statement they would decide on next steps. "A state-by-state approach to Internet regulation will confuse consumers and deter network investment, just as the importance of broadband for all has never been more apparent," the groups said.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) under former President Barack Obama, a Democrat, adopted net neutrality rules in 2015. These were overturned in 2017 by the FCC under President Donald Trump, a Republican. California's legislature responded by adopting a state law requiring net neutrality in August 2018.

Earlier this month, the U.S. Justice Department withdrew its Trump-era legal challenge to the California law after President Joe Biden, a Democrat, took office.

Supporters of net neutrality argue that the protections ensure a free and open internet. Broadband and telecoms trade groups contend their legal basis from the pre-internet era was outdated and that they would discourage investment.

© Reuters. A supporter of Net Neutrality protests the FCC's recent decision to repeal the program in Los Angeles

California had agreed not to enforce the law while legal proceedings were ongoing.

Latest comments

One step forward to socialism
Stop crying about 'socialism' because you see 'California' in the article. You're not even American..... This is about the freedom of the internet, where service providers cannot make it so, for example, YouTube videos load @ 100Mb / sec. but vids hosted on Facebook only load at 5Mb / second. This is a simple explanation to help you get the idea - because it's clear, with your immediate reaction to seeing 'California' and crying about socialism, that you don't even know you're whining in favor of these corporations screwing over all of their users so they can control how you use the internet or make it cost way more.  This is a possible real example - Verizon owns major media networks and is also an internet provider. Same with Comcast. They could make it so their own websites - plus other websites that pay them a fee - get good connection speeds while the rest of the internet is slow.  All of this is all because the internet isn't a utility, yet, like it should be.
Socialism does not mean bad.... explained to us if you know what Socialism means...
Meaning slow internet and cost more for all. Internet is like electricity, if ur neighbor is watching to much cat movies, he should pay more. Why all have to pay more? This is another ‘Obama care’. All must pay more for a few.
You're not even American so why are you talking like this?  You don't even have a ****clue what net neutrality is...but you see 'California' and just start doing your best Trump impression, where you make a bunch of random, totally false claims that are not remotely tied to net neutrality HERE IS WHAT NET NEUTRALITY IS & WHAT THIS COURT WIN DID: "Network neutrality, most commonly called net neutrality, is the principle that Internet service providers (ISPs) must treat all Internet communications equally, and not discriminate or charge differently based on user, content, website, platform, application, type of equipment, source address, destination address, or method of communication.[4][5] With net neutrality, ISPs may not intentionally block, slow down, or charge money for specific online content. Without net neutrality, ISPs may prioritize certain types of traffic, meter others, or potentially block traffic from specific services, while charging consumers for various tiers of service"
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.