Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

China slams the brakes on Ant Group's $37 billion listing

Published 11/03/2020, 08:26 AM
Updated 11/03/2020, 10:35 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A logo of Ant Group is pictured at the headquarters of the company in Hangzhou, China

By Julie Zhu, Meg Shen and Greg Roumeliotis

HONG KONG/NEW YORK (Reuters) - China suspended Ant Group's $37 billion listing on Tuesday, thwarting the world's largest stock market debut with just days to go in a dramatic blow to the financial technology firm founded by billionaire Jack Ma.

The Shanghai stock exchange said it had suspended the company's initial public offering (IPO) on its tech-focused STAR Market, prompting Ant to also freeze the Hong Kong leg of its dual listing scheduled for Thursday.

This followed a meeting with China's financial regulators on Monday during which Ma and his top executives were told that Ant's lucrative online lending business would face tighter scrutiny, sources told Reuters.

The Shanghai bourse described Ant's meeting with financial regulators as a "major event" which, along with a tougher regulatory environment, may cause Ant to be disqualified from listing.

In China, analysts interpreted the move as a slap down for Ma, who had wanted Ant to be treated as technology company rather than a highly regulated financial institution.

"The Communist Party has shown the tycoons who's boss. Jack Ma might be the richest man in the world but that doesn't mean a thing. This has gone from the deal of the century to the shock of the century," Francis Lun, CEO of GEO Securities, said.

To revive its listing, Ant is trying to establish if it needs to disclose more information to the Shanghai exchange about its relationship with regulators, or if the bourse expects it to resolve all its issues with the regulators, which would take much longer, a person with knowledge of the matter said.

At an event last month attended by Chinese regulators, Ma said the financial and regulatory system stifled innovation and must be reformed to fuel growth. He also compared the Basel Committee of global banking regulators to "an old man's club".

Ant believes the public criticism put Ma in the crosshairs of regulators, the person said.

The suspension reverberated across markets. Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) Group Holding, which owns about a third of Ant, fell 9% in early U.S. trading, wiping nearly $76 billion off its value, more than double the amount Ant was planning to raise.

"This is a curve ball that has been thrown at us ... I don't know what to say," said one banker working on the IPO.

SHARPER SCRUTINY

With its unique business model and the absence of rivals in China or elsewhere, analysts say Ant has mainly thrived as a technology platform away from the banking sector's regulations, despite its array of financial products.

But Beijing has become uncomfortable with banks increasingly using micro-lenders or third-party technology platforms such as Ant for underwriting loans amid fears of rising defaults and a deterioration in asset quality in a pandemic-hit economy.

Reuters reported last month that regulators had scrutinised banks that used Ant's technology platform excessively for underwriting consumer loans as part of a drive to curb risks in the country's financial sector.

The tougher regulatory focus on Ant's cash cow and rapidly growing consumer lending business had emerged as a key concern for investors in the IPO, despite the company's attractiveness as a financial technology player.

Ant originates demand from retail consumers and small businesses and passes that on to about 100 banks for underwriting, earning fees from the lenders with minimal risk to its own balance sheet.

Ant's consumer lending balance was 1.7 trillion yuan ($254 billion) at the end of June, or 21% of all short-term consumer loans issued by Chinese deposit-taking financial institutions. Only 2% of the loans it had facilitated were on its balance sheet, its IPO prospectus showed.

"It's the right move to regulate what's essentially a financial institution as their peers. And it's wrong not to do that in the past, and the mistake is being corrected. It will have a negative impact on pricing," said Zhong Daqi, founding partner of Guangzhou Zeyuan Investment Management Co.

Under draft rules published on Monday by China's central bank and banking regulator, small online lenders must provide at least 30% of any loan they fund jointly with banks.

A banker in Hong Kong close to other Chinese fintechs said those firms thought the new rules were tailor-made for Ant. The banker said Ant may have to split its businesses and make payments, micro-lending and wealth management separate units.

SORRY FOR THE INCONVENIENCE

Ant was set to go public in Hong Kong and Shanghai on Thursday after raising about $37 billion - including the so-called greenshoe option of the domestic leg - in a record IPO that had attracted leading global investment firms.

It was also a sensational draw for mom-and-pop investors in China and Hong Kong who bid a record $3 trillion, equivalent to the annual economic output of Britain, while for the Hong Kong leg retail investors borrowed heavily from banks to buy shares.

An official at a Chinese state-backed investment firm, which is also an existing investor in Ant, wondered whether it would be "politically correct" to make fresh investments in the company given its regulatory run-in.

Starting as a payments processor in 2004, Ant quickly built an empire by offering users short-term loans credited within minutes, as well as selling insurance and investment products.

China's state-backed Economic Daily newspaper said in a commentary that the IPO suspension showed regulators' determination to protect the interests of investors and the most pressing matter was for Ant to carry out "rectifications".

"Ant may be just falling victim to their own size and success," said Alex Sirakov, senior associate at advisory firm Kapronasia.

Ant apologized to investors for any inconvenience, adding it would give further details on the suspension of its Hong Kong listing and applications for refunds as soon as possible.

"We will properly handle the follow-up matters in accordance with applicable regulations of the two stock exchanges."

Alibaba said it would support Ant to adapt and embrace the evolving regulatory framework.

CICC and China Securities Co, co-sponsors for Ant's STAR IPO, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

U.S. banks JPMorgan (NYSE:JPM) and Citigroup (NYSE:C) declined to comment, while Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The three Western banks are co-sponsors of Ant's Hong Kong IPO along with CICC.

Graphic - Alibaba shares plunge: https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/oakvenwkepr/alibaba.PNG

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A logo of Ant Group is pictured at the headquarters of the company in Hangzhou, China

(This story corrects paragraph 4 to say... may cause Ant to be disqualified, not disqualified.)

Latest comments

Jack Ma not only displease Chinese government, but also Chinese people. The monopoly of Ant concerns both of the government and people.
Buy amazon much better investment no deceptive and honest business at least amazom is in the US not in china like baba.
The more you load on baba the more you ll go broke . Ant group must have something wrong with china goverment and it s kind fruad and money laudrying you never know
good opportunity to load more BABA
Yes, I think so...BABA is great!
Pinduoduo is better. Now, I shop more on Pinduoduo and JD, less on taobao and Tmall, which are belong to Alibaba.
I think China did the right thing here. They governed by the people and for the people...so they always put the interest of the people first...
I have lived in China. @Jack_A you've been clearly brainwashed by the dictatorship of the ccp already.
Show is proofs you have lived in China....without that, you are just using he said she said tactics...
 You don't understand CCP and her past and her goals, although you have lived in China. CCP had made and will make mistakes, but she is always developing, changing and evolving to correct her mistakes, to adjust to the need of Chinese people.
For its faults, China’s ‘communist’ government is showing willingness to rigorously look at regulation standards here and protect the people who are its citizens. At face value, to call Ant a tech company (that does everthing and more that financial institution does) rather than a financial institution seems only to avoid regulation and something anyone could foresee as drawing scrutiny eapecially in the Chinese context. US used to have a purposeful government one that took consumer protections seriously. Now its just a free for all which what distinguishes capitalism from market economy.
jack deserves it. he talk like he is a central banker. emperor xi juz nail him down haha.
do any of you have anything helpful to say or did you all just come here to say China, Communism blah blah blah
Any one of you have a useful comment other than communism blah blah blah
CHHHIIINNNNAAAA!!!! Thats all I came to say.
It is Another scam company, just selling hopes n dreams to investors. The winners here for sure is Ma and his entourage
who bets the china market gonna crash thursday and thats why they delay it
logic
you know there r China ETFs traded in US market, right? And you can short them if you believe what u said.
 just remember the FED is acting in a communist fashion - they are printing money to prop up half the S&P which are zombie companies
"...during which they told the[m] that the company's lucrative online lending business faces tighter government scrutiny..."...UNLESS the company increases its kickback to the Chinese Communist Party.
Stop it.
Not kick back, more like share proprietary (customer) information with CCP, and embed CCP data collection protocols or don't get the green light.
With the internet came a boom in care less news.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.