Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
🙌 It's Here: the Only Stock Screener You'll Ever Need Get Started

Biden to require chips companies winning subsidies to share excess profits

Published Feb 28, 2023 05:04AM ET Updated Mar 01, 2023 07:37AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Semiconductor chips are seen on a printed circuit board in this illustration picture taken February 17, 2023. REUTERS/Florence Lo/Illustration
 
INTC
-1.51%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Biden administration on Tuesday said it will require companies winning funds from its $52-billion U.S. semiconductor manufacturing and research program to share excess profits and explain how they plan to provide affordable childcare.

The Commerce Department on Tuesday released its plans to begin accepting applications in late June for a $39-billion manufacturing subsidy program. The law also creates a 25% investment tax credit for building chip plants, estimated to be worth $24 billion.

The CHIPS Act plays a central role in the Biden administration's effort to bring semiconductor manufacturing back to the United States. Its success is vital to U.S. ambitions to keep ahead of China in global markets.

Semiconductor companies have already announced more than 40 new projects including nearly $200 billion in private investments to increase domestic production.

    Recipients who receive more than $150 million in direct funding "will be required to share with the U.S. government a portion of any cash flows or returns that exceed the applicant’s projections by an agreed-upon threshold," the department said.

Commerce expects "upside sharing will only be material in instances where the project significantly exceeds its projected cash flows or returns, and will not exceed 75% of the recipient’s direct funding award."

'NOT A FREE HANDOUT'

Democratic Senator Jack Reed praised the profit sharing plan, saying chips funding is "not a free handout for multi-billion dollar tech companies.... There is no downside for companies that participate because they only have to share a portion of future profits if they do exceedingly well."

Republican House Science Committee Chair Frank Lucas criticized the childcare and revenue-sharing provisions, saying they exceed authority granted by Congress. He says Commerce is "focusing less on the urgent need for chip production and more on attempting to impose their labor agenda on this critical industry."

Companies winning funding are also prohibited from using chips funds for dividends or stock buybacks, and must provide details of any plans to buy back their own shares over five years. The department will consider an "applicant’s commitments to refrain from stock buybacks."

Democratic lawmakers have noted that the largest U.S. semiconductor companies have poured hundreds of billions of dollars into stock buybacks in recent years, with Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) spending more than $100 billion on buybacks since 2005. Intel also pays a dividend.

It's not uncommon for states to require specific employment targets as a condition for tax subsidies, but the Biden administration is a significant expansion.

Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said companies must submit a plan that includes an outline of workforce needs. Applicants seeking more than $150 million in direct funding must submit "a plan for how they will provide affordable and accessible childcare for their workers."

PUBLIC INCENTIVES

White House economic adviser Heather Boushey said the announcement "is emblematic of using public incentives to simultaneously deliver on building strategic supply chains for our economic and national security while also investing in our care infrastructure."

The Biden administration laid out ambitious plans to pay millions of caretakers, mostly women, better salaries, and make child and elder care cheaper in 2021 but it failed to win majority support in Congress.

Applicants must address six program priority areas including plans "to commit to future investment in the U.S. semiconductor industry, including to build R&D facilities in the United States."

Applicants should also "create opportunities for minority owned, veteran-owned, and women-owned businesses; demonstrate climate and environmental responsibility; invest in their communities by addressing barriers to economic inclusion; and commit to using iron, steel, and construction materials produced in the United States."

The Semiconductor Industry Association said it was carefully reviewing the funding notice that "lays out the rules of the road for companies to apply for the CHIPS Act’s manufacturing grants."

Most direct funding awards are expected to range between 5% and 15% of project capital expenditures. Commerce said it generally expects the total amount of an award including loan or loan guarantee, to not exceed 35% of project capital expenditures.

"We're going to be doing our own diligence. We're not writing blank checks to any company that asks," Raimondo said. "We're making companies open their books."

The initial funding opportunity seeks applications for projects involving leading-edge, current-generation, and mature-node semiconductors. It will release funding opportunities for semiconductor materials and manufacturing equipment facilities in late spring and one for R&D facilities in the fall.

Raimondo noted that companies winning awards will be required to enter into agreements restricting their ability to expand semiconductor manufacturing capacity in foreign countries of concern like China for 10 years after winning funding. They cannot engage in any joint research or licensing efforts with a foreign entity of concern involving sensitive technologies.

"We're going to be releasing very detailed regulations in the next few weeks that give companies a clearer sense of what the red lines are," Raimondo said.

Biden to require chips companies winning subsidies to share excess profits
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (3)
Ed Glass
EddieG Feb 28, 2023 2:04PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
corporate welfare. us government should mandate if any company receiving government hand outs, then a company needs to be headquartered in the USA and paying proper taxes.
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Feb 28, 2023 2:04PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Tax paying, yes; but headquartered too? Toyota shouldn't get subsidies for building battery manufacturing plant in US? It's a lot of good jobs.
Eric Poff
Eric Poff Feb 28, 2023 1:58PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
they already do this..it's called Dividends
Flat Top
Flat Top Feb 28, 2023 1:58PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Dividends are taxes?
jason xx
jason xx Feb 28, 2023 6:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I don't know why they are so against stock buy backs. They help everyone's retirement accounts
Connecticut Yankee
A_Jaundiced_Eye Feb 28, 2023 6:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Dems are against them - not just buybacks, RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS. They want everyone to be dependent on Social Security; that's the easiest way to buy votes. "Vote for me and I'll raise your Social Security!"
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Feb 28, 2023 6:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Connecticut Yankee Yeah, but not really.
Ed Glass
EddieG Feb 28, 2023 6:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
yeah, they are getting government hand out.
Teena Marie
Teena Marie Feb 28, 2023 6:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Decades of subsidies, declining corporate taxes, and minimum wage labor support all major industries and by extension, tax exempt buybacks that contribute to stock market returns. It's a top down approach that enhances standard of living and retirement for 40% of workers and retirees and phenomenal returns for the 10% that owns 90% of our nation's wealth. The remaining 60% are largely blamed for falling behind. A more equitable approach is not unreasonable when rewarding returns beyond a set amount are the result of government investment for growth and innovation.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email