Unlock Premium Data: Up to 50% Off InvestingProCLAIM SALE

Robinhood, others win dismissal of meme stock 'short squeeze' lawsuit

Published 11/18/2021, 02:21 PM
Updated 11/18/2021, 02:25 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The logo of Robinhood Markets, Inc. is seen at a pop-up event on Wall Street after the company's IPO in New York City, U.S., July 29, 2021.  REUTERS/Andrew Kelly
BBBYQ
-
ETFC
-
GME
-
TWTR
-
AMC
-
HOOD
-

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - A U.S. judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Robinhood Markets Inc (NASDAQ:HOOD) and other brokerages of wrongly preventing retail investors from buying fast-rising "meme stocks," triggering a sell-off.

In a decision on Wednesday, Chief Judge Cecilia Altonaga of the federal court in Miami found no proof of an illegal conspiracy to cut off social media-fueled trading of GameStop Corp (NYSE:GME), AMC Entertainment (NYSE:AMC) Holdings Inc, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc (NASDAQ:BBBY) and six other stocks.

Investors in the proposed class action said the brokerages and Citadel Securities LLC colluded to halt a "short squeeze" that was causing billions of dollars of losses for Citadel and hedge funds that were betting on falling stock prices.

The investors said the late January trading curbs left them "no option" but to sell at plummeting prices.

But Altonaga said in her 51-page decision that the investors fell "far short" of providing direct evidence of an antitrust conspiracy, despite emails among senior Robinhood and Citadel executives that lent "some credence" to their claims.

"(A)re a few vague and ambiguous emails between two firms in an otherwise lawful, ongoing business relationship enough to nudge plaintiffs' claims across the line from conceivable to plausible?" Altonaga wrote. "The court thinks not."

Altonaga also dismissed related claims against E*Trade Financial (NASDAQ:ETFC) Corp and four other defendants.

Frank Schirripa, a lawyer for the investors, said on Thursday they were disappointed but expected to amend their complaint in the next few weeks.

Robinhood said in a statement: "This further confirms that the conspiracy theory of collusion has no basis in fact."

Citadel said it was pleased with the decision. E*Trade declined to comment. A separate proposed class action accuses Robinhood of negligence.

The meme stock frenzy has been fueled by investors using online forums such as Reddit and Twitter (NYSE:TWTR).

Many traded from home because of the COVID-19 pandemic, through brokerages that had eliminated trading commissions.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The logo of Robinhood Markets, Inc. is seen at a pop-up event on Wall Street after the company's IPO in New York City, U.S., July 29, 2021.  REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

Last month, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said in a report that markets essentially worked well during the volatility. The regulator did not suggest policy changes.

The case is In re January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, No. 21-md-02989.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.