Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

State Street calls for women on corporate boards worldwide

Stock MarketsJan 12, 2022 05:06PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The Fearless Girl statue is seen while heavy rain falls as a severe weather system passes through the area in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., April 21, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo

By Ross Kerber

BOSTON (Reuters) -Asset manager State Street Corp (NYSE:STT) will expect all portfolio companies worldwide to have at least one woman on their boards, executives said, expanding a policy previously focused on developed markets.

In a letter to directors released on Wednesday, Cyrus Taraporevala, CEO of State Street Global Advisors, said the new policy effective this year builds on previous actions to push boardroom diversity. These include its backing for the well-known "Fearless Girl" statue in Manhattan, installed 2017 ahead of International Women's Day.

Ben Colton, a stewardship leader for the division, said while many companies claim they cannot find qualified female director candidates, they actually just need to broaden their board nomination processes.

"We think it's not a pipeline issue, it's an access issue," Colton said in an interview.

State Street said it is prepared to cast proxy votes against board leaders where companies do not meet its diversity expectations.

Data from executive search firm Spencer Stuart shows women account for 28% of directors at U.S. companies and, at the high end, 45% at French companies. But the figure drops to 16% for Indian companies and 11% for companies in Japan, showing the challenge State Street faces with its new policy.

With $3.9 trillion under management State Street is among a select group of influential index fund firms emphasizing environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) matters.

State Street's Taraporevala also said the company expects boards in most developed countries to have women represent at least 30% of their directors by next year, and said companies should take other steps on diversity including disclosing details about directors' racial or ethnic backgrounds.

Separately, State Street will expect companies in developed economies to offer details as outlined by the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, as other top asset managers have done.

State Street calls for women on corporate boards worldwide
 

Related Articles

Chipmaker Broadcom to buy VMware in $61 billion deal
Chipmaker Broadcom to buy VMware in $61 billion deal By Reuters - May 26, 2022 1

By Chavi Mehta and Krystal Hu (Reuters) - Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) Inc said on Thursday it will acquire cloud computing company VMware (NYSE:VMW) Inc in a $61 billion cash-and stock...

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (2)
Jamie Kent
Jamie Kent Jan 14, 2022 1:01PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Hiring practices that take race into consideration are inherently racist.Hiring practices that take ****into consideration are inherently sexist.What happened to treating everyone the same regardless of skin color, **** orientation, religion, etc.? When did equality become a bad word? There is a very simple test: If roles were reversed would it be racist/sexist/discriminatory? If the answer is yes, it is also yes the other way around.
John Laurens
John Laurens Jan 12, 2022 5:18PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Because women are so fun to work with and hang out with.. lmfao. America will return to being a merit based system where only your abilities and intellect are rewarded. '22 '24
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email