🧐 ProPicks AI October update is out now! See which stocks made the listPick Stocks with AI

US anti-trust trial in Tapestry bid for Capri ends, judge's decision awaited

Published 09/30/2024, 08:00 PM
Updated 09/30/2024, 08:16 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A signage is seen in the offices of Tapestry, Inc., in Manhattan, New York, U.S., November 19, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo
TPR
-
CPRI
-

By Siddharth Cavale

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. anti-trust trial over the $8.5 billion bid by luxury goods maker Tapestry (NYSE:TPR) to buy Capri concluded on Monday, with Tapestry lawyers citing an "intensely competitive" handbag market in defending against claims that consumers would face higher prices.

At the New York trial, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission sought to prove in its closing arguments that the deal to bring six brands - Tapestry's Coach , Kate Spade, and Stuart Weitzman with Capri's Versace, Jimmy Choo, and Michael Kors - into a single company would leave shoppers with fewer, more expensive handbags than if the companies were separate.

FTC counsel Abby Dennis tried to draw parallels between the multiple transportation methods to get to Washington D.C. from New York - such as buses, trains, planes and even helicopters - but how difficult it is for consumers to interchange between those options because of price limitations. She said Americans face the same challenges with handbags.

A U.S. federal judge will decide whether to block the merger that was announced in August 2023, or allow it to proceed. A decision could be expected anywhere between three weeks to three months, according to Tapestry.

"The judge... has an avalanche of material thrown at her and needs some time to think through it. You cannot say this one is in the bag for either of the parties," said James Weingarten (NYSE:WRI), a former FTC chief trial counsel, who now works in Washington D.C. at law firm Milbank.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A signage is seen in the offices of Tapestry, Inc., in Manhattan, New York, U.S., November 19, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo

Over seven days of evidentiary proceedings, lawyers for both sides spent considerable time focused on defining the so-called "accessible luxury" marketplace. While the FTC relied on an expert witness, economist Loren Smith, to evaluate the market, lawyers for Tapestry poked holes in the financial modeling and methodology used to define the market. Tapestry's lead counsel Lawrence Buterman on Monday requested the judge completely disregard the analysis.

"The FTC can't meet their burden under any standard," Buterman said in closing, asking the judge to allow the merger to proceed.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.