Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Staples, FTC stalled on settlement talks

Published 12/17/2015, 05:28 PM
Updated 12/17/2015, 05:40 PM
© Reuters. A shopping cart is seen outside a Staples office supplies store in the Chicago suburb of Glenview, Illinois

By Diane Bartz

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is looking for office supply store Staples (O:SPLS) to improve its offer to divest assets to further its bid to buy rival Office Depot (O:ODP), the agency said in court on Thursday.

Arguing for Staples, Diane Sullivan said that the company had made a "significant and substantial" offer to the FTC. The company said earlier this month that it had offered to divest $500 million in commercial contracts.

Arguing for the FTC, Tara Reinhart said at a pre-trial hearing that the FTC had rejected that as inadequate. "We have actually asked them to come back," she said.

The FTC filed a complaint on December 7 aimed at stopping Staples from buying Office Depot, saying that the deal would hurt big customers who want nationwide contracts to buy their office supplies. The $6.3 billion deal had been announced in February.

Canada's Competition Bureau has also said that it would challenge the proposed transaction.

The FTC is asking the court for a preliminary injunction so that it can try the case in an internal process. The trial on the preliminary injunction is expected in March with a decision in May, said Judge Emmet Sullivan.

The agency stopped a merger attempt between the same two companies in 1997 but in the 19 years since then, Amazon (O:AMZN) and other online sellers, which deliver across the United States, have emerged as competitors, while chain stores such as Costco (O:COST) and Wal-Mart Stores Inc (N:WMT) have further crowded the market.

Staples was emboldened to try again for Office Depot after that chain succeeded in buying No. 3 OfficeMax in November 2013 with no divestitures.

© Reuters. A shopping cart is seen outside a Staples office supplies store in the Chicago suburb of Glenview, Illinois

The case at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is Federal Trade Commission v Staples, Inc. It is case No. 15-2115.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.