Breaking News
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

Exclusive: Investors call for governments to toughen climate accounting - letter

Stock MarketsSep 20, 2021 02:11AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Clouds gather but produce no rain as cracks are seen in the dried up municipal dam in drought-stricken Graaff-Reinet, South Africa, November 14, 2019. REUTERS/Mike Hutchings/File Photo

By Simon Jessop

LONDON (Reuters) - Investors managing more than $2.5 trillion have called on governments to compel companies and auditors to file financial accounts aligned with the world's net zero emissions target, a letter seen by Reuters showed.

Writing to UK climate czar Alok Sharma ahead of the next round of global climate talks in Glasgow in November, the group said doing so was crucial to clarify the financial impact of climate change and give an incentive to invest accordingly.

Governments should mandate a requirement for companies to make clear the financial consequences of a net-zero pathway and for auditors to call out where companies have failed to do so, the investor group said in the Sept. 14 letter.

It follows a recent study by Carbon Tracker and the Climate Accounting Project that found more than 70% of the world's heaviest-emitting companies did not disclose the full risks in their 2020 disclosures, with 80% of audits showing no evidence the risk had been assessed.

"Most (companies) continue to use assumptions that presume little or no decarbonisation, and thus report financial results predicated on governments failing to implement their stated commitments and, in some cases, legal targets," the letter said.

Sharma's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The upcoming climate conference, dubbed COP26, is seen as the most important since governments originally struck a deal to limit global warming in Paris in 2015, with all parties now being asked to accelerate their efforts

Britain's accounting watchdog has already warned companies and auditors to do a better job, while global accounting and auditing standard setters have restated the need to assess material risks, which can include climate risk.

Despite investor bodies representing $100 trillion in assets calling in September for Paris-aligned accounts, the inaction from companies and auditors meant government action was needed, the investor group said.

"If we choose to wait for companies to respond to investor pressure, it could take years to deliver the numbers we require to invest in a way that is aligned with the Paris goals," the investors' letter said.

Signatories to the letter include a body representing British local government pensions, Sweden's AP2 pension scheme and investors including Sarasin & Partners, which coordinated the letter and an accompanying position paper, as well as Candriam and Federated Hermes (NYSE:FHI).

For countries like Britain, which have made reaching net-zero emissions a legal obligation, changing the law around accounting and auditing would be "entirely consistent" with other government efforts, the investor group said.

The stakes are high. Companies such as BP (NYSE:BP) wrote off billions of dollars last year after they lowered long-term oil price assumptions. Without proper accounting, money needed to fund the transition to a low-carbon economy could end up in the wrong place.

"Accounts that leave out material climate impacts misinform executives, shareholders and creditors and, thus, result in misdirected capital," the investor group said.

Exclusive: Investors call for governments to toughen climate accounting - letter

Related Articles

Hertz orders 100,000 Tesla cars - Bloomberg News
Hertz orders 100,000 Tesla cars - Bloomberg News By Reuters - Oct 25, 2021

(Reuters) - Car rental firm Hertz has ordered 100,000 Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) Inc cars, Bloomberg News reported on Monday, citing people with knowledge of the matter. This marks the...

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (3)
Steve Hillman
Steve Hillman Sep 20, 2021 8:57AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
the whole compliance thing is a joke. governing bodies and government's of various countries just keep moving the goalposts, and keep charging taxpayers more, and more of their hard earned money
Steve Hillman
Steve Hillman Sep 20, 2021 8:54AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
some countries are REQUIRED to comply with carbon neutral requirements and others just say, "those requirements are for OTHER countries to meet, not us". the public, who is required to pay all the bills through taxes, is not even informed what each country's carbon footprint is on an annual basis, and are provided no metrics listing countries with best and worst compliance records, so no one knows which countries comply, and which countries flout the rules, and and and, the government's NEVER publish what the future carbon footprint goals are for 5 years, or 10 years, or 20 years, so the public is left wondering what goal we are shooting for, but yet the public is still required to pay money out of their tax bill to the government, who provides no accounting of the metrics. what a joke the governing bodies are, as well as the government's around the world. this mean no s, they tax us, and don't have to meet any budgetary objectives, they can waste money, citizens don't know the diff.
Darren Caris
Darren Caris Sep 20, 2021 3:48AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Another joke article written by the media arm of the Democratic party.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email