Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

U.S. judge will not block Amazon-Berkshire-JPMorgan health venture's new hire

Published 02/22/2019, 11:51 AM
Updated 02/22/2019, 11:55 AM
© Reuters. Traders work at the post where UnitedHealth Group is traded on the floor of the NYSE in New York

By Nate Raymond

BOSTON (Reuters) - A federal judge on Friday declined to block a UnitedHealth Group Inc (NYSE:UNH) unit's former executive from working at a new healthcare venture launched by Amazon.com Inc (NASDAQ:AMZN), Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRKa) Inc and JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE:JPM).

The decision by U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf in Boston came in a lawsuit closely watched in the industry for clues about the future plans of the venture, which was announced in January 2018 with a goal of lowering healthcare costs.

UnitedHealth's Optum unit had sought a court order blocking David Smith from working at the venture, saying he could share trade secrets that would give it a competitive advantage.

But Wolf declined to issue a temporary restraining order preventing Smith from working there pending the outcome of an arbitration, saying Optum had not established Smith was likely violating an agreement to not work for a competitor.

He said the unnamed Boston-based venture, nicknamed "ABC," does not offer products that compete with Optum, and said while it might do so someday, the startup could become a potential Optum customer instead of its rival.

"Any prediction about the future now would be speculative," he said.

Wolf said Optum had also failed to show Smith has disclosed any of its confidential information since joining ABC, an allegation Smith denied.

Optum, which provides pharmacy benefit management and other services, said in a statement it would "aggressively" pursue its claims against Smith in arbitration.

Smith's lawyer and ABC declined to comment.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

In January, Optum sued Smith, its former vice president of product and corporate strategy, alleging he violated an agreement to not work at a competitor for a year in exchange for stock and options.

Optum claimed Smith, now a director of strategy and research at ABC, misappropriated trade secrets that would give the venture an unfair advantage.

Testifying in court last month, Smith argued ABC was not a competitor but is focused on serving its three founding companies' 1.2 million employees.

Jack Stoddard, ABC's chief operating officer, testified that ABC is examining whether it can "reinvent what insurance looks like in terms of benefit design."

Stoddard said ABC had not ruled out developing products. But he said its "preferred path" was to partner with companies like Optum to provide services and had no plans to directly compete with Optum in 2019.

The case is Optum Inc v. Smith, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, No. 19-cv-10101.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.