Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

SEC drops case against ex-JPMorgan traders over 'London Whale'

Published 08/18/2017, 11:59 AM
Updated 08/18/2017, 12:00 PM
© Reuters. To match Special Report SEC/INVESTIGATIONS

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The top U.S. securities regulator on Friday dropped its civil lawsuit accusing two former JPMorgan Chase & Co (N:JPM) traders of trying to hide some of the bank's $6.2 billion of losses tied to the 2012 "London Whale" scandal.

The decision by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to dismiss charges against Javier Martin-Artajo and Julien Grout came four weeks after the U.S. Department of Justice abandoned its criminal case against both men, who have denied wrongdoing.

Prosecutors said their case ran into trouble after testimony from Bruno Iksil, a cooperating witness who had been dubbed the London Whale, proved unreliable.

Iksil has publicly shifted blame for the losses toward upper JPMorgan management, including Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon, who at first called the matter a "tempest in a teapot."

JPMorgan ultimately paid more than $1 billion and admitted wrongdoing to settle related U.S. and British probes.

No one was convicted or pleaded guilty over the losses, although Iksil had agreed to cooperate with prosecutors against Martin-Artajo, his supervisor, and Grout, who worked under him.

The men had worked for JPMorgan in London. Martin-Artajo is a Spanish national, while Iksil and Grout are French nationals.

"The government has done the right thing," Bill Leone, a lawyer for Martin-Artajo, said in a phone interview. "The evidence in the case has been pretty overwhelming for some time that our client didn't mislead anyone or do anything wrong."

Edward Little, a lawyer for Grout, said in a phone interview: "At the end of the day, there was no evidence that justified these cases."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The SEC dropped its case despite having a lower burden of proof than the Justice Department to show wrongdoing. It did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.