Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

In win for Uber, Lyft, judge strikes down New York City's cruising cap

Published 12/23/2019, 07:44 PM
Updated 12/23/2019, 07:44 PM
© Reuters. Uber's logo is pictured at its office in Bogota

© Reuters. Uber's logo is pictured at its office in Bogota

By Tina Bellon

(Reuters) - A New York state judge on Monday ruled in favor of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) Inc and Lyft Inc (NASDAQ:LYFT) in a lawsuit against New York City, striking down a new rule limiting how much time drivers for ride-hailing services can spend cruising streets in busy areas of Manhattan without passengers.

Judge Lyle Frank of the Supreme Court of State of New York in his decision called the city's cruising cap "arbitrary and capricious."

New York City passed the rule in August with the aim of reducing traffic congestion in Manhattan, where ride-share vehicles make up close to a third of peak traffic.

The city's mayor's office said it was reviewing its legal options, including an appeal.

"We put these rules in place to protect hardworking drivers and New Yorkers—and we’ll fight to keep them," said a spokeswoman for the mayor.

Monday's decision marks a win for Uber and Lyft in their largest U.S. market, where regulators have passed the toughest ride-hailing rules of the country and forced both companies to adjust their business models.

The ruling does not affect New York City's other laws regarding ride-hailing, including a cap on the number of app-based, for-hire cars and minimum pay for the city's 80,000 ride-share drivers.

Uber, which filed the lawsuit in September, welcomed the decision.

"Uber remains committed to fighting for driver flexibility in the face of politically motivated regulations and to stand up for policies that actually combat congestion," the company said in a statement.

Lyft, which filed a separate lawsuit that Frank said was also covered by his Monday decision, said the ruling reaffirmed the regulator created bad policy.

"We look forward to working with state and city leaders to address New York City’s transportation challenges with the only true solution to congestion: comprehensive congestion pricing," Lyft said in a statement.

To prepare for the laws, both Uber and Lyft over the past months locked out drivers from their apps at times and in areas of low demand.

The cruising cap, intended to come into effect in February 2020, set a limit on how much time drivers of app-based vehicles may drive or wait without passengers in Manhattan south of 96th Street. New York's cruising rate was 41% in 2018. Under the new rule, the maximum would have fallen to 36% in February 2020 and 31% six months later.

© Reuters. Uber's logo is pictured at its office in Bogota

Frank on Monday said the cruising rate should not include time a driver spends traveling to pick up passengers who requested a ride.

Latest comments

all laws r just one goal:They force uber,lyft to charge the same rate like taxis.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.