Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

U.S. court revives Mattress Firm defamation case against Sleep Number

Published 11/27/2018, 12:48 PM
Updated 11/27/2018, 12:50 PM
© Reuters. A Mattress Firm store is shown in Encinitas, California

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Tuesday revived for a second time a 11-year-old defamation lawsuit by bedding retailer Mattress Firm Inc against adjustable bed maker Sleep Number Corp (O:SNBR).

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said a lower court judge misinterpreted New York law in dismissing claims first brought in March 2007 by Sleepy's, now part of Mattress Firm, against Select Comfort, renamed Sleep Number last November.

Andrew Hansen, a lawyer for Sleep Number, declined to comment. Lawyers for Mattress Firm did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Mattress Firm, part of South Africa's Steinhoff International Holdings NV (J:SNHJ), emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection last week.

The case concerned whether Select Comfort violated a 2005 contract that let Sleepy's sell Select Comfort's wood framed "Personal Preference" beds, while Select Comfort sold its plastic-and-polymer framed "Core" beds in its own stores.

Sleepy's sued after "secret" shoppers it hired to visit Select Comfort stores reported that salespeople disparaged the quality and comfort of Personal Preference beds, whose sales were poor, and said Sleepy's offered inferior warranties.

U.S. District Judge Joanna Seybert in Central Islip, New York dismissed the case in Sept. 2015, saying the alleged disparagements were not "published to a third party" under New York law because only Sleepy's secret shoppers heard them.

But in a 3-0 decision by the New York-based appeals court, Circuit Judge Robert Sack said the publication requirement might have been met if the shoppers qualified as Sleepy's "agents."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

He ordered Seybert to revisit that issue, and whether Sleepy's consented to the alleged slanders.

The appeals court also threw out a $2.63 million legal fee award for Sleepy's, saying Seybert didn't justify it and should reconsider the amount.

Sleep Number is based in Minneapolis. Sleepy's was based in Hicksville, New York, and Mattress Firm is based in Houston.

Sleepy's lawsuit had been dismissed by a different judge in Sept. 2012, and revived by the appeals court in March 2015.

The case is Sleepy's LLC v. Select Comfort Wholesale Corp et al, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Nos. 15-3560, 16-3595.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.