Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

U.S. drillers, miners would be out billions if paid climate, health costs: study

Published 03/22/2021, 03:52 PM
Updated 03/22/2021, 04:00 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: In U.S. coal country, workers forgive Trump for failed revival

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. coal, natural gas and motor fuel producers get implicit benefits worth tens of billion of dollars a year by not having to pay for the damage their products do to the climate and human health, a study said on Monday.

As the world begins to transition to technologies that emit less pollution to generate electricity and fuel vehicles, economists are attempting to estimate the cost to society of burning fossil fuels.

In a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Yale University economist Matthew Kotchen calculated that U.S. fossil fuel companies get direct benefits of $62 billion a year in implicit subsidies due to what he calls "inefficient pricing".

The overall health, climate and transportation costs to society are about $568 billion, the study, titled "The producer benefits of implicit fossil fuel subsidies in the United States", said.

Peabody Energy Corp got about $1.56 billion in implicit subsidies in 2018, while Arch Resources got a little over $1 billion in the same year, the study said.

Natural gas producer EQT Corp (NYSE:EQT) got about $696 million while Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) got about $688 million, it added.

None of the companies immediately commented when asked about the estimates.

The study, the first to estimate the benefits on a company specific basis, estimated coal companies would pay the most if policies were changed to account for the costs.

Kotchen launched the research as policymakers were considering new subsidies for fossil fuel companies to help them recover from anemic demand due to the coronavirus pandemic.

President Joe Biden wants to end fossil fuel subsidies, but that could be difficult given the Democrats have the slimmest majority possible in the Senate, and some Democrats come from states that produce fossil fuels.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A drilling rig operates in the Permian Basin oil and natural gas producing area in Lea County

Still, the study could help spur policy to address the issues, said Gilbert Metcalf, an economist at Tufts University. "A better understanding of the transfers involved ... should be extremely helpful for policy makers hoping to eliminate these wasteful subsidies."

Latest comments

Electric cars were quashed by big oil in the early 1900's and again in 1980's & 90's to keep oil executives rich and the rest of us paying for health and environmental costs. Isn't 100 years of subsidies proof enough it's time to change. Car companies colluded with big oil to keep mpg low and make billions too. Welcome electric vehicles and flurry of innovative small companies to ********this greedy behemoth
uhhh... how many people would die without fossil fuel power for heating and cooling... we are trying to sustain 8 billion people who don't all live in perfectly hospitable climates.
What about the cimpanies that produce internal combustion engines? They are given a free ride in rhis debate
absolute nonsense
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.