
Please try another search
(Bloomberg) -- Lloyds Banking Group PLC (LON:LLOY) won a landmark London lawsuit Friday over its decision to take over the ailing HBOS Plc a decade ago -- a turbulent chapter that “deeply troubled” senior executives and ultimately contributed to Lloyds having to seek a government bailout itself.
The U.K. government didn’t pressure Lloyds into making the offer, Judge Alastair Norris said in his ruling. While there were “imperfections” in Lloyds’s circular giving details of the takeover, it wasn’t enough to mislead, he said.
“The majority who approved the acquisition did not do so under some misapprehension of the position,” Norris said in the 208-page ruling. “They knew the course recommended unanimously by the board. They knew the risks identified by the board. They knew that the board assessed the chance of advantage as outweighing the risk inherent in the transaction.”
The lawsuit rekindled interest in the U.K. response to the global financial crisis and heard testimony from Lloyds' executives as well as the head of the financial regulator. Around 6,000 investors sued the lender for as much as 600 million pounds ($773 million), accusing managers of deliberately misleading shareholders into accepting the deal.
Lloyds was forced to take a 20.5 billion-pound bailout after the purchase, while other lenders accepted rescue packages or sought outside funding to strengthen their balance sheets as loans soured.
For the Lloyds board, the takeover was “once-in-a-lifetime” opportunity to expand with a deal that under ordinary circumstances would’ve been blocked by regulators. Ex-CEO Eric Daniels, who left Lloyds in 2011, said that the British Prime Minister Gordon Brown told the bank it would ease the competition issues to ensure a deal.
Alongside Daniels, former Chairman Victor Blank was also questioned during the trial. The executive said he was “deeply troubled” upon learning of HBOS’s funding issues days after striking a deal. He said that he only became aware of the bank’s inability to access crucial central bank funding after Lloyds had already announced its plans to buy HBOS.
Hector Sants, the former head of the U.K. financial regulator, also gave evidence.
The claimants, which include around 300 pension and investment funds, accused Lloyds of “secretly” making a 10 billion-pound loan facility available to HBOS and that the bank received billions in “covert” financial support from the Bank of England and the U.S. Federal Reserve.
Lloyds rejected any accusation of wrongdoing in its representation of the deal to shareholders and said the due diligence it did prior was “adequate” and indeed “more extensive than normal.”
“Throughout this process, the group has sought to act in the interests of our shareholders,” a spokeswoman said in an emailed statement.
By Ernest Scheyder (Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court has ruled that the federal government may give thousands of acres in Arizona to Rio Tinto (NYSE:RIO) Plc for a copper mine,...
By Michael Erman NEW YORK (Reuters) - Pfizer Inc (NYSE:PFE) and BioNTech SE (NASDAQ:BNTX) said on Saturday that a booster dose of updated versions of their COVID-19 vaccine,...
By Pamela Barbaglia and Anirban Sen LONDON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - Global dealmaking is entering an arid season as raging inflation and a stock market rout curb the appetite of many...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.