Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
⏰ React to the Market Faster with Custom, Real-Time News Get Started

Top US Senate Democrat Schumer wants legislative response to banking ills

Stock Markets Mar 15, 2023 04:25PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) arrives to a news conference to discuss President Biden’s budget on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., March 9, 2023. REUTERS/Mary F. Calvert

By Moira Warburton

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Congress needs to act on bipartisan legislation strengthening banking industry controls, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said on Wednesday, amid global worries over the financial soundness of Credit Suisse and the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank.

"We need strong legislation and hopefully we can put something together that's bipartisan," Schumer told reporters following a closed policy lunch with his fellow Democrats.

Schumer's comments came in response to a question about whether he would support legislation spearheaded by Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, which would reinstate banking regulations and oversight rolled back under former President Donald Trump.

He declined to say whether he would support Warren's bill.

Calls for increased oversight of the U.S. banking industry grew as fallout from Friday's collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) widened.

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sherrod Brown, however, downplayed the likelihood of Congress passing a "significant" banking bill anytime soon. "There are people who will introduce bills, but I cannot imagine -- with the hold that the banks have on Republicans in Congress -- that we could pass anything significant," Brown, a Democrat, told reporters.

Republicans hold a narrow majority in the House of Representatives and Democrats do not control enough votes in the Senate to advance legislation without Republican cooperation.

Brown said his committee would hold oversight hearings. "We'll bring in the regulators, for sure," he said.

Senators are largely unified on demanding answers from regulators about the SVB collapse.

"Most of our members want to have the question answered by the regulators, what happened? How come they were asleep at the switch and didn't see this coming?" Senator John Thune, the chamber's No. 2 Republican, told reporters.

He disagreed with Schumer on whether more legislation was necessary.

"I think it would be premature to start talking about solutions before we fully define the problem," he said.

Compounding fears of contagion from SVB's collapse is Credit Suisse, one of 30 global financial institutions considered systematically important by the international Financial Stability Board.

On Wednesday stock prices of the Swiss bank plunged after its largest shareholder, the Saudi National Bank, said it could not provide further financial support.

The news re-ignited jitters among investors about the resilience of the global banking system.

"Everybody is concerned" about the impact of Credit Suisse on the U.S. bank system, Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, said on Wednesday.

"I don't see this being widespread but it's very, very important to stay on top of it and the administration is," Democratic Senator Debbie Stabenow, a senior member of the Senate Finance Committee, told Reuters. "Nobody takes this lightly and they're monitoring all of this very closely."

Top US Senate Democrat Schumer wants legislative response to banking ills
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (8)
Gary Piccone
Gary Piccone Mar 15, 2023 7:04PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Here we go again, a reactionary country, atta boy Chuck
Stephen Fa
Stephen Fa Mar 15, 2023 5:59PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
How about reducing government spending?
Phil Ht
Phil Ht Mar 15, 2023 4:34PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
They are already nationalizing the banks. They will move into digital currencies more. Very supppressive
William Bailey
William Bailey Mar 15, 2023 4:05PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Republicans break it all for a few bucks and tefuse to fix what they break
Ac Tektrader
Ac Tektrader Mar 15, 2023 3:44PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Roger...America has been there, done that.... your financial ideas almost destroyed the American economy in 1907....that is why the Federal Reserve was created.... deregulating the banks has been a problem since the deregulation frenzy of the Reagan Administration.
Roger Miller
Roger Miller Mar 15, 2023 3:24PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Regulation has been increasing for decades.  It does not solve the problem of a banking system run by inept politicians and bureaucrats, more regulations have only made it worse.  Time for less government, no central bank, and a free market in banking where customers decide fore themselves and not rely on failed government to protect them.
Maximus Maximus
Maximus Maximus Mar 15, 2023 3:24PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
wrong, wrong and wrong again..
Stephen Fa
Stephen Fa Mar 15, 2023 3:24PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
clueless, clueless, and clueless again Max
Hank Williams
Hank Williams Mar 15, 2023 3:11PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Stick your head back in the sand. You forget you are developing a track record with big business and its not good.
Chad Richer Than You
Chad Richer Than You Mar 15, 2023 3:10PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Pull all your cash out of the banks as soon as possible
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email