Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
💎 Access the Market Tools Trusted by Thousands of Investors Get Started

Absent Prince Harry not suing publisher because of press 'vendetta', lawyer says

Published Jun 04, 2023 08:20PM ET Updated Jun 05, 2023 11:28AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Britain's Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, leaves the High Court in London, Britain March 28, 2023. REUTERS/Hannah McKay
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio

By Sam Tobin and Michael Holden

LONDON (Reuters) -Prince Harry is suing a British tabloid publisher to focus attention on alleged unlawful activities and not because of "some vendetta against the press", his lawyer told London's High Court on Monday.

Harry, King Charles' younger son, is one of more than 100 high-profile figures suing the Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), the publisher of the Daily Mirror, Sunday Mirror and Sunday People, for alleged phone-hacking and other unlawful behaviour between 1991 and 2011.

He had been expected to attend court on Monday morning but failed to appear. The judge, Timothy Fancourt, said he was "surprised" and MGN's lawyers described his absence as "absolutely extraordinary".

However, the prince will face hours of questioning in the witness box on Tuesday becoming the first senior British royal to give evidence in court for 130 years.

The trial began last month, as lawyers representing Harry and three other test claimants attempted to prove that unlawful information gathering was carried out with the knowledge and approval of senior editors and executives.

Harry's allegations are the focus this week, and his lawyer David Sherborne on Monday said the motivation for bringing the lawsuit was to shift "the attention that comes with his position on these activities".

Unlawful information-gathering was carried out "not just by (MGN) journalists, but they have been concealed even though they were known about by senior members of the board of this Plc (company), as well as the legal department," Sherborne added.

Harry's life was "invaded by these three newspapers using unlawful methods and it is the use of these methods by a national media group that has brought him here, not some vendetta against the press generally", the lawyer said.

MGN's lawyer Andrew Green said there was no evidence that Harry's phone was hacked once, let alone habitually, and none of those who had admitted illegally listening to voicemail messages said they had targeted the prince.


Outlining Harry's case, Sherborne said some 2,500 articles had appeared about Harry's private life in the MGN titles during the period the allegations covered, from when he was a young boy at school through to the death of his mother in 1997, his later military training and adult life.

"Nothing was sacrosanct or out of bounds and there was no protection from these unlawful information-gathering methods," Sherborne said.

He also suggested Diana's phone had been hacked, referring to handwritten letters she had sent to a well-known TV presenter, Michael Barrymore, which detailed secret meetings between them after he had publicly disclosed he was gay.

In one letter, sent months before her death, she said she was devastated that the Daily Mirror had been contacting her office to ask about the meetings.

"Plainly the Daily Mirror has been listening in to voicemail messages," Sherborne said. Green said that was total speculation made without any evidential basis.

Sherborne also accused MGN of engendering the "mistrust" between Harry and his brother William, the heir to the throne, with whom he has had a high-profile falling out in recent years since Harry and his American wife, Meghan, stepped down from royal duties and moved to the United States

An article from 2003 about the brothers disagreeing over how to treat their mother's former butler showed "the seeds of discord between these two brothers are starting to be sown", Sherborne said.


MGN, now owned by Reach, has previously admitted its titles were involved in phone-hacking and has settled more than 600 claims at a cost of more than 100 million pounds ($120 million) in damages and costs.

It apologised at the start of the trial after admitting on one occasion the Sunday People had unlawfully sought information about Harry. But, Green said there was nothing to suggest any other unlawful activity relating to the royal.

In court documents, MGN said some information had come from royal aides.

This week's appearance will be the second time this year Harry has attended the High Court, after joining singer Elton John and others for hearings in March over their lawsuit against the publisher of the Daily and Sunday Mail tabloids.

Harry, the fifth-in-line to the throne, is engaged in several legal battles with the British press, including a similar phone-hacking case against Rupert Murdoch's British newspaper arm.

The prince has also accused his family and their aides in his memoir and Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) documentary series of colluding with tabloids. The palace has not commented on those accusations.

Absent Prince Harry not suing publisher because of press 'vendetta', lawyer says

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your profile, will be public on and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Connecticut Yankee
A_Jaundiced_Eye Jun 04, 2023 10:17PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Oh good. Prince Harry is going to show up in court.  Because he's been out of the public eye for what, 15 minutes?
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email