Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Trump declines to set U.S. uranium production quotas

Published 07/13/2019, 04:17 PM
Updated 07/13/2019, 04:17 PM
© Reuters.  Trump declines to set U.S. uranium production quotas

By Valerie Volcovici and Timothy Gardner

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump declined to issue quotas for domestic uranium production late on Friday and instead ordered a 90-day governmental review, a decision praised by U.S. nuclear power generators who fear curbs on fuel imports would boost costs.

Trump said in a memorandum he did not concur with a U.S. Commerce Department investigation that found uranium imports threaten to impair U.S. national security.

While Trump said the department's findings "raise significant concerns", he ordered a deeper review by the U.S. Nuclear Fuel Working Group, with input from several government agencies. "A fuller analysis of national security considerations with respect to the entire nuclear fuel supply chain is necessary," the memorandum said.

The group will make "recommendations to further enable domestic nuclear fuel production if needed," it said.

The U.S. nuclear power industry faces a rash of closures amid rising security costs and competition from plants that run on cheap natural gas.

Political factors likely weighed in Friday's decision, which analysts at ClearView Energy Partners said "may be a harbinger of future White House willingness to intervene into other ...relevant energy policy issues" in critical swing states ahead of the 2020 election.

Pennsylvania, the fifth most populous U.S. state, has five nuclear power plants, for example.

DECISION PRAISED BY NUCLEAR POWER COMPANIES

The United States sourced just 7% of its uranium domestically in 2017, with most of the rest coming from Canada, Australia and Russia, according to the Energy Information Administration.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

U.S. uranium mining firms, as well as more than two dozen western state lawmakers, have argued that nuclear generators rely heavily on adversaries such as Russia, China and Kazakhstan for uranium supply from their state-owned companies, who flood the market.

Petitions from Colorado-based Energy Fuels Inc (A:UUUU) and Wyoming-based Ur-Energy Inc (A:URG) seek quotas requiring 25% of the U.S. uranium market be sourced domestically.

Last year, the Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service approved the expansion of Energy Fuels’ La Sal and Daneros mines, the latter of which is located just outside the Bears Ears National Monument in Utah.

Electric utility companies with nuclear power plants, including Duke Energy (N:DUK) and Entergy (N:ETR), fought hard against the miners' petitions, arguing that their costs would spike if they were forced to source uranium domestically.

A group of nuclear power generators, called the Ad Hoc Utilities Group, said it was pleased with Trump's decision. "It is clear the Trump administration recognizes the enormous economic and resiliency benefits that the U.S. nuclear energy industry provides to Americans," the group said in a release.

Latest comments

Not to worry for this companies. In a few years they can buy all the extra from Iran at deep discount.
A global coalition will take out Iran’s nuke dreams long before that could happen. Iran will not be allowed to join that club. Period.
Iran does not need to make a nuke. all they are telling you is they will make tones of plutonium and let other do the nuke. You think to hard when it is easy to figure out..
A coalition led by who? The US? This president is ostracizing our allies and embracing our enemies. The closer they get, the more he will give them a foot rub like he does NK and Russia.
So let me get this straight: A Toyota Camry is a "threat to national security," but the stuff used to make nuclear fuel isn't. What a brilliant mind.
Still not straight.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.