Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

India Orders Wireless Carriers to Pay $13 Billion in Dues

Published 10/24/2019, 04:04 AM
Updated 10/24/2019, 04:41 AM
© Reuters.  India Orders Wireless Carriers to Pay $13 Billion in Dues

(Bloomberg) -- India’s top court ordered eight telecom carriers, including Bharti Airtel Ltd. (NS:BRTI). and Vodafone (LON:VOD) Idea Ltd (NS:VODA)., to pay the government as much as 920 billion rupees ($13 billion) in past dues, dealing a blow to the businesses already struggling to make profits and pare debt.

The Supreme Court, in a ruling read out by a two-judge bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra, said it will decide on the timeline for payments. Thursday’s decision possibly puts an end to the two-decades-old legal dispute over airwaves fees owed to the government.

The operators have disputed for years over how authorities calculate their annual adjusted gross revenue, a share of which is paid as license and spectrum fees. With the ruling, the court upheld the government’s method, while rejecting the companies’ plea to exclude revenue from non-telecommunications businesses.

The court order is the latest shock to an industry that has piled on billions of dollars in debt to roll out 3G and 4G networks in the past decade, even as intense competition for users led to a brutal tariff war, weighing on earnings. Bharti, controlled by tycoon Sunil Mittal, and billionaire Kumar Mangalam Birla’s venture with Vodafone (LON:VOD) have a combined net debt of almost $28 billion.

The worst hit are the operators who have been in the business for more than 10 years, while it is far less consequential for Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd., which entered in 2016 and owes the least among all -- 130 million rupees.

Shares of Vodafone (LON:VOD) Idea plunged as much as 23% to a record low, while Airtel tumbled as much as 9.7%, the biggest intraday loss since October 2012. Reliance Industries Ltd (NS:RELI), the parent of Jio, rose 1.5%.

Stay Afloat

Since Jio disrupted the market with free calls and cheap data, the incumbents have struggled to stay afloat. Two have entered insolvency in the past two years, while some have merged to combine forces, like Vodafone’s local unit with Idea Cellular Ltd.

For the government that runs perennial budget deficits, the court ruling comes as a fiscal bonanza. On Wednesday, Telecommunications Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad revealed a $6 billion spending plan to revive two money-losing state-run carriers.

The government had raised a total demands of around 920 billion rupees against all telecom operators, including defunct ones, according to filings in the court.

In the past two years, two of India’s biggest telecom operators -- Malaysian tycoon T. Ananda Krishnan’s Aircel Ltd., and Anil Ambani’s Reliance Communications Ltd. -- went into bankruptcy. The huge demands can also disrupt their resolution process scaring away potential buyers.

High capital spending, dividends and spectrum costs have resulted in neutral or negative free cash flow for telecom companies in South and Southeast Asian countries including India, according to a Moody’s Investors Service note on Oct. 23. Moody’s expects these trends to continue through at least 2021, and doesn’t expect telcos will generate enough cash to pay down debt.

The leading telcos in India pay the largest share of their aggregate revenue for spectrum at 7.6%, followed by Thailand at 7.3% and Bangladesh at 7%, Moody’s said.

The legal dispute dates back to the 1999 telecom policy that mandated license and spectrum fee to be paid by operators as a share of their revenue. Telecom companies have argued that only core income accrued from use of spectrum should be considered for calculation of adjusted gross revenue, while the government has argued that revenue from all operations must be included.

A lower court had ruled in favor of telecom companies but the federal government’s department of telecommunications challenged the ruling in the top court and kept adding to demands, including penalties for all the years.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.