Please try another search
© Reuters. A Tesla vehicle drives past Tesla's primary vehicle factory after CEO Elon Musk announced he was defying local officials' coronavirus disease (COVID-19) restrictions by reopening the plant in Fremont, California, U.S. May 11, 2020. REUTERS/Stephen Lam
By Daniel Wiessner
(Reuters) - Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) Inc has suffered another setback in its bid to challenge the powers of California's Civil Rights Department, which is suing the electric carmaker over alleged race discrimination at its flagship assembly plant.
A judge in Oakland, California, in a tentative ruling late Tuesday dismissed Tesla's counter-suit claiming the agency did not notify the company of the bias allegations or give it a chance to settle before suing it last February.
California Superior Court Judge Evelio Grillo gave Tesla until Feb. 3 to file an amended complaint fleshing out its claim that the agency has adopted "underground regulations" to flout the requirements it must meet before filing lawsuits.
A hearing is scheduled for Wednesday morning.
A Tesla representative and the agency did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The agency argues that Tesla's Fremont, California, plant is a racially segregated workplace where Black employees have been harassed and discriminated against over job assignments, discipline and pay.
Tesla has denied wrongdoing and said the lawsuit is politically motivated.
Grillo in August denied Tesla's motion to dismiss the case, saying its attack on the agency's practices was not a defense against the discrimination claims. Tesla filed the counter-suit in September.
Also in August, a different state administrative agency declined to review a Tesla complaint arguing that the Civil Rights Department was suing businesses without conducting thorough investigations.
Several lawsuits are pending in California courts that accuse Tesla of tolerating discrimination and sexual harassment at its factories.
A state judge in April cut a jury award to a Black worker who alleged racial harassment from $137 million to $15 million. The worker rejected the reduced award and opted for a new trial, which is scheduled for March.
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.