Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Last Call for Cyber Monday! Save Now on Claim 60% OFF

SpaceX says US case alleging anti-immigrant bias is unconstitutional

Published Sep 19, 2023 11:29AM ET Updated Sep 20, 2023 11:09AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: SpaceX logo and Elon Musk silhouette are seen in this illustration taken, December 19, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration//File Photo

By Daniel Wiessner

(Reuters) - Elon Musk's SpaceX has sued the U.S. government saying that the government's administrative case accusing the rocket and satellite company of refusing to hire refugees and asylees violates the U.S. Constitution.

SpaceX, in a lawsuit filed in Texas federal court on Friday, says the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) administrative judges who hear cases involving employment bias against immigrants are not properly appointed, and that keeping the case out of court deprives the company of its constitutional right to a jury trial.

The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Tuesday.

DOJ in a complaint issued last month said that from 2018 to 2022, SpaceX routinely refused to hire people who were not U.S. citizens or green card holders. SpaceX wrongly claimed that federal export control laws barred it from employing foreign citizens, DOJ said.

In its lawsuit on Friday, SpaceX said it has employed hundreds of non-U.S. citizens, but that some of its projects have national security implications and it could face steep fines for employing foreign workers.

But regardless of the merits of DOJ's claims, the administrative case is not allowed under the U.S. Constitution, SpaceX claimed.

DOJ administrative judges are appointed by the U.S. attorney general, but have powers that should be reserved only for officials appointed by the president, SpaceX said in the lawsuit.

The company cited a federal appeals court's 2022 ruling that said in-house enforcement proceedings by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission were unconstitutional. The U.S. Supreme Court in June said it would review that decision.

And because the case against SpaceX seeks monetary penalties under federal employment discrimination law, it should be heard in a federal court, the company argued.

SpaceX said it would ask the court to block the administrative case from moving forward pending the outcome of its lawsuit.

SpaceX says US case alleging anti-immigrant bias is unconstitutional
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email