Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Trump Organization found guilty of tax fraud scheme

Published 12/06/2022, 10:47 AM
Updated 12/07/2022, 01:37 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Trump Organization's former Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg leaves the courtroom in New York, U.S.,  November 15, 2022. REUTERS/Yuki Iwamura

By Luc Cohen and Karen Freifeld

NEW YORK (Reuters) -Donald Trump's real estate company was convicted on Tuesday of carrying out a 15-year-long criminal scheme to defraud tax authorities, adding to the legal woes facing the former U.S. president as he campaigns for the office again in 2024.

The Trump Organization - which operates hotels, golf courses, and other real estate around the world - was found guilty of paying personal expenses for top executives including former chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg, and issuing bonus checks to them as if they were independent contractors.

The company faces up to $1.6 million in fines after being convicted on all charges, including scheming to defraud tax authorities, conspiracy and falsifying business records. Trump was not charged in the case.

Justice Juan Merchan, who presided over the trial in state court in New York, set a sentencing date for Jan. 13.

While the fine is not expected to be material for a company of the Trump Organization's size, the conviction could complicate its ability to do business.

Weisselberg, 75, testified as the government's star witness as part of a plea deal that calls for a sentence of five months in jail.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, whose office prosecuted the case, called the verdict "very just."

"The former president's companies now stand convicted of crimes," Bragg said in the New York courthouse after the verdict, speaking of the Trump Corporation and Trump Payroll Corporation, the two units of the Trump Organization which were convicted.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Asked if he regretted not charging Trump in the case, Bragg did not respond.

He has said that the office's investigation into Trump is continuing.

APPEAL

Alan Futerfas, a lawyer for the Trump Organization, said the company would appeal and that the criminal law governing corporate liability was vague.

"It was central to the case," he told reporters after the verdict.

The jury deliberated for about 12 hours over two days.

The case centered on charges that the company paid personal expenses like free rent and car leases for executives including Weisselberg without reporting the income, and gave them bonuses as non-employee compensation from other Trump entities like the Mar-a-lago Club, without deducting taxes.

According to testimony during the four-week trial, Trump himself signed the bonus checks annually, paid private school tuition for Weisselberg's grandchildren, authorized the lease for his luxury Manhattan apartment and approved a salary deduction for another executive.

"The whole narrative that Donald Trump was blissfully ignorant is just not real, prosecutor Joshua Steinglass told jurors during his closing argument on Friday.

He said the "smorgasbord of benefits" was designed to keep top executives "happy and loyal."

Republican Trump, who on Nov. 15 announced his third campaign for the presidency, said in a statement he was "disappointed" by the verdict but called the case a "Manhattan witch hunt." Both Bragg and his predecessor who brought the charges, Cyrus Vance, are Democrats.

SEPARATE LAWSUIT

The Trump Organization separately faces a fraud lawsuit brought by New York state Attorney General Letitia James.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Trump himself is being investigated by the U.S. Department of Justice over his handling of sensitive government documents after he left office in January 2021 and attempts to overturn the November 2020 election, which he lost to Democrat Joe Biden.

Lawyers for the Trump Organization argued that Weisselberg carried out the scheme to benefit himself, not the company. They tried to paint him as a rogue employee. Weisselberg is currently on paid leave and testified that he hopes to get another $500,000 bonus in January

Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on Nov. 19. that his family got "no economic gain from the acts done by the executive."

Weisselberg, who pleaded guilty in August to concealing $1.76 million in income from tax authorities, testified that although Trump signed checks involved, he did not conspire with him.

He said that the company saved money by paying for his rent, utilities, Mercedes-Benz car leases for him and his wife and other personal expenses rather than raising his salary, because a wage hike would have had to account for taxes.

He said Trump's two sons - who took over the company's operations in 2017 - gave him a raise after they knew about his tax dodge scheme.

By then, Trump was president, and the company was preparing for greater scrutiny.

"We were going through an entire cleanup process of the company to make sure that since Mr. Trump is now president everything was being done properly," Weisselberg testified.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Latest comments

This wasn't a government verdict. 12 ordinary people of a variety of political stripes determined laws had been broken.
Huh? So if it was a government edict, it would be upheld? You smart.
  "1984" is NOT supposed to be an instruction manual on how to run your political party.
 I think that book is too complex for MAGA, more likely Animal Farm
the fascist minions here are right to scream foul, but not in the way they think. in a fair, free and transparent legal and political system, trump would already be in prison and would never even have made president. instead he keeps escaping accountability
 So your argument is Trump should not be punished  for cheating because others cheated more?  Multiple wrongs make a right?
  No.  you cannot read.   Skelet was referring to Trump, the the Trump Org.
* not the Trump Org.
Seems like weaponizing government against someone
How so? These charges are against a corporation that committed tax fraud. Crimes are supposed to be dealt with by the law, and that's all that happened here. Trump, himself, was not even charged.
Against someone like criminals.
This guy is a New York crook and mobster
Ivanka (and other retrumplicans, who believe laws/rules only apply to others) did similar things w/ gov't emails, too.  No consequences.   Not even threats to lock her up.  Hunter, unlike Ivanka, was never nepotistically appointed into gov't power.
 Not only CNN.  And "In the excerpted portion of the clip, Biden was discussing his efforts on behalf of the Obama administration to pressure Ukraine into prosecuting corruption and firing Viktor Shokin, an ineffective prosecutor."  --  snopes.com
Biden was draining the swamp.
... which the retrumplicans only give lip service to; they criticize the draining when it actually happens.
Political trials. Exactly like they do in Russia, Venezuela, etc.
lol, Guilty verdict - first of many to come
Tax fraud trial. No one is above the law.
 That's why Trump wants to change the law, by terminating the Constitution.  "Exactly like they do in Russia, Venezuela, etc."
and yet Trump continues to dodge legal actions, for his criminal behavior against America, while president.
For the moment.
and yet Trump continues to dodge illegal actions, for his criminal behavior against America, while president.
why wasn't there more out cry about Trump's use of private servers by members of his inner circle...
Ivanka (and other retrumplicans, who believe laws/rules only apply to others) did similar things w/ gov't emails, too.  No consequences.   Not even threats to lock her up.  Hunter, unlike Ivanka, was never nepotistically appointed into gov't power.
more fake investigations... what about Hillary Clinton server and Hunter Biden laptop?
trump's AG's couldn't find enough to make that dog hunt - otherwise it would have been on FOX 24/7 trump on the other hand is guilty and the future looks bright for more justice
 "fox covered it plenty"  -- did they?  if they really covered it, then you would know Trump's own DOJ and State Dept cleared Hillary.....and of course Trump's DOJ also had Hunter's laptop for nearly a year in 2020 and chose not to file any charges.....but why let facts get in the way of a good rant eh?
  Fox News itself claimed in court it “cannot reasonably be interpreted as facts.”  Fox News coverage of Trump's big lie got it sued by voting machines companies and it had to issue retractions and use disclaimers.
and yet the Biden cartel escapes all scrutiny. What else is new. Can you say one party authoritarian dictatorship. Better get used to it.
What cases did Trump started/continued against this "Biden cartel" when he was potus?  When Republicans held both houses of Congress?
"Can you say one party authoritarian dictatorship."  -- so you are already giving up on the GOP majority in the House?  not exactly a ringing endorsement for the speaker-wanna-be McCarthy is it?
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.