Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Exclusive-Nord Stream 2 owner considers insolvency after pipeline halt, sanctions -sources

Published 03/01/2022, 06:11 AM
Updated 03/01/2022, 12:53 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A road sign directs traffic towards the Nord Stream 2 gas line landfall facility entrance in Lubmin, Germany, September 10, 2020.   REUTERS/Hannibal Hanschke/File Photo

By Aziz El Yaakoubi and Shariq Khan

(Reuters) -The Swiss-based company which built the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from Russia to Germany is considering filing for insolvency, two sources familiar with the situation said, as it attempts to settle claims ahead of a U.S. sanction deadline for other entities to stop dealings with it.

The United States sanctioned Nord Stream 2 AG last week after Russia recognised two breakaway regions in eastern Ukraine prior to its invasion of the country, which has prompted a wave of economic sanctions by the West.

Nord Stream 2 AG, which is registered in Switzerland and owned by Russian state-owned gas giant Gazprom (MCX:GAZP), last year completed the $11 billion project which was designed to double the capacity to pump gas from Russia to Germany.

The two sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the talks about a potential insolvency are confidential, said that Nord Stream 2 AG has been working with a financial adviser on clearing some of its liabilities and could formally begin insolvency proceedings in a Swiss court as soon as this week.

Nord Stream 2 AG did not comment on possible insolvency. Gazprom declined to comment.

Swiss newspaper Blick's website posted a video interview with Silvia Thalmann, director of economic affairs in the canton of Zug, where Nord Stream 2 AG is based.

In an apparent confirmation of Nord Stream 2 insolvency when Thalmann was asked about job cuts at the company, she said: "This is not a mass dismissal (of staff). A mass dismissal is only when the company continues to exist. In this case, however, it is a bankruptcy."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

She could not be reached for immediate comment outside business hours. Nord Stream 2 AG was also not immediately available by phone.

The 1,230 km (767 mile) pipeline had not begun commercial operations because it was pending certification in Germany, which last week put this process on hold as a result of the escalating Ukraine crisis.

The U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control issued an executive order on Feb. 23 authorising "the wind down of transactions involving Nord Stream 2 AG" or "any entity in which Nord Stream 2 AG owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest" by March 2.

Gazprom paid half the cost of building Nord Stream 2, with the remainder of the $11 billion pipeline project financed by British oil and gas major Shell (LON:RDSa), Austria's OMV, France's Engie and Germany's Uniper and Wintershall DEA.

Shell, Engie, and Wintershall DEA did not immediately respond to requests for comment. OMV declined to comment.

A spokesperson for Uniper said the company does not currently have any such information when asked about a possible insolvency filing by Nord Stream 2 AG.

It was unclear if all entities related to Nord Stream 2 AG would be shut down or how Gazprom plans to proceed with the pipeline maintenance.

Switzerland's Economy Minister Guy Parmelin said in an interview with Swiss radio service RTS on Monday that all Nord Stream staff, more than 140 employees, who worked for the company in the Swiss city of Zug had been fired.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Job cuts were confirmed on Tuesday by Nord Stream 2 AG, which said in a statement: "Following the recent geopolitical developments leading to the imposition of US sanctions on Nord Stream 2 AG, the company had to terminate contracts with employees. We very much regret this development".

Germany, which gets half its gas from Russia, had backed Nord Stream 2 to diversify energy supplies for Europe, but the project faced opposition within the European Union and from the United States for increasing the region's gas dependence on Russia and allowing Moscow to reduce volumes through Ukraine, for which it has to pay a transit fee.

Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine last week, several large companies, including oil majors, said they would exit their Russian operations, including Shell, which said it will no longer be involved in Nord Stream 2 among other investments.

Latest comments

Gazprom--and some won't want to hear this--is a large percentage why (maybe a 100%) Russia invaded Ukraine as, with Nordstream 2 natural gas pipeline Russia's lifestyle immediately changed. Natural gas would mean new real economy flowing through Russia as it's 5.5 BILLION (EU & Britain financed other half) investment would've supplied Russia great wealth. And control of its own past sordid QoL to a new state of living & livelihoods. But, Germany--per USA mainly voicing disapproval--said "no." Do you really think Putin wouldn't now drop a nuclear bomb on USA because of this motivation? Again, I told you you wouldn't like what I simply gleaned from article here. God help us, everyone, Putin's plans now with our indirect involvement in war may cause great mishap (for lack of wanting to use a better word) in the USA soon. Pray for peace, there's much at stake now for world as this action into Ukraine is, likely, not Putin's last.
ignorant comment.
no more oil dependence on liars and dictators.
It is gas, not oil.
Oil? Gas maybe…
Let's call it energy.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.