Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Judge rejects Whole Foods employees' claims over Black Lives Matter face masks

Published 02/05/2021, 02:37 PM
Updated 02/05/2021, 05:30 PM
© Reuters. Workers of the South Lake Union Whole Foods protest against store management not allowing workers to wear Black Lives Matter apparel in Seattle

© Reuters. Workers of the South Lake Union Whole Foods protest against store management not allowing workers to wear Black Lives Matter apparel in Seattle

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - A federal judge on Friday dismissed nearly all of a lawsuit accusing upscale grocery chain Whole Foods Market of illegally punishing workers who wore Black Lives Matter face masks on the job.

Twenty-seven plaintiffs had accused Whole Foods in a proposed nationwide class action filed in Boston of selectively enforcing its dress code banning "visible slogans, messages, logos or advertising" unrelated to the company.

The plaintiffs said Whole Foods would send workers home without pay or impose disciplinary actions for wearing the masks and related apparel, even as it let employees wear masks bearing political messages and sports team logos.

U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs, however, said Whole Foods and its parent, Amazon.com Inc (NASDAQ:AMZN), did not engage in racial discrimination or violate Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964.

"At worst, they were selectively enforcing a dress code to suppress certain speech in the workplace," she wrote. "However unappealing that might be, it is not conduct made unlawful by Title VII."

Burroughs said one plaintiff can pursue a retaliation claim.

The plaintiffs' lawyer Shannon Liss-Riordan expects her clients to appeal, saying in an email the decision "goes against the tide of case law recognizing the critical importance of eradicating race discrimination from worksites across our country."

Whole Foods has said its dress code was "facially neutral" and that it has "zero tolerance" for retaliation. It has also along with Amazon expressed support for Black Lives Matter.

"We remain dedicated to ensuring our team members feel safe and free from discrimination and retaliation," a spokesman said following Burroughs' decision.

The judge said employees who are not happy with the policy could try to persuade Whole Foods to change it, express themselves outside the workplace and perhaps encourage consumers to shop elsewhere, or find somewhere else to work.

A video showing the death last May 25 of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police sparked nationwide protests about racial injustice, including the treatment of Blacks in police custody.

© Reuters. Businesses in midtown Manhattan boarded up during continued protests in New York

The case is Frith et al v Whole Foods Market Inc (NASDAQ:WFM), U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, No. 20-11358.

Latest comments

Finally a voice of reason in a sea of insanity.
People at bottom of society use excuses of racial injustice to dig money out of large corporations and govt.
they BLM are racist they only care when a white person kills a back person . They ould
where are they when a black kills a black
Don’t mess eith the oligarch, you will lose
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.