Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

U.S. oil producer EP Energy seeks to save deal from regulator -sources

Published 02/15/2022, 04:14 PM
Updated 02/15/2022, 07:06 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Federal Trade Commission seal is seen at a news conference at FTC Headquarters in Washington, U.S., July 24, 2019. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas

By David French and Laura Sanicola

(Reuters) - EP Energy is exploring a sale of oil-producing acreage in Utah it hopes will avert a challenge from a U.S. antitrust regulator to its agreed $1.5 billion takeover by private equity firm EnCap Investments LP, people familiar with the matter said.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has privately informed EP Energy and EnCap that it would sue to block their deal if they went ahead with it, the sources said. The regulator is concerned that EnCap - which owns XCL Resources, another Utah oil producer - would become too dominant a player in Utah's Uinta Basin, the sources added.

The FTC has rarely opposed oil and gas producer mergers, with the last challenge more than 20 years ago. It took the view that energy prices are driven by supply and demand worldwide rather than regional consolidation.

Its opposition to EP Energy's sale marks a potential change in stance and comes amid growing pressure on President Joe Biden's administration to respond to consumer angst over gasoline prices, which have soared 40% in the last year, U.S. Labor Department figures show.

EP Energy, which emerged from bankruptcy in 2020 and is owned by former creditors, has retained an investment bank to find a buyer for its Uinta assets, the sources said. One added the 155,000 net acres are likely worth in the high hundreds of millions of dollars.

The sources requested anonymity because the matter is confidential. The FTC and EnCap declined comment. EP Energy and XCL did not respond to requests for comment.

EP Energy and XCL jointly accounted for about a third of the 92,000 barrels per day Uinta oil production in October, according to data provider Enverus. Rival Ovintiv (NYSE:OVV) Inc also produced a third, with 16 others making up the rest.

In opposing the deal, the FTC has heeded concerns that refiners in Salt Lake City, which produce gasoline and other petroleum products for Utah and other Western states, could pay more to buy oil if competition from EP Energy is eliminated, the sources said.

The type of oil extracted from the Uinta is unlike any other crude grade found in the United States, with a waxy consistency and a high paraffin content, according to Utah's Department of Environmental Quality.

Local refiners acquire this crude at a discount to other blends, given lower transportation costs. Reduced competition could impede this dynamic, and reconfiguring facilities to process another type of oil is expensive and time-consuming.

There are five refineries in Salt Lake, owned by Chevron Corp (NYSE:CVX), Marathon Petroleum Corp (NYSE:MPC), HollyFrontier Corp, Silver Eagle Refining and Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRKa)'s Big West Oil.

Chevron and Marathon declined comment. HollyFrontier, Silver Eagle and Big West did not respond to comment requests.

The Utah Petroleum Association (UPA) wrote to the FTC earlier this month to argue for EP Energy's sale to EnCap. The lobby group said the combined company will produce more oil to help drive down energy prices, thanks to efficient production techniques and lower costs, according to a copy of UPA's Feb. 1 letter seen by Reuters.

XCL and all five refiners are senior members, with EP Energy also in the group, according to UPA's website.

The UPA told Reuters it supports the transaction but has not had any direct interactions with the FTC, adding it could not speak to issues relating to individual members.

MORE SCRUTINY

The White House has already irked the oil and gas industry by making climate change a priority in its administrative agenda. It temporarily halted issuing new leases for drilling on federal land and proposed ending some fossil fuel subsidies. Energy companies argue these moves will increase energy costs.

The last major oil and gas producer merger challenged by the FTC was BP (NYSE:BP) Plc's $27 billion acquisition of Atlantic Richfield Co in 2000.

The FTC sued to block the deal and only agreed to drop its objections after BP offered to divest oil production acreage in Alaska.

The White House has been vocal in its requests for the FTC to act as the reopening of economies in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic drives up energy consumption. Brian Deese, director of the National Economic Council, wrote to FTC Chair Lina Khan in August asking her to investigate soaring energy prices.

Khan responded that the FTC will scrutinize consolidation among gas station operators, but also look at energy industry dealmaking more broadly.

Last year, the FTC extended the approval process for at least five oil and gas mergers and acquisitions, including EP Energy-EnCap, Reuters has reported.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Federal Trade Commission seal is seen at a news conference at FTC Headquarters in Washington, U.S., July 24, 2019. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas

The FTC has been flexing its antitrust muscle across many sectors since Biden became president last year. Among the deals it has sued to block in recent weeks are U.S. defense contractor Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT)'s $4.4 billion agreement to buy rocket engine maker Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings (NYSE:AJRD) Inc and U.S. chip supplier Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) Corp's $40 billion acquisition of semiconductor design provider Arm Ltd.

(This story corrects to reflect that crude has a high paraffin content, not high sulfur content, paragraph 9)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.