Breaking News
0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

LVMH abandons $16 billion Tiffany takeover, battle lines drawn

Stock MarketsSep 09, 2020 10:56AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
2/2 © Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Tiffany & Co. jewelry is displayed in a store in Paris 2/2

By Sarah White, Silvia Aloisi and Greg Roumeliotis

PARIS/NEW YORK (Reuters) - French luxury goods giant LVMH abandoned its $16 billion takeover of Tiffany, a deal that has lost its gloss in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, setting the stage for a bitter battle as the U.S. jeweler sued to force it through.

The French group, led by billionaire Bernard Arnault, said its board had received a letter from the French foreign ministry asking it to delay the acquisition to beyond Jan. 6, 2021, given the threat of additional U.S. tariffs against French products.

LVMH (PA:LVMH) finance chief Jean Jacques Guiony said the letter was unsolicited and came as a total surprise, angrily rejecting suggestions that his company was using it as a pretext to pull out of the takeover of Tiffany (N:TIF).

"The deal cannot happen. We are prohibited from closing the deal," Guiony told reporters on a conference call.

Nonetheless the terms of the deal, which would have been the biggest-ever in the luxury industry and was agreed before the pandemic, have also become less commercially attractive.

The spread of COVID-19 has hammered sales in the sector hard and raised questions about whether Louis Vuitton owner LVMH was overpaying.

Guiony also said LVMH was not happy with the way Tiffany had been managed in recent months, calling its performance "lackluster".

French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian will address in detail the issue of the planned takeover, a government spokesman said on Wednesday after a cabinet meeting.

The French government could be neither "passive" nor "naive" in the context of international negotiations with its partners, spokesman Gabriel Attal told reporters.

LVMH added that Tiffany had also asked it to postpone the closing of the deal, to Dec. 31 of this year from an already extended deadline of Nov. 24. It said its board had decided to stick to the terms of the original merger agreement, which stated that the deal must be completed by Nov. 24 -- something that is no longer possible, Guiony said.

TIFFANY FILES LAWSUIT

Tiffany, however, filed a lawsuit against LVMH in Delaware - the U.S. state where the U.S. jeweler is registered - to force the French company to complete the deal as agreed last year, accusing it of deliberately stalling completion of the takeover.

It said in its lawsuit LVMH had made clear that its real goal was "to attempt to renegotiate the merger price to which the parties agreed last November and, barring renegotiation, run out the clock."

It also refuted LVMH's suggestion that it can pull out of the deal "by claiming Tiffany has undergone a material adverse effect or breached its obligations under the Merger Agreement, or that the transaction is in some way inconsistent with its patriotic duties as a French corporation."

Tiffany shares were down about 10.5% in New York, while LVMH shares in Paris were flat.

JEWELRY LOSES SHINE

The luxury industry is facing an unprecedented sales slump as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, after a decade of stellar growth, with revenues expected to fall by as much as 35% this year. It will take until 2022-23 for revenues to return to 2019 levels, according to consultancy Bain.

The Tiffany deal had looked in doubt since it emerged in June that LVMH boss Arnault, France's richest person and a shrewd deal maker, was exploring ways to reopen price negotiations with the jeweler because of the pandemic, according to sources with knowledge of the matter.

Those sources said later that the group had decided against renegotiating the terms of the takeover, and LVMH has repeatedly said it was committed to the deal. Guiony said on Wednesday his group had never sought to obtain a better price.

But an initial Aug. 24 deadline was pushed back by three months as the deal had not yet been cleared by the EU Commission and other antitrust authorities.

When it struck the deal, LVMH was betting it could restore the luster of Tiffany by investing in spruced-up stores and new collections.

But the U.S. jeweler's worldwide sales fell 29% to $747.1 million in the three months to end July, missing expectations of $772 million, even though it flagged a recovery in August. LVMH's own watches and jewelry division was the worst-performing in the first half of the year.

On Wednesday, Tiffany said it expected its earnings for the fourth quarter to exceed those for the same period last year.

LVMH abandons $16 billion Tiffany takeover, battle lines drawn
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Stephen Horne
Stephen Horne Sep 09, 2020 9:37AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
A company that sells $2000+ handbags is concerned they are overpaying for Tiffany. lol I thought that's what this sector was all about!
Kaveh Sun
Kaveh Sun Sep 09, 2020 9:37AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
2000+ is just for the name. Tiffany name has value but not that much. People pay for names.
Ben Dover
Ben Dover Sep 09, 2020 9:37AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
All in the brand. Tiffany employees her up to 90% off on various smaller items. The product itself is worth 10-15% above metal, all the value is in the brand.
Jason Bacon
Jason Bacon Sep 09, 2020 9:37AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
LVMH doesn't want to pay too much, it just wants customers who gladly fork over $3000 for a canvas bag.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email